Re. "China Trip an all-star affair
". Yesterday we stated Jennifer Westacott was the outgoing CEO of the Business Council of Australia. Of course, she’s not going anywhere; it was recently announced Catherine Livingstone would replace Tony Shepherd as president. We’re happy to correct the record.
Ian Wright writes:
Re. "Hand on heart
" (Friday). I remember, back in the late '50s, when hats were worn by most men and the WWI diggers were still marching strongly (most only in their 50s) on Anzac Day, my late father (served in both WWI and WWII) instructing me in this same gesture of civilian respect for military ritual.
purely an American custom, it used also to be seen in the UK, and I have read anecdotes of its enforcement by British Military Police in the British Occupied Zone of Germany as regimental colours were paraded through the streets of occupied towns and cities before the establishment of the Federal Republic (West Germany) in (I think) 1953 (or was it '57?).
It was during the "Youth Rebellion" of the late '60s and early '70s that the custom, like standing in flm theatres for the British national anthem, fell into disuse. I'm no advocate for its return, but let's get the history and provenance right.
Shining a light on impending Solargate
Ken Lambert writes:
Re. "Risk? What risk? The fossil fuel industry walks both sides of the street
" (yesterday). Giles Parkinson totes out the predictable mantra of the green industry. The consensus is a nonsense -- the basics of climate science are not settled as evidenced by the recent discovery of an amazing symmetry of the Earth's hemispheric albedo -- a result not predicted by any climate model, and poised to rewrite the "science" of climate modelling.
There is plenty of something else going on in the earth's climate system producing the stasis in surface temperatures despite steadily climbing CO2 emissions, little of which is explained by current models.
Climate science robustness is a fiction heavily oversold by the alarmist climateers to frighten the crowds and keep the grants flowing.
Solar energy successful -- yes, for the owners with heavy government subsidies paid for by the non-solar panel consumers of inflated electricity costs. Cheap Chinese panels have exploded all over Australia -- with no redeemable warranties because most of the solar spivs have hit the toe or are buried in a maze of trusts and legal entities under the expert supervision of the likes of the Gillard-Rudd government.
Will these panels last 10, 15 or 25 years? What is enough life to justify their real cost? What testing did Rudd-Gillard government do to establish the quality and durability of all the multitude of Chinese panels subsidised in Australia? What happens if they and their cheap inverters start cracking up prematurely? Will Gillard be able to help -- a pro bono legal case run from Adelaide Uni against the solar spivs perhaps? Will Rudd run a Harvard Business seminar on his experience with batts, boats and solar panels? Tune in for the entirely predictable Solargate fiasco coming soon to a roof near you.