Aug 7, 2014

The frantic and exhausting life of a parliamentary media adviser

Former Greens staffer Colin Jacobs offers a glimpse into the life of a parliamentary media adviser -- one of the most influential denizens in the corridors of power.

Your alarm goes off at 5am. As you slowly come to groggy consciousness, you feel the sense of subdued panic that greets you every morning. You regret staying up until midnight waiting for the online papers to change over, but after watching Lateline you were too wired to sleep anyway. Before you even open your eyes, you try to make sense of what the radio announcer is saying as you reach for your phone to scan the headlines. The professional in you hopes there is a big story and you can start the ring around of breakfast and talkback radio. Another part of you longs for a quiet day and a tap of the snooze button.

Welcome to the life of a parliamentary media adviser. The people who live this lifestyle — if you could call it that — are among the most numerous and influential in the corridors of power. Their purpose is to shape the information you consume and to slant your thinking towards their tribe. It is a constantly changing, moment-to-moment existence, and everything that happens in Parliament House revolves around them one way or another.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

7 thoughts on “The frantic and exhausting life of a parliamentary media adviser

  1. Yclept

    Just as we all thought, a BS jungle…

  2. paddy

    Good piece.
    Esp that final para.
    (These days, it applies to the punters as well as the hacks.)

  3. Dogs breakfast

    “Given all that, there is nothing illegitimate about the media adviser’s calling. The public need to know what their representatives are up to”

    Yeah, I baulked at this. There isn’t anything particularly legitimate about it either, and given that they spend a lot of time condensing longer articles into dot points, ensuring their masters know what to say but not leaving a clue of what they are talking about, it is a reasonable argument to suggest that they are the embodiment of all that is evil in the western democratic world. George Brandis’s recent failings are exactly what you would expect of this sort of environment, legislators pushing legislation on issues that they don’t have the slghtest clue about, with no onkling of why they are actually doing it. Surely we could invent robots who would do the job of parliamentarians better and with more substance, and so much less corruptible.

    Sure, that might over-state it, slightly.

    Personally, I’d like to know that my representatives were far too busy acquainting themselves with knowledge, facts and options, and didn’t have the time to be media massaged, or spend all day and night at functions that support causes both worthy and less so.

    In fact, I’d like them to be virtually invisible except for the sweat on their brow, a furrow from concentrated thinking, and a genuine desire to actually do their job rather than appear to be looking like they could be capable, sometime in the distant future, of attending to the possibility of actually doing their job.

  4. JohnB

    Not a good piece at all.

    What did we learn from this? That politicians are insanely busy and that they surround themselves with spin doctors who are also insanely busy? As if we didn’t already know that George Brandis is incapable of delivering a message, or that Tony Abbott is so scared sh_tless that he might actually say something that he ends up being incapable of saying anything at all?

    Or that the Leader of the Opposition is waiting till he receives something he actually understands before he will be prepared to open his mouth and to… actually… make a statement.

    I want the hundreds of spinners to drop dead so that we can actually see the politicians behind the fog of spin and lies.

    Colin Jacobs, I have a job that is right up your alley. Great hours, 6:30 am to 4pm, excellent job satisfaction, because every day you can see what you have achieved.

    Come to Singleton, NSW. I need help digging post holes for a few km’s of fencing. You will be back to your family and a beer before sunset. What’s wrong with that?

  5. Kfix

    Their purpose is to shape the information you consume and to slant your thinking towards their tribe.

    The reason media advisers and journalists understand each other so well is that they are the same people.

    …there is nothing illegitimate about the media adviser’s calling. The public need to know what their representatives are up to…

    JohnB, I’m with you. What a pile of crap. Don’t hold your breath waiting to get some honest work done with any help from someone who thinks like this. How does that third quote sit with the first? Who doesn’t see a problem with the second?

    there is something slightly absurd in the fact that those who work so hard to shape our media … can hardly bear to see the end product.

    What a coincidence. I have the same reaction to the final product. It’s the same reaction I have to the final product of any mammalian digestive process.

    The smell is about the same.

  6. dr felonious

    “By the time the media cycle is coming to a close in the afternoon, there can be precious little time and energy left over for a policymaker and their staff to see to other matters.”

    Other matters, like making policy? That is, the thing they were actually elected to do!?

    Reads like the author believes the running around like a headless chook to serve the daily news cycle is substantially more important than actually developing worthwhile policy.

  7. Colin Jacobs

    @JohnB, Kfix: I maintain that it is legitimate for policymakers to spend time and effort on communicating with the public, and the mass media is often the only way to reach significant numbers of people, the same people who are affected by policy changes.

    Has the preoccupation with media gone too far? Does it impact on policymaking and other more productive activities? That’s for you to decide after reading this account of the daily routine – but I’m quite surprised if it came across as a strong defence of the status quo regarding media management in politics.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details