Crikey Says

Sep 15, 2014

Crikey says: Shorten lacks Crean’s courage on Iraq

The Australian companies making big bucks off war in Iraq. How Cambodia rebuffed Morrison on refugees. Mayne: questions for Packer ahead of Crown AGM. Colombian cyclists in nude fashion faux pas. Why Vic Labor dumped East West Link. The colourful past of Scotland’s ‘No’ man. Sex and death: jihadi brides make for good headlines. Why Shorten’s union schtick doesn’t cut it. And vote aye or die! Groundskeeper Willie’s advice to Scots.

On February 5, 2003, then-opposition leader Simon Crean made the following address to Parliament, in opposition to John Howard’s decision to send Australian troops to Iraq at America’s behest:

“The prime minister has made a great mistake in committing our troops [to Iraq] ahead of the UN. Labor does not support that decision. We do not support the deployment of Australian troops in advance of any UN authority … I believe that political leaders should always tell the truth. This is especially so when committing troops to war. The prime minister failed that test. He treated the Australian people like mugs and he continues to do so.”

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions

10 comments

Leave a comment

10 thoughts on “Crikey says: Shorten lacks Crean’s courage on Iraq

  1. paddy

    It’s quite remarkable just how spectacularly Bill Shorten has managed to disappoint at *every* chance he’s been given.
    Australia currently has the worst PM I’ve ever seen and an opposition leader to match.
    Sad days.

  2. Malcolm Street

    And let’s also not forget Calwell in 1966 – it cost Labor that election but helped lay the ground for Labor in 1969 and 1972.

    Shorten seems to be another who’s p*ssed off at the Greens for standing in the way of the ALP becoming Another Liberal Party.

  3. Bill Hilliger

    Shorten learned from Crean’s (honest intention) mistake. Australian voters love war just watch the polls because rAbbott certainly will be.

  4. CML

    Sadly, I must agree with your editorial.
    Shorten should have done a ‘Crean’, but obviously lacks the equipment!!
    Having said that, IMHO the mood in the community seems to be different from 2003 and the first foray into Iraq. I think the majority see this latest brainfa+t from the rAbbott as just another political exercise – one which he hopes will lift his poll numbers. There seems to be a lot of cynicism about.
    Time for another march in the streets – specifically to tell that lot in Canberra that we DON’T want to go to war in Iraq. But this time someone needs to listen!

  5. David Hand

    Labor have always been suckers for the 24 hour news cycle. It was worst under Rudd but not much better under Gillard or Shorten and certainly NSW Labor, where “announcables” were the main event and substance was optional.

    Abbott stands for something and you can all praise him or criticise him. But what does Shorten stand for? I guess he needs another few Western Sydney focus groups to tell him.

  6. Duncan Gilbey

    Abbot and Shorten – one tail wagging both dogs.

  7. zut alors

    Shorten continues the search for an original idea/policy.

  8. JMNO

    Perhaps Crikey could run a fundraiser to buy Shorten a backbone as he doesn’t seem to have one

  9. klewso

    Here’s hoping it’s a Shortened tenure.

  10. AR

    What an outrage that when Blort Shilten emerges from well deserved obscurity it is only to make himself even more risible.
    I seem to recall someon, 18thC Whig?, saying that the purpose of Opposition is to oppose stupid, damaging & unjust policies and it was not the incompetant incumbent of the office in primus inter pares… all equally useless.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...