Australians don’t trust either the government or communications companies to store their personal data safely and oppose the use of metadata to pursue file sharers, today’s Essential Report shows.
The government is currently pushing for a mass surveillance scheme in which personal communications data would be retained for two years by communications companies and accessible without a warrant by security agencies. Those agencies are the most trusted to store data safely, with 53% of voters having some (36%) or a lot (17% — the difference is rounding) of trust in security agencies storing personal data safely. However, telecommunications companies and ISPs aren’t trusted to safely store data: 63% of Australians have little or not trust that they will store data securely, while just 32% have some or a lot of trust they will. Nor is the government outside security agencies trusted (54% versus 42%), and there’s minimal trust in other private companies, 70%-20%.
Since August, voters have come around to the government’s argument that it needs access to metadata to protect society — support for that view has increased from 37% to 41%, while support for the view that collection of personal data is dangerous has fallen from 49% to 44%. However, voters oppose the use of data retention to target file sharers. Australian Federal Police Commissioner Andrew Colvin has said that the AFP would use data retention to pursue “illegal downloaders” despite governments efforts to claim it would only be used for serious crime and terrorism. Some 47% of voters oppose that, compared to 34% who support it, with the elderly and Liberal voters keen for the AFP to use its resources to pursue people downloading Game of Thrones et al.
There are also major differences between age groups and genders over communication with friends and family. Older people are more likely to rely on landline phones, while they are barely used at all by younger people. Older people use mobile phones and Facebook less, and text far less than younger people, while women text and use Facebook more than men. A quarter of all voters say their use of landlines has decreased a lot in the last two years, and 32% say their use of letters has decreased a lot, while use of mobiles and texting has increased a lot for 16%/18% of people.
Meanwhile Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s approval rating has slipped just slightly, down a point to 39%, while disapproval has edged up two points to 50% — not enough to erase the gains he made in October. He continues to be significantly more unpopular with women (-16) than men (-5). Opposition Leader Bill Shorten’s ratings haven’t shifted much either — approval is up 2 points to 37% but so is disapproval, to 38%; Shorten’s net disapproval rating (-1) has been the same since September. Abbott still leads as preferred PM, though, 36% to 34%, down from 38% to 32% last month. Men prefer Abbott 40%-33% while women prefer Shorten, 36% to 32%.
On voting intention, no change: Coalition on 40%, Labor on 38%, Greens on 10%, Palmer United on 4%, the rest 9% (one up, actually — rounding, again) for a two-party preferred outcome of 52%-48% for Labor.



5 thoughts on “Essential: voters don’t trust companies on data retention”
CML
November 11, 2014 at 5:25 pmGood to see that the number of bogans swallowing the cr+p put about by the Murdoch/Abbott government is increasing (retention of data to protect society). NOT!!!
Bohemian
November 11, 2014 at 10:21 pmYep not surprising is it. I don’t think they (governments worldwide) care anymore. If you see the way Australia aligns with the US in the TPP and on every foreign policy dictum emanating from the CFR/State Department, there is basically one foreign/international trade policy which the US and Australia pursue and another that everybody else including New Zealand and Canada share. I am sorry I don’t believe our interests align that closely with any country that we should concede to be joined at the hip. And being the junior party, without the aid of Machiavelli, I think we are going to lose out. We now live in a world where everything is a secret and my impression is that this government has a predilection for that way of operating.
This collapse in trust of government and basically any formal institution has happened worldwide as people become aware of something that has always been but is now in the open i.e. the extent and depth of the relationship between government and the money interests. Although lately it has become so devoid of morality that people can no longer repress their anxiety. Twiddledee or Tweedledum it matters not. All the horses are trained at the same stable.
If we have any sovereignty left after the TTP it will be a miracle although the real miracle could be that it may yet not happen. Whether good or bad, it’s just all the secrecy. It makes one suspicious. And now all this surveillance. What a croque! Add in some phoney wars, terrorists with market tested brand names, questionable epidemics (remember bird flu and last years influenza campaign), weather patterns and the rest. How could any person with brain cells trust governments or corporations anywhere? Big Pharma has been fined $30 billion in the last five years by authorities largely sympathetic to their position so imagine what some real investigators might have done. And governance/tax avoidance is supposedly the No.1 issue at next week’s G20 .
Of course most people don’t care but some surely must. Secret agreements and secret societies according to JFK in a speech to the US Magazine Publishers Association in 1963, have no place in a free society. But he didn’t last long after making it.
klewso
November 12, 2014 at 9:13 amThis whole metadata thing;
[it’s probably just me, but whenever they start telling us how safe metadata is with these “humans (with all their frailties, multiplied by all that temptation)”, I think of Keith Moon, and that song from Tommy, “Do You Think It’s Alright (to leave the boy with Uncle Ernie)”, starts up in my head?]
Norman Hanscombe
November 12, 2014 at 10:55 amThe record of the majority of the population whenever it involved complex issues is hardly reassuring.
As with the majority opinion in 1492, while the general population ‘knew’ the world was flat, the majority of the reasonably educated population had long known the world wasn’t flat, even if their view of a sphere wasn’t quite the same as the geoid reality.
drsmithy
November 12, 2014 at 11:41 pmI don’t think they (governments worldwide) care anymore.
And so long as most countries, like Australia, lack genuine democracy, why should they ? It’s not like the people have much influence over their behaviour.