Freya Newman, the 21-year-old student who blew the whistle on a secret scholarship awarded by a private design school to Tony Abbott’s daughter, should be applauded for her bravery.
Newman’s sentencing was delayed this morning and had not yet been handed down at the time of Crikey’s deadline. She faces two years in jail for accessing restricted data on a computer at the Whitehouse Design Institute, where she once worked as a library assistant.
There is no doubt that the information Newman leaked was in the public interest. In our minds, there is also no doubt that if Frances Abbott were not the Prime Minister’s daughter, Newman would not be in court today, facing jail for her actions.
As Whistleblowers Australia president Cynthia Kardell told Crikey after news of the scholarship was first broken by news website New Matilda:
“Police do have discretion. They don’t investigate everything that turns up on their doorstep. Often … they’ll investigate if there’s a strong political interest. There’s an amazing amount of money and power on the father’s side, who has full access to the law and can find ways to use the government to push it along. No doubt somewhere along the way, someone will ask him whether this use of the Crimes Act is heavy-handed.”
Whistleblowers like Newman take massive personal risks. In return, they often face smear campaigns and a lifetime of being branded a “troublemaker”. Taking on powerful individuals and institutions takes a financial and emotional toll, too.
That’s why media outlets must take a stand in their defence and acknowledge the critical role they play in exposing information those in power would prefer remained hidden.
Crikey stands in support of Freya Newman, and all whistleblowers who risk their personal freedom to expose corrupt behaviour by those in power.
52 thoughts on “Crikey says: we stand with Freya”
Norman Hanscombe
October 24, 2014 at 7:42 amAR, surely you could spell out your point better so that if Crikey installs the screening you suggest, it won’t affect you?
Norman Hanscombe
October 24, 2014 at 8:22 ammax, if you had any experience with scholarships you might understand that your interpretation of what has been said is absurd.
Norman Hanscombe
October 24, 2014 at 8:25 amBrendan, apart from a plug for your site, you’ve achieved little other than suggest you really don’t understand what’s involved in Freya’s actions.
drsmithy
October 24, 2014 at 9:11 amFrom my point of view, no facts are in dispute doctor.
So you see no ethical issues with the giving of gifts and favour to the family of high-level politicians through an utterly opaque process and subsequently shrouded in secrecy ?
drsmithy
October 24, 2014 at 9:14 amdrsmithy, surely you can’t be unaware of examples of this in the media? Don’t you have access to standard media sources?
Surely you can add something of substance rather than rhetorical waffle and self-aggrandisement ?
AR
October 24, 2014 at 9:43 amDoc – as has become increasingly common, half of the comments on this thread are from the same Magisterial Impotence (he thinks it’s omniscience)so the answer to your query re rhetorical waffle & self aggrandisement is “NO!”.
I can’t be arsed to count his preponderance in other threads but increasingly, he tries to overwhelm with sheer verbiage – intrinsic relevance is not the point – just obfuscation, as with OneHand.
He starts at sparrow in his ripostes and, as above, four in a row are not uncommon.
D’ya reckon there is no-one/nothing else in his “life”?
Brendan Jones
October 24, 2014 at 10:00 am> Doc – as has become increasingly common, half of the comments on this thread are from the same Magisterial Impotence.
Yes, AR. And at the end of the day, the only person whom he has convinced of his arguments is himself.
Until Crikey gets a [Mute] button, some advice from Mark Twain: ‘Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.’
klewso
October 24, 2014 at 11:40 amI’ll never understand why it’s so Right to publish and republish anything that embarrasses Labor and the Left (to white-ant voter perception of their ability to govern/electoral outcomes) : while self-censorship seems to be the order of the day when it comes to embarrassing Murdoch’s Limited News Party – in a media dominated as it is by Bolt-hole conservative values?
…. But then again I’m not Right in the head.
Yclept
October 24, 2014 at 1:53 pmDavid, the same old complaints that Crikey isn’t as extremely RW as News and yet you still subscribe…
Yclept
October 24, 2014 at 1:56 pmThanks Norman, I’m sure if I follow the MSM more closely I’ll get the truth (whole truth and nothing but).