“No cuts to the ABC or SBS,” Tony Abbott repeatedly insisted before the last election. And he was a man to keep his promises, come what may. “It is an absolute principle of democracy,” Abbott had said in 2011, “that governments should not and must not say one thing before an election and do the opposite afterwards.” In an election debate with Kevin Rudd last year, Abbott confirmed this approach — he would keep all his promises and delay the return to surplus if need be.
Now the national broadcasters face $300 million in cuts, with the ABC to lose at least $50 million a year for five years, a cut that will wipe out the additional funding provided to the ABC by both the Howard government and Rudd/Gillard governments over the last decade.
That many in the Coalition want to target the ABC for its perceived bias is well known, as is the enthusiasm for the government’s ardent supporter, News Corporation, for the destruction of a public broadcaster that competes very effectively with News Corp across a range of platforms. But the insouciance with which the Prime Minister has broken this promise — along with so many others — in the 14 months since being elected is surely one of the problems behind the government’s poor public esteem and dire polling. Voters’ trust can be a fragile thing for even the most skilful politician, but Abbott seems almost to have gone out of his way to flagrantly breach his pre-election undertakings in a way even the most disengaged voter must surely have observed.
Perhaps one of the reasons why the government’s constant focus on national security and foreign policy has failed to prompt any significant improvement in its polling is because those issues require voters to trust a national leader. And Abbott seems to have squandered whatever trust voters may have ever had in him very quickly indeed.
24 thoughts on “Crikey says: Abbott has a trust problem”
klewso
November 20, 2014 at 8:55 amObviously I wasn’t the only one.
drsmithy
November 20, 2014 at 10:01 amAgain, I am left wondering how dishonest, deceptive and destructive the Abbot Government has to be before one is “allowed” to describe them as such.
klewso
November 20, 2014 at 10:44 amAs for “anonymity”, in a Murdochracy,
[where the medium of mass communication is dominated by intolerant conservatism – happy to use their market dominance to bully, harangue, attack and vilify those that don’t agree with them. Where they can edit out opinion or use the panic button to truncate communication – the sort of m.o used by the likes of Murdoch, “Chaff-bag” Jones, Hadley and the rest of Singo’s Cock-or-Two circus to limit the spread of discontent.
The sort of activity that culminated in the Ditch the Bitch rally that drew Abbott and the rest of that knot out to front for the cameras?]
What are we (without those Weapons of Mass Deception of theirs) left with – to treat them the way they think they have every Right to treat those that disagree with them – but guerrilla tactics?
Norman Hanscombe
November 20, 2014 at 1:44 pmkleso, you’re so well-armed with your Weapons of Self-Deception that you don’t realise you’re relying not on “guerrilla tactics” so much as Gorilla Intellectual Level ‘arguments’.