Jun 5, 2014

Keane: our oversight of intelligence is broken

The refusal of the Inspector General of Intelligence and Security to acknowledge major concerns about spying on East Timor reflects how broken our system of intelligence oversight really is.

Bernard Keane — Politics editor

Bernard Keane

Politics editor

Our current system of accountability for intelligence agencies is broken, and hopelessly inadequate for an era of mass surveillance. Here's why. Vivienne Thom is the "Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security", whose role, the Inspector-General's office maintains, is to provide "independent assurance for the Prime Minister, senior ministers and Parliament as to whether Australia's intelligence and security agencies act legally and with propriety by inspecting, inquiring into and reporting on their activities." [my emphasis] As Crikey reported recently, the strange case of Canberra lawyer Bernard Collaery -- representing East Timor in its dispute with Australia over the Timor Sea Treaty -- has brought into question public statements by Dr Thom, which appear to contradict a statement by Collaery that have now been incorporated into Hansard following a parliamentary attack on Collaery by Attorney-General George Brandis. At issue is whether a former Australian Security Intelligence Service approached the former IGIS -- Ian Carnell -- and sought advice in relation to his role in the bugging of the East Timorese cabinet room in 2004, an operation intended to advantage Australian resources companies -- and whether Carnell recommended that the whistleblower obtain legal advice, which he then did. Senator Nick Xenophon tried to explore this in a late night exchange last week in Estimates hearings with Dr Thom. The first issue was whether Thom was being completely truthful when she asserted, as she did in December, that no former ASIS officer had ever approached her or Carnell about the East Timor issue. There would appear to be a prima facie case that Thom's statement is wrong. Collaery's statement refers to correspondence to and from Carnell, and incorporates specific details and dates that are readily checked. But Thom refused point blank to discuss the matter when Xenophon raised it. Their exchange continues for an extended period; the persistent theme is that Thom simply refuses to accept that there is even a reason to go back and check the IGIS records or any discrepancy between her statement and Collaery's.

(Click through to see a bigger version of the image)

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

2 thoughts on “Keane: our oversight of intelligence is broken

  1. klewso

    Did this happen at sea?

  2. AR

    I could just go back through the archives and cut’n’paste my comments every time this issue arises but to what point?
    Acton’s axiom about Power & Corruption is often quoted but the lesser known corrollary about secret power is less often added.
    It is ludicrous (and insulting to even the semi-sentient) to assert that spooks don’t act illegally and now Crikey finally states it plainly – “the mass surveillance that ASIS, the Australian Signals Directorate, ASIO and the AFP are already practising and want to legitimise“.
    If the operatives were highly ethical it would still be unacceptable but, as anyone with experience of them knows, most spooks are damaged personalities – whether they were so when signing up or whether the job caused the psychois is debateable but moot, the malign effects on civil liberties is the same.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details