Apr 4, 2014

Clown prince: how Clive Palmer bought himself a WA media frenzy

Palmer's spent half a million on ads. And for those who don't watch ads, he's spent weeks playing the buffoon, earning him more coverage than any other party running on Saturday, write Myriam Robin and Ania Dutka.

There are two schools of thought when it comes to the antics of billionaire mogul Clive Palmer. One is that he's a ludicrous buffoon. The other sees a method to his madness. After investigating his profile in the weeks leading up to the second Western Australian Senate election in seven months, Crikey is inclined to believe the latter. When it comes to mentions in the national and WA media in recent days, Palmer is everywhere. And while he insists his WA candidates are always available to do media, he's the one fronting the cameras most of the time. It makes sense -- he has a national profile already, and his candidates are very much riding on his coattails. That means he's been in the news more than any of the actual candidates from any party running in the WA election, according to iSentia figures. He's mentioned five times as often as the Greens' Scott Ludlam (1042 mentions in the past two weeks, compared to Ludlam's 229) and has totally blitzed the mentions given to the Sports Party (just 29 in the past two weeks). If we limit our search to just WA, iSentia says Palmer has been mentioned 171 times in the local media. That compares to 116 mentions for the Liberal candidates, 94 mentions for Ludlam, 81 for Labor's runners and 17 for the Sports Party. In WA, Palmer is mentioned half as often as national Opposition Leader Bill Shorten (on 355 mentions) ...

Media mentions regarding WA senate election (National)

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

22 thoughts on “Clown prince: how Clive Palmer bought himself a WA media frenzy

  1. mikeb

    Palmer did the same thing in Tasmania and the result was embarassing. Despite all the money, quirky ads, publicity spots they achieved nothing. They weren’t helped by sub-standard candidates who shot off like loose cannons and Palmer himself has a knack for presenting as a rich bombastic fool (if amusing at times). Telling some call-back listener on air that he is right because he has 8 billion dollars and she doesn’t was the highlight of his campaign.

  2. JayDee

    So let me get this right, a one man political party spending big in political advertising is questioned and is considered ‘news’ by the MSM but the MSM giving a free ride to a political party at the last Federal election is not. Yep, there is something seriously wrong with our so called democracy when it is hijacked by mining or media billionaires. Spare me the rhetoric when we get on our high horses and lecture developing countries on the democratic process.

  3. Aphra

    JayDee has a point but I hear that the under 20s in WA are plugging for Clive as he’s ‘cool’, and here’s why —


  4. Mark Duffett

    Hold the phone…isn’t it almost as extraordinary that the Greens have spent more than Liberal and Labor combined?

  5. prodigy

    Sorry, he is a buffoon marked more by his antics and crassness than intelligence and vision.

  6. Raaraa


    Don’t forget that Labor and Liberals have non-party ad spending helped by the unions and big businesses on top of the combined total of $116k (as estimated by Ebiquity).

  7. zut alors

    One hopes West Australians caught Palmer & Garnaut on last night’s Lateline. Palmer made little sense, was relentlessly repetitive & even managed to tell his beloved Tony Jones to “shutup” twice. Having loudly professed Jones to be his favourite & most admired journalist in Australia one can barely imagine how boarish he is to people he doesn’t revere.

    @ Aphra (#3), don’t underestimate the apathy of young voters. I had a theory our internet-addicted youth would overwhelmingly support Rudd’s NBN but somehow Turnbull’s sluggish patched version has prevailed.

  8. William Bowe

    For the record, I expect the Palmer United vote to be a good deal higher than the 5.9% attributed to me here — more like 10%, in fact.

  9. Bill Parker

    AS one who doesn’t watch television ( except iView and SBS) and certainly don’t waste money on newspapers, I can’t say I have noticed Palmer. Frankly I couldn’t give a bugger what the media say about him.

    The fact that he saw fit to gag his Senate candidate last Tuesday night was a joke.

  10. Venise Alstergren

    Palmer has exactly the sort of rough hewn, “Shucks honey I’m wearin’ my good suit,” false hokum, “Dang it where did I put my hat?” ersatz hillbilly charm that is beloved by our country cousins. (Joh Bjelke-Petersen had it in spades.) The ladies of the CWA would lurve his persona
    and the men would admire his smarts.

    Now let us see if the rest of the voting public has more intelligence that the average man and woman in the boondocks.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details