Journalism

Oct 13, 2014

Note to Sharri: students aren’t passive information sponges

The Australian's "exclusive" on the apparent left-wing brainwashing in uni media courses sells students short, writes UTS J-school student Max Chalmers.

It’s an exciting time to be a student of journalism in Sydney. Sure, the digital editing workshops can be a little dull, and there’s little pleasure to be found spending your evenings pacing the long corridors that wind around the University of Technology Sydney’s high-rise towers. But thanks to the intrepid efforts of The Australian’s media columnist Sharri Markson, we all know there’s a lot more going on behind the doors of Sydney’s media classrooms than the sleepy expressions of classmates in my 6 o’clock tutorials would let on.

Today, Markson had a fresh scoop, an “exclusive” revealing the indoctrination occurring at two of Sydney’s major universities, both prolific producers of media studies graduates. Cleverly disguised, Markson went undercover to get the inside word on what was being taught to students in media degrees at the University of Sydney and at UTS. She sat in on some lectures, she read some course materials. In the spirit of deep, hard-hitting reporting, the piece ran with a selfie of Markson dressed as a university student. It was classic Woodward and Bernstein stuff.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions

20 comments

Leave a comment

20 thoughts on “Note to Sharri: students aren’t passive information sponges

  1. Bob's Uncle

    Was this Sharri’s first experience attending lectures for a journalism degree? This would explain quite a lot.

  2. klewso

    Sharri, not everyone is happy to have a lobotomy as a prerequisite to employment……

  3. SusieQ

    One assumes New Corp is happy to accept graduates from both of these course? Maybe they have to do an internal ‘re-education’ course first??
    You have to wonder whats wrong with the poor old Oz these days – they have the government they want in Canberra, so instead of reporting actual news or breaking actual stories, they seem to be endlessly casting around for someone to pillory, be it left leaning women, the ABC, the Greens etc

  4. Luke Hellboy

    Just a continuation on News Corpse/LNP war on facts, knowledge, education and especially introspection.

  5. paul holland

    As employers they are merely showing how those with an open view to society are not welcome at their rag. Those with independent ideas might as not even think about applying for a job, after all they have been more than happy to fire those who did have them.

  6. Yclept

    Strangely, even though I don’t attend uni, I’m getting an anti-Murdoch message as well. Manly from buffoons like Markson. Oh well, that can’t be bad…

  7. rumtytum

    “defenceless to interrogate”? “any objection with”? “if this student managed to put up their own independent critique”? “the exact oppose of”? Is this person really a journalist or just Markson in disguise?

  8. Kevin Herbert

    Talk about embarassing yourself in public…BIG TIME.

    What a dolt Markson is.

  9. Margaret Sinclair

    Er. There wouldn’t be any way to study journalism and avoid mention of Rupert Murdoch, would there? Media ownership is very concentrated in Australia. Murdoch papers would draw criticism because they did run a very biased campaign during the 2013 election. If the shoe fits, wear it. But then an independent audit would offer evidence. Much better than opinion. http://www.change.org/p/malcolm-turnbull-please-require-commercial-print-radio-and-televised-news-media-in-australia-to-undergo-the-same-auditing-process-as-the-abc-to-ensure-lack-of-political-bias

  10. The Pav

    Klewso

    Beat me to it.

    Obviously as Sharri is no longer capable of independant that she assumes that nobody else is.

    Of course perhaps Sharri regards balanced observation as being anti Murdoch.

    BTW isn’t there something in the AJA Code of Conduct about concealing a reporters identity….or perhaps Sharri doesn’t qualify …I mean most of News Ltd faild the first three words in the first line and Bolt the whole of the first article

    AJA Code of Ethics1984-present

    Respect for truth and the public’s right to know are overriding principles for all journalists. In pursuance of these principles journalists commit themselves to ethical and professional standards. All members of the AJA section engaged in gathering, transmitting, disseminating and commenting on news and information shall observe the following code of ethics in their professional activities. They acknowledge the jurisdiction of their professional colleagues in the AJA judiciary committees to adjudicate on issues connected with the code.

    1 They shall report and interpret the news with scrupulous honesty by striving to disclose all essential facts and by not suppressing relevant, available facts or by distorting by wrong or improper emphasis.

    2 They shall not place unnecessary emphasis on gender, race, sexual preference, religious belief, marital status or physical or mental disability.

    3 In all circumstances they shall respect all confidences received in the course of their calling.

    4 They shall not allow personal interests to influence them in the course of their professional duties.

    5 They shall not allow their professional duties to be influenced by any consideration, gift or advantage offered and, where appropriate, shall disclose any such offer.

    6 They shall not allow advertising or commercial considerations to influence them in their professional duties.

    7 They shall use fair and honest means to obtain news, films, tapes and documents.

    8 They shall identify themselves and their employers before obtaining any interview for publication or broadcast.

    9 They shall respect private grief and personal privacy and shall have the right to resist compulsion to intrude on them.

    10 They shall do their utmost to correct any published or broadcast information found to be harmfully inaccurate.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...