"News of the breach reduced traffic at Target stores during what was already going to be a difficult holiday period."Target initially sat on news of the information, as it discovered the breaches just days before Christmas. It was only the enquiries of security blogger Brian Krebs that forced Target to disclose the malaise. Target offered customers a 10%discount on all products the weekend before Christmas. It did not stem declining sales figures. News of the breach reduced traffic at Target stores during what was already going to be a difficult holiday period. Target CEO Gregg Steinhafel was mostly absent from the public throughout and was criticised discreetly by company directors, who described him as "publicity shy". Even before the data violation, Target was not having a great year. Buffeted like many American chains by the defection of once loyal customers to the web, it also embarked on what has proved to be a costly expansion into Canada, marked by heavy financial losses. Last week, the retailer announced staff cuts across the company. For Neiman Marcus, known for its premium clientele, personal shopping assistants and overall discretion, the breach is wildly embarrassing. It too fumbled its announcement, having received information of the problem in mid-December but declining to make any public announcement until January 10. It was Brian Krebs again whose report forced the company to move. Even then, it was not until last week the chain revealed the full damage. In a statement on its website, Neiman Marcus said malware had been clandestinely put into its system and had stolen payment data off cards used from July 16th to October 30th. Credit card fraud has risen 70% in the US since 2010. According to Nilson, although the US accounts for 27% of all credit card charges worldwide, a whopping 47% of credit card fraud takes place here. The Target and Neiman Marcus scandals have increased calls to adopt the use of smart chips now common in Europe and Australia. Target, interestingly, attempted to introduce high-security smart-chip cards at its terminals a decade ago, but pulled out after worries around costs and slower checkout times. Retailers say the investment in infrastructure required to adopt the technology will not cover the cost of the fraud begin committed. According to one estimate, credit card fraud costs about five cents per $100 spent on cards in the US. However, credit card companies here have told retailers they need to have the card readers in place by the end of 2015. If they don’t, they will be liable for data stolen and fraudulent charges made. In the current environment, it’s not just credit card and retailers at risk, with Coca-Cola another high-profile victim. The soft-drink giant revealed last week a former worker had stolen personal data involving 74,000 employees, contractors and vendors. Tellingly, stock prices have already started rising on companies such as VeriFone, which manufactures advanced payment hardware. VeriFone’s stock is up 27% in the last month. It could also be a boon for security and credit-monitoring groups.
Consumers Target-ed: the US retail data-mining scandal
Hackers managed to steal data about millions of customers from retail giant Target at the tail end of last year, and the effects are still being felt. Are Americans about to get serious about personal financial security?

Join the conversation
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login or sign up for a FREE trial to engage in the commentary.