Apr 9, 2014

Fairfax sorry for the ‘throw away’ racist cartoon that made it to print

A Fairfax newspaper has run a cartoon poking fun at African people for having fat lips, rejected elsewhere for being "too offensive". The Bendigo Advertiser has offered a full apology.

Cathy Alexander — Freelance journalist and PhD candidate in politics at the University of Melbourne

Cathy Alexander

Freelance journalist and PhD candidate in politics at the University of Melbourne

The Bendigo Advertiser, a Fairfax daily newspaper, took a stand against racism yesterday with this piece:

The column stated:

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

6 thoughts on “Fairfax sorry for the ‘throw away’ racist cartoon that made it to print

  1. zut alors

    Editors deemed it “too offensive”?

    I’m bemused by “too”. How about purely and simply “offensive”.

  2. Cathy Alexander

    Interesting point Zut – that it’s ok to be offensive, but only to a certain degree? But then that comment is from the artist, who doesn’t think it is offensive at all

  3. Mel Campbell

    Very unfortunate for Maddie Wines that her editor let her down like this. Her column comes from a well-meaning place and really doesn’t deserve to lead a story on racism as if Wines herself was being hypocritical.

    I would be mortified if my name showed up in a Crikey story in a similarly negative context only because my editor was asleep on the job.

    Perhaps another pertinent issue is the HR drain that leads to syndicated content being slapped in, production being outsourced on a piecemeal basis, and hence nobody seeing the broader picture until it’s too late.

  4. Roberto Tedesco

    Another cartooning problem, this time from Germany:

    This hasn’t made a lot of news, being outside the Anglosphere and all that. What’s particularly offensive is the imagery is a virtually direct copy of what passed for “comment” in Germany between 1933 and 1945

  5. Cathy Alexander

    Thanks for that link Robert – I hadn’t seen that. The cartoonist said he ‘meant to show “a cartoon depiction of the company Facebook beyond a specific person,” and explained that the image shows Facebook’s purchase of WhatsApp and “is a combination of an octopus from the film the Pirates of Caribbean.”
    Do you find that convincing?!

  6. Michael McEnaney

    The whole anti “stereotype” rant is a waste of time. Whether it’s racism, sexism or any other “-ism” you are talking about, it has to be discussed bearing in mind that using “stereotyping” is how the human brain stores vast amounts of data. When you meet a new person, for instance, your brain sorts information about that person in various categories or classifications (just other words that mean stereotyping without the value-added connotation). These categories would include skin colour, gender, age, body shape, height, accent, clothing worn etc. etc. This is how we make sense of the world around us. How you get people to classify other human beings without adding their own value judgement to each “category” I don’t know – but I tend to believe it’s just not possible.
    Should we get a laugh out of “stereotype” jokes or cartoons? Well some will and some won’t. We have all laughed at stereotype jokes of some sort – Irish jokes, Scottish jokes, mother-in-law jokes, blonde jokes, bogan jokes. Why? Because we identify the stereotype to begin with. Do you really want to put comedians out of work?

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details