"Hockey is right to portray the delay as giving workers more cash in hand. What he won't tell them is that it means they'll also pay more tax in order to fund tax cuts for the government's mining industry mates."Attitudes toward compulsory super have undergone something of a change in public debate in recent years. The vast gouging and self-interest that characterises the retail superannuation industry has been brought to public awareness, not withstanding the best efforts of the industry regulator and the government. The delay announced yesterday occasioned rare unanimity in the super sector, with all parts of the industry lamenting what will amount to a significant reduction in super contributions -- estimated to be between $40 billion and $60 billion, The Australian Financial Review's expert Sally Patten reported today. But that's now coupled with an awareness that that represents a big loss for particularly the retail sector, run by the banking cartel and AMP, which creams off fees that are among the highest in the world and operates conflicted remuneration models that serve the interests of fund owners and financial planners, rather than consumers. Hockey's implication that workers are better off having that money in hand rather than paying it into super funds suddenly seems more sensible, given the Coalition has once again allowed gouging, secret commissions and conflicted remuneration by gutting FOFA. The Coalition's view of super remains deeply conflicted and confused. What was, in the Keating years, a kind of old establishment sense of affront that ordinary workers would be allowed the privilege of superannuation has morphed into a toxic mixture: one part mild libertarian resentment of compulsion, one part vague understanding that our pool of super funds, soon to be $2 trillion, is an important positive for the Australian economy, and two parts fierce resentment of the industry super sector (portrayed by the Coalition as run by "venal" and "corrupt" union officials but in fact overseen by representatives of both employer groups and unions) and the way it consistently and strongly outperforms the private sector funds. Add to that mix the Coalition's eagerness to look after the financial planning industry and the big banks, for which the gutting of FOFA was a key goal in the Coalition's return to government. But Hockey and Cormann's successors in the 2020s, whether Labor, Liberal or whoever, won't look back on the decision to further delay 12% fondly, given it will put further pressure on their budgets via higher pension payments. Worse, it further reinforces the growing unfairness of the super tax system. The low-income super contribution has been retained for a lousy two additional years, while the delay in the shift to 12%, which mainly affects low- and middle-income earners, means the overall super tax system is further skewed toward high-income earners who can afford to pump more of their income into lower-taxed super contributions, then enjoy more lower-tax accumulation of super earnings, followed by greater low-tax draw-down in retirement. Hockey is right to portray the delay as giving workers more cash in hand. What he won't tell them is that it means they'll also pay more tax in order to fund tax cuts for the government's mining industry mates. And all the while, high-income earners continue to coin it via the super system -- thereby deepening the so-called "fiscal emergency."
End of the mining tax guarantees more tax for the poor
The government's delay in lifting compulsory super contributions means low and middle income earners will pay more tax.