Mar 17, 2014

Australian dollar shot as currency cold war turns hot

It's been a wild ride for the Aussie dollar. Here's one theory as to its recent path -- and what's likely to happen next.

Since the global financial crisis, a currency cold war has been raging as Western central banks have sought to restore decades of lost competitiveness via dramatic monetary easing. The primary culprit and he who fired the first shot was the United States Federal Reserve. First by crushing its interest rate to zero and then via successive rounds of quantitative easing, the Fed engineered a material fall in the US dollar from 2009 to 2012. The campaign was interrupted by a flight to safety in 2010 around the European crisis but was ultimately very successful, deflating the world’s reserve currency by some 17% over the period:

Until late 2012 the war was fought on only one side. But at the conclusion of that year, Mario Draghi was elected to the head of the European Central Bank and he launched Europe’s first counter-strike with his own versions of QE. The Fed was snookered and the US dollar rebounded. To this point, the war was largely disguised by weak economies and the strictures of central bank code but it turned more overt late in 2013 with election of Shinzo Abe and his appointment of Haruhiko Kurodato to the Bank of Japan. Abenomics, as it is now called, openly sought currency debasement as a path to re-inflation via huge and un-ending QE. The results have been spectacular with the yen depreciating some 40% since:

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

6 thoughts on “Australian dollar shot as currency cold war turns hot

  1. Aidan Stanger

    How much better would our manufacturing industry be now if the RBA had followed a more sensible policy?

  2. Jimmyhaz

    Fantastic Article.

    I thought that this

    ‘At least publicly, they maintain the view that they are either powerless in the face of “markets” or that they are ill-advised to intervene because “markets” are always right. But it’s not “markets” that are holding up the dollar, it’s the effect of realpolitik upon markets.’

    was particularly poignant, as it speaks to underlying inter and intra-national truths.

    Thank you for that, David.

  3. JohnB

    Great stuff. Worth reading twice or more. I’ll be visiting Europe in two months. Memo to self: Buy some Euros asap. The renmimbi can wait.

  4. R. Ambrose Raven

    Note how reality has become irrelevant to discussion of the very few politico-economic instruments our ideologues choose to permit us to use to keep something of our industry, employment, and our society.

    Whether the cuts to the one stone motherless last interest rate set by the RBA have achieved any useful purpose is irrelevant; all that matters is that they occur. Even that assumption itself is challenged by its own unreal observation – the risk of a housing bubble (amongst other things) due to excessively low rates – when it is already here. Further, the interest rate trend is assumed to decide the trend of the Pacific peso. Finally and far the worst, this strange view that our economy will automatically rebalance as the dollar fluctuates; even stranger, the views that any such rebalancing will automatically lead to “rebalancing growth”. Even Milton Friedman never went that far.

    Six years after the start of the Global Financial Crisis (which very few of these genius economists forecast), there remains this steadfast monetarist mindset, impervious to experience, that all that is required to restart endless idyllic growth is to find exactly the right monetary policy settings. Once there, crank the handle, all aboard the gravy train, and off we all (well, the filthy rich, which is the only group that matters) sail into the sunset.

    It is not just silly but self-destructive to promote policies so counter-productive. Choosing failure has many more consequences than success merely being an opportunity cost.

    We have, for instance, a government of bumptious oafs for whom – especially in foreign matters – arrogance is clearly a much preferred substitute for performance. In their re-casting of reality, their contempt for any useful action is in striking contrast to the costs and challenges of Peak Oil, Peak Water, Peak Commodities, Peak Food, and Anthropogenic Global Warming – costs that due exactly to that denial and inaction are exponentially increasing! Its evil can be measured not only by the incredible costs of the asylum-seeker neurosis but also the Noalition’s eagerness to monger extraordinary outbursts of hate.

  5. chrisguynoel

    Lots of charts and lots of arguments as to why the Aussie should be lower. No analysis as to why the Aussie has continually rebounded. The market is what the market is and no amount of argument is going to change that. Thirty years of buying foreign currency has taught me that there is not always an apparent logic in the movement of currency markets. Fortunately modern financial services can provide some medium term protection for trading businesses against sharp currency movements. The RBA is one hundred percent right not to intervene in the market -the Aussie is among the top six traded currencies on the world so any intervention RBA could finance would be futile against the daily traded volumes. This article, like so many others, works from the assumption that we have a weak economy when in fact the Australian economy is one of the most vibrant and adaptable in the world. We need to ensure through economic reform that we keep it that way – although the timid governments of the later Howard years and Rudd / Gillard certainly did not really contribute in this area.

  6. Aidan Stanger

    chrisgunoel #5

    How can you say the RBA is right not to intervene in the market when the reason the market price is so high is because of the RBA’s decisions? The RBA set the intereest rates much higher than other countries, artificially boosting the value of our dollar.

    Metaphorically our economy is as strong as an ox, but the RBA’s been treating it as if it were as strong as an elephant! Many of our manufacturers, and even some primary producers, are unable to compete with their overseas counterparts. That probably wouldn’t be a bad thing if it were the result of our dollar being pushed up by a trade surplus. But it isn’t – we have a big trade deficit. The RBA has been paying speculators to park their money in Australia, and that has boosted the dollar’s value. It means we’ll import more and export less, pushing the value of the dollar down. And as overseas interest rates start to recver, the speculators will find another country to park their money in and our dollar will fall further. So the high dollar will eventually result in a low dollar – but by then a lot of our manufacturers won’t be around to take advantage of it.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details