The successful float of Medibank Private adds to a relatively short list of trouble-free privatisations at the Commonwealth level. Selling off government assets has an unhappy history in Canberra.
The Keating government managed the sales of the Commonwealth Bank and the combined Qantas-TAA entity competently. But the Howard government experience was a series of stuff-ups. The first tranche of the Telstra sale was significantly underpriced, costing taxpayers $12 billion in 1997 dollars — the equivalent of around $20 billion now. After criticism of the handling of the first tranche and the role of overpaid (literally) private advisers, the second tranche of Telstra was significantly overpriced, which was good for taxpayers but left those beloved “mum and dad” investors deep in the red for years. The sale of the government’s vehicle fleet was bungled and led to extended litigation with Macquarie Bank. IT outsourcing within the public service saw firms like IBM and Telstra scoop up massive contracts while delivering IT services so bad they often left public servants without computer access for days. The sale and leaseback of Commonwealth-owned properties saw windfall gains for private buyers who quickly made their money back and then some, by charging exorbitant rents to the former owners. The Australian National Audit Office reports into the sales are a series of scathing reviews of ideology triumphing over common sense, inexplicable rushes and bureaucrats being gulled by the private sector.
Finance Minister Mathias Cormann, however, has quickly and quietly proceeded to sell Medibank Private — something that should have been done a decade ago — and got around $700 million more than the $5 billion sale figure we’d all long figured the insurer would fetch. It’s significant that the only press reports critical of yesterday’s commencement of trading were of the asinine variety: Fairfax carried a report about small investors whining they couldn’t sell stock quickly enough, and The Australian Financial Review reported with a straight face an investment banker’s complaint that the government priced it too high to see a surge on the first day of trading. “You need to make sure that you price these things so that you attract people to your next transaction and the government wants to sell some assets,” he muttered darkly. The screen jockey was wrong: Cormann priced the sale just right, securing a good outcome for taxpayers while not risking the Telstra 2 outcome of investors being left deep underwater.
And getting this right was important: a botched sale would merely have added to the deep voter antipathy toward privatisation, the one liberal market reform the Australian electorate has never warmed to and one that, based on the Commonwealth experience, you could forgive it for not doing so. Instead, it bodes well for the government’s program of further privatisations of bodies such as Defence Housing Australia. Unfortunately, the other really important privatisation, that of Australia Post, appears to be off the agenda; indeed, its moment may have passed as the internet sends AP permanently into the red.
In a government that has lurched from one bungle to the next, Cormann’s sale of Medibank stands out for its competence and quiet efficiency. Just for once, the Coalition indeed underpromised and overdelivered.


16 thoughts on “Cormann’s Medibank success reverses a run of privatisation duds”
cairns50
November 26, 2014 at 1:54 pmwrong wrong wrong bernard, medibank private should not have been sold, and Cormann has showed himself to be nothing more than a serial liar, the same as just about all of Abbott’s cabinet
Duritz
November 26, 2014 at 2:23 pmQantas a success? Really? The Comm Bank in private hands is good policy? This is just another stupid decision to privatise without any thought as to why.
ianjohnno
November 26, 2014 at 2:27 pmI must disagree with you about your positive attitude to privatizations.
My thoughts on what should be done to privatisers and their supporters would be severely moderated.
ianjohnno
November 26, 2014 at 2:39 pmAlso, buyers of T2 might be interested to know that there was a great deal of criticism about the price from Telstra workers, until an edict came down from on-high that any action by any member of staff that might compromise the price would result in loss of job; which would only be the beginning of their woes.
Chris Hartwell
November 26, 2014 at 3:13 pmGiven the problems of privatisation rarely show in the initial sale, to call the privatisation of the public insurer a success is premature. Give it a few years, gauge the quality of service delivered relative to the cost, and then we’ll assess whether it’s been successful or not.
Going on history alone, I’m not optimistic.
GF50
November 26, 2014 at 3:39 pmSorry Bernard, I also think that it is far too soon to see the affect of the effect on the cost to the Public system, short term success in selling a Public asset.
The history in Australia with health funds ripping the money out of the Public System (worlds best practice standards)into a Private Profit base does not work in the economic or individual health care needs of the Australian community. Hell I could write a research based dissertation on this!
GF50
November 26, 2014 at 4:06 pmNo need! Croaky 04/03/2013 Jennifer Doggett: “Private Health Funds Riding on The Medicare Gravy Train”
klewso
November 26, 2014 at 4:43 pmEarly daze?
Johansen Frank
November 26, 2014 at 5:11 pmBerhard, could you explain why this sale should have happened decades ago. Fat Joe accused Labor of dipping in and taking dividends from Medibank Private and using it to prop up their budget, but to me thats better than selling the cow that produces the milk. And he is going to use the proceeds to make their woeful budget position look better than it is.
Gratton Wilson
November 26, 2014 at 6:32 pmNed Kelly is not dead. This is theft. Medibank Private is wholly owned by its Members, or Medibank Private, as a Government owned institution, has swindled its contributors. Employees of Medibank Private have repeatedly stated in writing that the Members owned it and all its funds – and that all its funds were used for the benefit of its Members. Who lied?