Jun 26, 2014

The politics: Palmer delivers a big win for climate denialists

Ignore the theatrics: Clive Palmer has handed the government a big win in its efforts to dump effective climate action.

Bernard Keane — Politics editor

Bernard Keane

Politics editor

We can talk endlessly about Clive Palmer’s stunts, his penchant for theatrics, his seemingly effortless ability to command media attention. To do so is, to a degree, to co-operate in the way he relentlessly trivialises politics. Or more, correctly, the way that he pushes the trivialisation that has occurred in recent years to new, lower depths, for Clive is merely the hypertrophied form of contemporary politics, pushing the spectrum of stupidity ever wider.


Leave a comment

22 thoughts on “The politics: Palmer delivers a big win for climate denialists

  1. philro

    Its all very confusing after reading all the differing articles.

  2. klewso

    Palmer trivialises politics for fun – like op-ed hacks, masquerading as journalists, are paid to do.

  3. wilful

    BK really needs to read Cathy Alexander’s explainer since it’s clear that he hasn’t really got his head around this issue. Methinks Cliev is becoming another of those annoying blind spots that the otherwise excellent Mr Keane has a few of.

  4. zut alors

    Announce a major policy… then run for it! Superficially, Clive didn’t appear to be in urgent need of a meal but perhaps I do him an injustice.

    Surely a policy touted as potentially ‘saving the world’ would warrant at least five minutes of questions.

  5. Pedantic, Balwyn

    Bernard may have lost the plot yesterday on FT indexation, but he’s right back in form today.

    One of the most powerful articles I have read calling out Palmer on his hypocrisy in supporting the destructive policies of the Coalition in repealing Carbon Pricing. But to be fair maybe Palmer doesn’t know it morphs into his preferred ETS next year anyway?

    Also a timely reminder that the Coalition is riven with denialists and most will be happy to scrap both the “toxic” Carbon Tax and Direct Action, cause there isn’t a problem, is there!

  6. Iskandar

    Al Gore followed in behind Clive looking like a stunned mullett. Probably he was badly jet-lagged and had only just perused a PUP briefing paper on what this Clive fellow was all about. Consequently he was cooked like a goose. Hopefully after a good nights sleep Gore will realise how he was duped and make some sort of retraction.

  7. JohnB

    Well written, Bernard.

    Especially the “all headline and no story” comment. How true!

  8. klewso

    There’s got to be a mourning after….
    (or was that The Poseidon Adventure?)

  9. Hunt Ian

    Bernard’s sentiments about the player’s in the Palmer stunt seem to just not quite appreciate how funny it is to see Clive upstage everybody on climate change. While Bernard’s dismissal of Clive’s antics has a lot to it he fails to see how annoyed the climate deniers will be and supposes that the whole thing is a triumph for the climate deniers.
    Well, it is not. The one bit of direct action worth keeping, the RET, will be kept till after the next election. An ETS will be kept with an amendment to give carbon a zero price for the time being and other bits of machinery around the ETS will be there till after the next election.
    Not much will indeed be achieved if Bernard is right in supposing that the Republicans will control The US Congress forever and that Abbott will get reelected in 2015. Though MSM in both the US and Australia will be pushing for this result, it is not clear that Australians will accept the influence of MSM as much in future as they have in the past. Chin up, Bernard.

  10. Graeski

    I’m not sure which is the scarier thought: that behind the bumbling facade there’s actually a razor-sharp intellect manipulating the media and public like a master puppeteer pulling on the strings; or that the public face is fundamentally true to the inner man and reflects a genuinely uninformed mind and lack of considered political philosophy or intellectual framework.

    I guess time will tell, but neither bode well for the country.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details