Northern Territory

Jun 23, 2014

Muckaty opponents on dangerous ground: the NLC responds

Northern Land Council media officer Murray McLaughlin responds to claims made in Crikey last week by opponents of the shelved Muckaty Station nuclear dump.

In his Crikey story on Friday, Paddy Gibson writes: “Unfortunately, (Northern Land Council Chief Executive Officer Joe) Morrison has tried to blame the litigation itself for ‘divisions’ in the (Muckaty) community.”

If Gibson is seeking to deny that the case did serve to exacerbate divisions among the clans which comprise the Muckaty Land Trust, then he must have been deaf to the proceedings in the Federal Court at Melbourne, Muckaty Station and Tennant Creek over the two weeks beginning June 2.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions

1 comments

Leave a comment

One thought on “Muckaty opponents on dangerous ground: the NLC responds

  1. Damien

    Hi Murray,

    If the NLC is so concerned about either party or their supporters referring to evidence which was adduced during the proceedings , but not subject to the full court process including determination by an independent Judge due to the settlment, then why did the very first paragrah of the NLC’s / Joe Morrison’s statement attempt to do so?

    We all know that the evidence of the Traditional Owners, both filed and heard in chief during the proceedings, was that the consultations were improper and did not satisfy the legal requirments of the Aboriginal Land Rights Act NT.

    If you attended the Court hearing as you claim, you would know this was never resiled from and alot of evidence was put on about this. You will also know that the judge made absolutely no findings as to any matters of evidence prior to the settlement.

    Yet, the NLC in the very first paragraph of its media release by Joe Morrison claims that the applicants “own evidence” agreed that the NLC’s consultations were “proper”.

    What absolute and utter horseshit, and you know it.

    You are also on “dangerous” grounds making such claims.

    I suggest you take some of your own advice and stop trying to relitigate the issue by way of the media, in some vain attempt to improve the image of the NLC in this matter.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...