Freya Newman, the 21-year-old student who blew the whistle on a secret scholarship awarded by a private design school to Tony Abbott’s daughter, should be applauded for her bravery.
Newman’s sentencing was delayed this morning and had not yet been handed down at the time of Crikey’s deadline. She faces two years in jail for accessing restricted data on a computer at the Whitehouse Design Institute, where she once worked as a library assistant.
There is no doubt that the information Newman leaked was in the public interest. In our minds, there is also no doubt that if Frances Abbott were not the Prime Minister’s daughter, Newman would not be in court today, facing jail for her actions.
As Whistleblowers Australia president Cynthia Kardell told Crikey after news of the scholarship was first broken by news website New Matilda:
“Police do have discretion. They don’t investigate everything that turns up on their doorstep. Often … they’ll investigate if there’s a strong political interest. There’s an amazing amount of money and power on the father’s side, who has full access to the law and can find ways to use the government to push it along. No doubt somewhere along the way, someone will ask him whether this use of the Crimes Act is heavy-handed.”
Whistleblowers like Newman take massive personal risks. In return, they often face smear campaigns and a lifetime of being branded a “troublemaker”. Taking on powerful individuals and institutions takes a financial and emotional toll, too.
That’s why media outlets must take a stand in their defence and acknowledge the critical role they play in exposing information those in power would prefer remained hidden.
Crikey stands in support of Freya Newman, and all whistleblowers who risk their personal freedom to expose corrupt behaviour by those in power.
52 thoughts on “Crikey says: we stand with Freya”
Matt Hardin
October 23, 2014 at 7:42 pmThe facts of the awarding of the scholarship suggest that the scholarship was very rarely awarded and that there was no transparency in the awarding of it, also the institutute (or the class of institutions that it was part of) received favourable government treatment subsequent to the awarding of the scholarship. This to me suggests corruption and hence Ms Newman’s actions are those of a whistle blower. She is to be admired for the courage of her convictions and the fortitude to accept the consequences.
Norman Hanscombe
October 23, 2014 at 8:00 pmMatt Hardin, many scholarships aren’t pouring from some metaphorical fountain, but it might help us understand your mission better if you explained what you meant by “very rarely”. Ditto re what you meant by suggesting there was a lack of standard “transparency”. As for alleged “favourable government treatment” allegedly received by whatever “class of institutions” you have in mind, since this allegedly occurred afterwards, providing a plausible case for your thesis it was a bribe really does need some basis for your overall quaint thesis.
Announcing she deserves praise for what appears to many as a politically motivated vindictive action is essential IF you’re right and she is a heroine.
David Hand
October 23, 2014 at 10:30 pmY,
Give me a break.
Abbott is NOT my hero. I am NOT an Abbot lover.
But every day, I get my Crikey email and it is an unrelenting stream of vitriol aimed at Tony Abbot for real, perceived and imagined sins.
I you want me to stop criticising this lefty ghetto rag for its unrelenting inner urban green left crusade against Tony Abbott, get them to write about something else.
I’m not holding my breath.
Norman Hanscombe
October 23, 2014 at 10:52 pmDavid, I’m relieved to learn you’re not holding your breath. Carried out to excess results can prove fatal. Perhaps you might benefit from someone holding your hand as a calming influence so that you don’t misunderstand what people are saying.
As someone who was fighting Left causes probably long before you were thought of let alone born, I’d hope you would sympathise with my plight of having to endure absurdist ‘progressive’ left idiocies day in, day out. On the other hand, if you wish to influence people who might be susceptible to changing their positions on important complex issues, I’d recommend you reconsider the advisability of continuing your current style of relying primarily upon, shall we say, enthusiastic mantras.
drsmithy
October 23, 2014 at 10:54 pmThough I agree that if it were not the prime minister’s daughter Newman may well have not been in court today, the hacking was a direct attack on the stability of the Coalition government. Rather than whistleblowing it was designed to damage Tony Abbott’s reputation and make the process of government more difficult. If it were not the prime minister’s daughter, this activist would not have hacked it.
If it can damage the stability of Government, it is, pretty much by definition, dealing with issues serious enough that “whistleblower” is a suitable term.
David Hand
October 23, 2014 at 11:45 pmAbsolutely wrong doctor.
The media today is replete with stories that destroy people’s reputations that have no basis in fact but which deliver eyeballs ears to media organisations. So Newman’s crime is genuine. Actually I don’t think it has damaged the Abbott’sreputation very much because there is a story every single day that says essentially the same thing but it was unambiguously designed to do so.
drsmithy
October 24, 2014 at 12:23 amThe media today is replete with stories that destroy people’s reputations that have no basis in fact but which deliver eyeballs ears to media organisations.
What facts are in dispute ?
David Hand
October 24, 2014 at 12:36 amFrom my point of view, no facts are in dispute doctor.
AR
October 24, 2014 at 5:45 amSurely the failure to enter details on the Register of Pecuniary Interests has been investigated and the PM censured over his failure (at best) or deceit as normal?
Oh look, up in the sky, it’s a B/S timewaster, it’s a troll.. it’s Porcus Aviatrix!
PS Crikey, is there any way to receive notifications of thread comments that is screened for verbose pests?
Norman Hanscombe
October 24, 2014 at 7:37 amdrsmithy, surely you can’t be unaware of examples of this in the media? Don’t you have access to standard media sources?