Jun 6, 2014

Who’s to replace Chris Mitchell? Rumblings over Oz editorship

The Australian's editor-in-chief has suggested there's no-one in the company to replace him. Is this news to his editor?

Myriam Robin — Media Reporter

Myriam Robin

Media Reporter

News Corp journalists are questioning whether The Australian editor Clive Mathieson will remain with the company after editor-in-chief Chris Mitchell suggested there was no one ready to replace him at a media and marketing conference in Sydney on Wednesday. Many within the Oz had speculated that Mitchell would retire after the 50th anniversary celebrations in July this year, after he said as much to Crikey in 2012. But earlier this year, he told Crikey he'd be there "another two or three years at least". This morning, he said in an email that "management has changed at News Australia since 2012 so things are better now," adding that his plans are exactly as he told Crikey in February. Mitchell made further off-the-cuff comments about succession at the paper on Wednesday after being asked about it by a Mumbrella reporter. He said he would retire when a successor was ready. “I would like to have clearly defined successors who I felt were ready for it," Mitchell said. "There is a tradition in newspapers, I don’t particularly mean in News Corp but generally, of throwing good journalists into a job that they are completely unprepared for ... When I feel that it is ready, I will move on." Later, Mitchell added: "one of the questions when I move on is do I feel my successors are committed [to the paper’s values]." This has been read by some to mean Mitchell does not believe Clive Mathieson is ready to take over as editor-in-chief, despite Mathieson having been editor of the paper since 2011 and having led various sections of the paper since 2002. Crikey understands Mathieson has no plans to leave the paper, but some have said Mitchell's comments seem to indicate Mathieson is no longer viewed as a successor. Crikey asked Mitchell this morning whether his comments indicate he does not believe Mathieson is ready for the job. He responded:
My plans for Clive and Michelle [Gunn, managing editor of The Weekend Australian] have been unchanged for years and remain unchanged. I said the paper and the digital businesses need to  be in good shape and my successors ready. Clive and Michelle agree with all that."
Mathieson is well liked by staff and seen as the natural choice to replace Mitchell. The two work closely together and are seen as a strong team despite their radically different personalities. Any disputes between the two generally do not bubble over into the newsroom. Mitchell has been editor-in-chief of the Australian since 2002, and after running through his no-doubt exhausting daily schedule ("6.30am in the morning to 12 at night"), said on Wednesday that the thought of retiring was "appealing". If it's not Mathieson who takes over when Mitchell does eventually retire, others have suggested Peter Fray -- a surprise appointment to the Oz in February -- may be in the running. Fray is a former editor of the Canberra Times, Sunday Age and Sydney Morning Herald, and as deputy news editor, is in a relatively junior role at The Australian given his experience. Crikey understands he’s become very well liked relatively quickly, and is viewed as a safe pair of hands. However, as a Fairfax alumni, some muse he’s not enough of a right-wing campaigner to be considered for the role. Others nominated current Daily Telegraph editor Paul Whittaker, who held Mathieson's current job before moving to the tabloid, as another possibility. Gunn's name was another mentioned as a potential successor. While none of the insiders called by Crikey believed Mitchell would be retiring anytime soon, several also said they couldn't rule it out, describing Mitchell as ultimately inscrutable. "I think he'll be around forever," one mused. "Every couple of years this story about succession heats up, but I think he enjoys it too much. The 50th anniversary would be a logical time to go, but if he doesn't want to, there's no pushing him."

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

9 thoughts on “Who’s to replace Chris Mitchell? Rumblings over Oz editorship

  1. Harry Held

    Does it really matter? I don’t think anyone takes the Oz seriously any more.

  2. Luke Hellboy

    Exactly. As long as you spout whatever rubbish Lord Rupert decrees, a trained dog could do it. Or maybe a trained Poodle, post-parliament

  3. DiddyWrote

    The Australian is losing $30 million a year (every year at least) under Mitchell, who has transformed it into a partisan propaganda sheet.

    In any other business this idiot would be out on his ear but in the la la land of Murdoch he’s seen as a success.

  4. Interrobanging On

    John Pilger?

  5. Liamj

    Alan Jones seems to have what it takes – gutless bully, shameless sycophant, amoral egotist.

  6. klewso

    If censorship is the height of vanity.
    If “The bludger should never be our national icon” – with the amount of “News Corpse welfare” it soaks up – let it go Rupert.
    Is it really worth it?

  7. Nonda Pass

    Does anybody read The Australian any more. I don’t think it matters who is editor because nothing will change whoever it is.

  8. Steve777

    The Australian used to be a serious journal of record. Its editorial position has always been centre-right – fair enough – but it did provide accurate reporting and analysis of the news. It also had an interesting stable of colmnists with views across the political spectrum.

    This has changed in recent years. The Australian now has no more credibility than its tabloid stablemates. It seems to operate as a propaganda vheicle for pushing its proprietor’s business and political interests and attacking his enemies.

    There should be no trouble finding some syncophant withint the Newscorp organisation who will attend to his master’s voice and continue to plug the company line.

  9. green-orange

    ===“I think he’ll be around forever,” one mused

    But will “The Australian” ?

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details