Journalism

May 8, 2014

‘This is what’s left’: Fairfax journos down tools amid threats and fear

More than 600 Fairfax staff across the country are on strike, after the company announced dozens of redundancies.

Myriam Robin — Media Reporter

Myriam Robin

Media Reporter

There's the usual number of Fairfax newspapers today, but not the usual number of bylines. More than 600 Fairfax staff across the country are on strike, after the company announced it was sacking most of its photographers and half of its remaining subeditors, along with 15 lifestyle journalists. Not turning up to work this morning are journalists from The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Canberra Times, The Newcastle Herald and the Illawarra Mercury. Between 100 and 150 staff were milling on the lawn outside Media House, where Fairfax's major Melbourne bureaux are located and the home of The Age, just after the walkout was announced. I asked a senior Age journalist, "is that everyone?" He shrugged his shoulders. "There were 500 people working here a few years ago," he said, surveying the gathering. "This is what's left." But it wasn't everyone. While the "vast bulk" of staff from The Age and SMH walked out en masse, from the top to the new cadets just two weeks into the job, only the unionised half of The Australian Financial Review joined them. The Fin will share the cuts in photography -- MEAA delegate and SMH journalist Stuart Washington said "surprising levels" of staff at the more conservative paper are also not at their desks today. In a public statement, Fairfax expressed disappointment with those who had gone on strike:
"The company had commenced a meaningful consultation process about the proposed changes and has planned further briefings with affected employees and their representatives."
The internal email sent to staff was more forceful. Allen Williams, the managing director of publishing media at Fairfax, reminded staff that industrial action during the period of an industrial agreement was not protected, and given the "unnecessary disruption" to the business caused by the strikers, "we want to make the company's position very clear". The position is that, in addition to docking the legally required minimum of four hours' pay for the action:
"... the company will also consider taking disciplinary action against those employees who participate in any unlawful action, which may include the termination your employment. There is no difference between participating in an unlawful strike and simply not attending for work without a proper reason. We consider both examples to be an unauthorised absence, damaging to your mastheads and a breach of your legal duties to the company."
Furthermore, Williams continued, "employees should not feel intimidated or pressured into taking industrial action". As executives hurled off emails, the staff gathered on the Media House lawn were quiet, and sad. One journalist asked when the cuts would stop. "It'll be Epicure next," she said. "Where's the line?"

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions

1 comments

Leave a comment

One thought on “‘This is what’s left’: Fairfax journos down tools amid threats and fear

  1. Yclept

    Management haven’t heard them because they aren’t listening. Same old “executive class” bullies as at every other corporation. None of them are worth the exorbitant salaries they drag in because they aren’t capable of fresh thinking or actually running their businesses efficiently. I won’t be buying any of their publications now and I stopped buying News Crap long ago.

    Fairfax may as well just make them all redundant and pack up shop because the print media is no longer relevant.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...