Crikey Says

Jul 30, 2014

Crikey says: rampant suppression orders an affront to free speech

Rundle reveals how the Coalition is shafting its own base. A DFAT insider on why Bishop’s UN moment was no triumph. The WikiLeaks suppression order that no one can talk about (but everybody is). Asylum seeker plane blocked from flight-tracker. Stilgherrian on the lie of ‘native’ advertising. Today Tonight not strictly accurate (surprise). AFP website hack. Mumbrella takes its bat and ball and goes home. And Bettina Arndt’s hot tips for online daters.

Today’s publication by WikiLeaks of a Victorian Supreme Court suppression order demonstrates once again how Australian, and particularly Victorian, courts and lawyers are stuck fast in the 19th century in their attitude to both citizens and technology. It’s an example of how the legal industry persistently acts as a gatekeeper for information it believes ordinary citizens can’t handle. The case involved, which Crikey has been advised not to refer to, is one of considerable public interest. The allegations involved are serious. And it’s all just a Google search or a quick visit to the WikiLeaks site away. But no Australian media outlet can publish the text of the order. Instead, we're forced to treat readers like children. Even so, hundreds of people in both Australia and other countries have shared the link and commented on the case. Does that constitute publication? According to Crikey’s legal boffins, it’s certainly “not without risk”. “The question of whether retweeting a link constitutes republication of what’s in the link, like many areas of social media liability, remains unclear. However, it’s fair to say that if you retweeted a link about a matter so notorious, you’d be playing with fire,” our legal contact said. That hasn’t stopped a number of high-profile figures on social media doing just that:

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

5 thoughts on “Crikey says: rampant suppression orders an affront to free speech

  1. dazza

    Incredible.. Where’s our Tim Wilson on this.. come out come out where ever you are.

  2. CML

    Well I’ve been on a certain website today so am fully informed.
    The courts are becoming a joke if they think ANYTHING can be suppressed in this age of the Internet!!!

  3. klewso

    Emma Allberici – last night’s Lateline – mentioned NPA? Anything to do with that 4 Corners report, Sep 30 last?

  4. klewso

    About the same time DFAT was up to it’s arm-pits shovelling AWB?

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details