At 8.06 this morning it was done: the House of Representatives passed the government’s Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Bill 2014, following its passage and amendment just after midnight in the Senate. Parliamentarians then got to go home for Christmas, having delivered the Immigration Minister extraordinary powers that in effect obliterate any further pretence that Australia regards asylum seekers as human beings.
The bill restored the failed Howard-era policy of temporary protection visas, a mechanism that actually increased boat arrivals when last attempted. Whether Clive Palmer seriously believes that there is a pathway to citizenship contained in a kind of homeopathic form within the legislation — or it merely suits its purposes to pretend there is — we don’t know, but Scott Morrison has been crystal clear that TPVs will never provide permanent protection.
But the bill goes much further, freeing Australia from any obligations associated with the Refugee Convention, including giving Morrison and his department — which has repeatedly demonstrated it is profoundly incompetent and resistant to the most basic forms of accountability — the power to return people to torture and persecution without judicial review.
That the passage of such a bill was only secured with the blatant use of blackmail, in which Morrison used detained children as hostages to be bartered for Senate compliance, says much about the wretched contents of the bill, about the complete amorality of the government and about the depths to which it has needed to sink in order to give itself a win on which to end a wretched year. That crossbench senators like Ricky Muir, Nick Xenophon and the PUPs gave in to such threats, however, is a reflection entirely on them. Their ostentatious anguish at having to deal with such a choice can’t hide the grim reality of their actions.
The bill is immoral, it’s bad policy, and it’s been passed using the lives of children as bargaining chips. The division lists in the Senate and the House of Representatives will be a roll call of shame in years to come.
47 thoughts on “Crikey says: refugee bill an immoral disgrace”
Norman Hanscombe
December 5, 2014 at 6:07 pmBalwyn, try not to be too upset when “one day” Morrison is judged by Australian voters. In the meantime I guess that if one includes the pejorative connotation of pedantic, its use by you is reasonable?
Yclept, must you always try to get a bad name for refugee advocates with absurd remarks such as your machine gun comment?
Yclept
December 5, 2014 at 7:07 pmSorry Norman, I probably should have just thrown around a few pompous insults – like the master.
AR
December 6, 2014 at 7:13 amIt is the oldest form of blackmail known – threaten children.
Not for nothing was the phrase ‘hostages to Fortune’ coined.
It is bastardry like this that tempts me, as a life-long anti-theist, to wish that there really was a Hell as I’m sure Dante would have needed an extra low, low level for Morriscum and his enablers.
To paraphrase Hannah Arendt, he exemplifies “the evil of banality”.
klewso
December 6, 2014 at 7:35 amPersonally I think it takes a certain type of person to use these kids as pawns, to hold them to ransom to get your way through legislation (after all this time/at Christmas).
[Like using “the cost of funerals” to play politics; peddling the idea that parents would use their kids as pawns, threatening to throw them overboard if they’re not taken in (a la “Children Overboard”), to win an election]
I reckon that sort are scum – others reckon they’re Prime Minister material.
……. But then, that’s just me.
Norman Hanscombe
December 6, 2014 at 8:21 amklewso, I assume you’d like to return to the situation when Labor/Greens replaced the Coalition and there were only about a half dozen in Detention? Perhaps not though to the numbers dying at sea which rocketed after we took over Government?
You have some quaint interpretations of past events, but that’s one thing on which it’s not ‘just you’.
Draco Houston
December 6, 2014 at 10:07 am“While I agree with a lot of what is said in this editorial, perhaps you should watch for two things happening in the near future:
Firstly, I predict the governments poll numbers will improve.
Secondly, if the question was asked (and it will be) do voters want the boats stopped at ANY price, a significant majority would say ‘Ýes’.
Welcome to reality – this is what we have become.
Makes you proud to be Australian, doesn’t it????”
How can anyone think this anymore? If people only cared about the boats the government would be doing great in the polls.
Norman Hanscombe
December 6, 2014 at 10:36 amAlso, Draco, if enough politicians AND voters ignored the realities of what’s happening in the world as you do, you might feel proud, but Australia’s future would be far more precarious.
David Hand
December 6, 2014 at 11:53 amI don’t believe you Draco.
If the question about stopping the boats at any price was asked, I believe most people would say no. This is because “at any price” includes sinking boats through military action and killing them. So the question “Do you want the boats stopped even if it means the navy sinking them and killing their occupants” most people would say no.
Nice straw man for your “ashamed to be Australian” meaningless slogan though eh?
Norman Hanscombe
December 6, 2014 at 12:00 pmDavid, I can believe him. Devoted Fundamentalists like Draco make Don Quixote look like a man of the world.
Norman Hanscombe
December 6, 2014 at 1:33 pmAR, if you were to fit into a theistic religion [as opposed to your current non-theistic variety] with degree of savagery your post contains the Mediaeval Church would be apt.
Mind you, your literary efforts wouldn’t qualify you for the Jesuits?