Jul 9, 2014

I despise the World Cup, and I’m not ashamed to say it

Soccer is ludicrously corrupt and fundamentally silly. And that's why I not ashamed of admitting I hate the World Cup, writes Bernard Keane.

Bernard Keane — Politics editor

Bernard Keane

Politics editor

As events in Brazil draw to their close and the departure of most of the teams involved removes what personal stake people feel about it, I now feel able to give vent to the white-hot rage that has been dammed up inside me for so long. I despise the World Cup. Not dislike it. Not hate it. But viscerally loathe it. Yes, yes, I know, I'm a grump, and I hate pretty much everything, but I actually have good reasons for my reflexive fury. First, there's the nature of soccer. Really, this is the least of my reasons for disliking the World Cup, because there's undoubted skill and grace involved in the sport. I played it myself, proud captain of my under-9s team, and my own kids played it. But fundamentally, let's be blunt, it's a silly sport. Human beings have four limbs, but this match, 10/11s of the time, pretends we only have legs. The moment when William Webb Ellis famously, and no doubt apocryphally, picked up the ball at Rugby in 1823 is a sporting moment comparable to the ape-men touching the monolith, or Dave Bowman entering the stargate, in 2001 -- a huge sporting evolutionary leap for humankind. Then there's the accompanying silliness, like the flares. Soccer fans are always letting the flares off in the stands. What on earth is it with flares and soccer? Are they so bored with the lack of scoring they want planes overhead to send rescue teams? Is there some weird historical connection between yachting and soccer that I don't know about? Where do you even buy flares from? Who started with the flares? Was there a William Webb Ellis of the flare? WHAT IS WITH THE FLARES?! And the dives. Even ardent soccer fans will agree the whole diving thing materially degrades the sport. Although I do like the dives where the diver doesn't just theatrically hit the turf, but then proceeds to writhe in unspeakable agony, perhaps with the occasional glance to see if he's successfully milked the penalty. Such amateur dramatics can be entertaining, of course, but the problem is they appear to decide the whole outcome of even the most important matches. But hey, look, all sports have their ridiculous aspects. At least soccer doesn't have scrums -- 12 people (or, in rugby, 16!) bend over and shove their heads between each other. Ugh. It's just ... so buttocky. No, I really despise the World Cup because FIFA is probably the world's most corrupt organisation. OK, I know, I know, the Los Zetas drug cartel, the Calabrian ‛Ndrangheta and the Olympic movement might demand a recount, but it's hard to go past an organisation that impoverishes whole countries as the price for the honour of hosting its quadrennial revenue-spinner. The current World Cup is reaping US$4 billion, tax-free, for the Blattercrats of FIFA, while Brazil is blowing $14 billion hosting the thing. Even just bidding for the thing costs serious money as well, as Australia discovered when it wasted nearly $50 million bidding for a World Cup that Qatar secured through bribery. The soccer World Cup is the ultimate repository -- or probably suppository -- of what I call Major Event Mathematics, that branch of applied maths beloved of consultants and sporting administrators, in which hosting large events produces double-digit economics multipliers and magically erases negative signs in front of numbers. FIFA, like the Olympics, is so corrupt it taints mathematics itself. OK, I can hear you say, sure, FIFA's a bunch of crooks, whatever, but can't you just enjoy a game that brings pleasure to so many billions of people? That's a bit like saying "look, the cocaine trade is one riddled with violence, corruption and exploitation, but can't you just enjoy this snort?" And, yes, I take the point about how billions of people around the world enjoy the World Cup. As an economic liberal, I can't laud market outcomes everywhere else and then complain that soccer is so successful (OK, I could, but then I'd be the sort of half-arsed selective economic liberal I'm always complaining about). But it doesn't mean I have to overlook the profoundly toxic global phenomenon that lies behind it. And it doesn't mean I shouldn't offer the one piece of advice that every soccer player should be told: "Pick the bloody thing up and run with it." OK. Fire away.

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

77 thoughts on “I despise the World Cup, and I’m not ashamed to say it

  1. mikeb

    Yet another penalty shootup. That sums up what is wrong with the game itself. Goal area needs to be increased or similar to increase the chance of scoring. How many times do you see a side with 80% of the attacking play lose due to a lucky goal?

  2. beachcomber

    Time to resume the medication Mr Keane.

  3. Steven McKiernan


  4. John Taylor

    Brilliant article Bernard. I grew up with soccer as it was the only sport in our small UK country town – but when I got the opportunity to play tennis, hockey and volleyball – soccer? Meh. It has as much watching and playing appeal as tiddleywinks in mittens (although the latter would have greater skill. Seems to me watching any level of soccer that it is 90 minutes looking for the opportunity to pretend you are hurt.

  5. Cleaner

    The distinctive feature of soccer is that it is the only sport in the world where the players deliberately use their head to hit the ball. Therefore I propose that the from now on its official name be headball.

  6. rubbersoul1991

    It’s not only soccer, but all professional sport that sucks. It’s all full of corrupt commercial interests and I couldn’t give a f#$k about any of it.

  7. Liamj

    I do wish people would stop confusing corporatised entertainment with sport.

  8. Professor Tournesol

    Shame, the political editor of Crickey reduced to trolling. What a shame I’ve just renewed my subscription.

  9. robert lattanzi

    I have just subscribed to Crikey about 10 minutes ago and this is the second article I’ve read.

    I have a right mind to cancel my subscription!!! I do not need to pay $19 per month to read this misinformed, inward looking, island mentality garbage!! I can get this type of populist tripe by reading the News Corp press.

    Bernard, are you by any change related to Rebecca Wilson??

  10. Madmeg

    Nice trolling Bernie. Just thought I would make it an even 70 for you! 😉

Leave a comment

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details