Nov 18, 2014

Modi talks up Adani’s Galilee project, but even generous subsidies might not be enough

The Queensland government and Indian Prime Minister are both keen to mine the Galilee basin, but it will take more than goodwill to make the mines viable.

Paddy Manning

Crikey business editor

Among his achievements in this landmark visit, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has definitely given Adani Mining's $16 billion Carmichael coal project in the Galilee Basin a big shot in the arm. The giant project was touched on in Modi's Canberra press conference with Prime Minister Tony Abbott this morning, and his parliamentary address was long on the economic opportunities for Australia as a "major partner in every area of our national priority" including "energy that does not cause our glaciers to melt, clean coal and gas, renewable energy, [and] fuel for nuclear power". In Brisbane yesterday, Modi said the Carmichael project would "set a new standard for India-Australia co-operation", and the rhetoric was backed up with a fistful of dollars: Adani was given a US$1 billion line of credit by the majority government-owned State Bank of India. Queensland Premier Campbell Newman announced that in addition to the open-ended royalty holiday already on offer to the first mover in the Galilee Basin -- and Adani is unquestionably the most advanced -- the state government was willing to invest hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to fund the associated rail and port projects. As The Australia Institute's Richard Denniss points out this morning, for at the least the beginning of its projected 90-year life, the 11 billion-tonne Carmichael mine will pay no royalties, and would not proceed without subsidies. It will be interesting to see how Queensland taxpayers feel about that in the coming state election. This was not the state government's plan: only in August Deputy Premier Jeff Seeney told The Australian Financial Review that it was up to the proponents in the Galilee Basin to sort out their own project funding. It speaks volumes that Australia's largest coal project is now so completely dependent on government financial support. But as the NSW government discovered with the Cobbora coal mine it hoped to sell off -- underpinned by subsidised off-take agreements with power stations -- even over-the-top state subsidies might not be enough to make an uncommercial project viable. Queensland funding would be conditional on opening the infrastructure up to the other possible users in the Galilee, but, as Crikey wrote here last week, the two other major proponents are struggling to get off the ground. The scenario canvassed in today's Courier-Mail, with not one but two state-funded rail lines built to the Galilee, is exceedingly unlikely. Gina Rinehart's Hancock Prospecting partnership with GVK is years away, mired in financing difficulties and a corruption scandal back in India, while Clive Palmer said yesterday his Waratah Coal was unlikely to take up Newman's offer. Palmer's spokesman told Crikey the Newman announcement was pre-election political spin: "a good news story on the back of high unemployment figures". Palmer remains miffed at the support for his two Indian rivals in the Galilee, and implacably hostile to Newman. As the spokesman said: "On one hand this government wants to sell assets and now they want to invest in helping one company." There are misgivings on India's side as well. Quite apart from the legal challenge from India's Conservation Action Trust, referred to here last week, Indian tweeters today bemoaned Modi's support for the Carmichael mine, calling it a repayment for billionaire friend, supporter and chairman of the Adani Group Gautam Adani, who is on this trip (and has apparently joined five of the PM's six recent overseas jaunts). Modi is a reformer, and India is in the middle of a wrenching restructure of its coal industry, hoping to double production, opening it up to private investment and selling down the state-owned company Coal India, which mines the vast bulk of the country's abundant coal. Adani Mining is moving steadily, aiming to take a final investment decision by the end of next year and to produce first coal by 2017. Even with the finance it still has billions to raise and there are questions about the commitment of its partner in the rail project, Korea's steelmaker POSCO. There is a long way to go.

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

6 thoughts on “Modi talks up Adani’s Galilee project, but even generous subsidies might not be enough

  1. catchat

    TAFE Qld , education generally and health have been decimated by the LNP. After a predictably concocted budget emergency they have driven the Qld economy off a cliff.
    Funding a dubiously connected Indian company’s efforts, who have no skin in the game whatsoever, that goes against any and all climate science reason, will hopefully be enough to throw out the LNP in the upcoming election. Unthinkable after the Labor wipeout, they have become drunk with power and over reached with the same chutzpah Howard showed with “work choices”. The only mandate they have ever had is from Murdoch and his propaganda arms, not the people of Qld and they will be rewarded for their deceipts at the ballot box.

  2. beachcomber

    The day after the G20 Leaders (including Tony Abbott) agreed to “phase out subsidies to the fossil fuel industry” the Newman LNP Government will build the rail line for an Indian coal mine in Australia.
    The Liberals/LNP have no intention of doing anything to reduce carbon emissions.
    Tony Abbott and Campbell Newman are silly old men, trapped in a silly old mindset where we just dug things up and flogged things off.
    They cannot think of an Australia that leads the world in Science or Renewable Energy.
    They are locking us into becoming a third world economy in the 22nd Century.

  3. klewso

    Is that their hands in our pockets again to pay for all this ….?

  4. MJPC

    I didn’nt hear Carbon Tony’s address that said “major partner in every area of our national priority” including “energy that does not cause our glaciers to melt, clean coal and gas, renewable energy, [and] fuel for nuclear power”, but I bet there was a tinge of relief he was with a fellow traveller on climate change, rather than that nasty Obama.
    “its projected 90-year life”; yeah, that should see the climate well and truly stuffed and those pesky pacific islands under water.

  5. Dogs breakfast

    No royalties for an unspecified period, so we are literally giving away our resources. Paying hundreds of millions for a rail line that as far as I can tell has no purpose other than to move coal, which we don’t earn royalties for.

    An overseas company for whom the likelihood of earning tax dollars from their profits must be deeply in question on two grounds, one that it isn’t profitable anyway and two that it would be so easy for the company to transfer their profits to the Cayman Islands.

    So what exactly is the benefit again? I assume this is about a relatively small number of jobs that we will actually pay hundreds of millions for that will leave a freaking great scar on the earth, advance climate change, and leave us with a rail line that no-one has any use for apart from shifting coal.

    Am I missing something?

    Good thing that fossil fuels are competing on a level playing field with renewables.

    With apologies if I just blew up your sarcasm meter.

  6. Dogs breakfast

    Makes subsidies to the car industry look like a damn good economic initiative.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details