At the time of Crikey’s deadline it looks likely that Scott Morrison’s immigration amendments will pass the Senate. The Immigration Minister wants to reintroduce temporary protection visas and make sweeping changes to the way that refugees are assessed — to the extent that lawyers are concerned many refugees won’t be getting any protection at all, temporary or otherwise.
To get these changes through Parliament, Morrison has offered sweeteners to senators who might be wavering because of concerns about human rights and the flouting of international law.
If the bills don’t pass? The refugees stay locked up.
As former immigration minister under Labor Tony Burke pointed out on Radio National this morning, Morrison appears to be using asylum seekers as political hostages:
“I find it chilling that Scott Morrison is effectively wanting to use people as hostages here. He could’ve started processing. He chose to not do the processing and is now saying unless we vote for his measures, then he’ll continue to keep people in detention.”
The problem is, Labor also “could’ve started processing”. On Burke’s watch, not a single asylum seeker held in the Manus Island detention centre was processed.
Both major political parties have sustained a bizarre obsession with asylum seekers over the past two decades — and both have used humans as political pawns. Now, Clive Palmer, who has either fallen for Morrison’s spin or is being wilfully naive, is helping them make that treatment not only possible but legal under Australian law.
It’s a dark day for Australian politics.
10 thoughts on “Crikey says: refugee hostage-taking a stain on both sides”
David Hand
December 4, 2014 at 2:55 pmMaybe Palmer has not fallen for Morrison’s spin nor is naive. Maybe he is like most Australians including people like Bob Carr and thinks most people arriving by boat are economic migrants and not genuine refugees. MOst of Labor believes that but it’s in their political interest not t to say.
Hey, that’s why they reversed their disastrous policy in 2013
Yclept
December 4, 2014 at 3:15 pmAnd yet no one cares about the 99% who come in a comfortable aircraft.
graybul
December 4, 2014 at 4:11 pmJust for the record David, I and many, many Australians are neither for or against any Party.
We are for a fairer Australia, and we will not be silenced. A fairer Australia . . a belief that once prevailed . . . will not be silenced by any political Party. The enforced anonymity, incarceration and inhumane treatment of refugees by the State [as you well know] is indefensible.
David Hand
December 4, 2014 at 4:25 pmWhat I know well is that both sides of politics want the boats to stop because refugees by and large are not on them.
Norman Hanscombe
December 4, 2014 at 9:19 pmgraybul, you realise the irony of an anonymous poster having shots at public figures about some alleged “anonymity” of immigrants trying to bypass our laws?
drsmithy
December 5, 2014 at 12:55 amMaybe he is like most Australians including people like Bob Carr and thinks most people arriving by boat are economic migrants and not genuine refugees.
Then why are they risking their lives on boats when they could just jump on a plane ?
drsmithy
December 5, 2014 at 12:57 amgraybul, you realise the irony of an anonymous poster having shots at public figures about some alleged “anonymity” of immigrants trying to bypass our laws?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Internet,_nobody_knows_you're_a_dog
AR
December 5, 2014 at 7:07 amThis bastardry (by both L1 & L2) is not about asylum seekers anymore than work for the dole is about unemployment or denigrating sole parents is about child welfare.
It is just the vicious appeal to the basest of human nature, kiss-up, kick-down exemplified by xenophobia (not even racism specifically) meaning anyone who can be identified as Other.
Alex
December 5, 2014 at 9:11 amIt sure is a dark day! Shame on both sides of the political divide, indeed!
graybul
December 5, 2014 at 10:17 amNorman . . Come on mate, let’s not tangle meanings. Anonymity as posted refers to previous and present Government(s) policy of de-personalizing applicants for refugee status by labeling each person {child} with a number . . historical examples being a tattoo on the wrist!
And David . . you do not genuinely believe that because support exists for stopping the boats . . that ipso facto the same people support brutal incarceration {without end} leading to severe, long lasting mental disorders / or suicide.
As Australians . . surely we are all better than the political imperative justifying the current treatment of vulnerable boat people?