Jan 28, 2014

Essential: voters down on privatisation and the unemployed

Voters remain deeply opposed to any privatisation, even of things they've never heard of, this week's Essential Report shows. And the view that the Newstart payment is too low isn't widely shared by voters.

Bernard Keane — Politics editor

Bernard Keane

Politics editor

Australians continue to strongly oppose privatisation, and don't share the view of business and welfare experts that unemployment benefits are too low, new data from Essential Research has found. Privatisation is regarded as a bad idea by 59% of voters, and while Labor and Greens voters more strongly oppose it, it's a fairly universal sentiment: only 31% of Liberal voters think it's a good idea. For specific organisations, the dislike is even stronger. The sale of Australia Post is opposed by 69% of voters; the sale of the ABC and SBS 64%; Snowy Hydro (jointly owned by the federal, New South Wales and Victorian governments) opposed by 53%. The sale of Medibank Private, which the government committed to before the election and which is now in preparation, is opposed by 54% and supported by 29% -- and much of the opposition is of the "strongly opposed" variety. Even the sale of the Australian Rail Track Corporation, which the majority of voters wouldn't have heard of (it owns or manages access to the interstate rail infrastructure) is opposed by 58% of people. Voters have more mixed views on the level of welfare payments, but plainly believe there is good and bad welfare. Twenty-four per cent of voters believe we spend too much on welfare while 41% say we don't spend enough and 27% say it's about right; Liberal voters are much more likely to believe we spend too much on welfare. But most voters -- 64% -- believe the age pension is too low, while only 27% believe unemployment benefits are too low -- the same number who think it is too high. The view that Newstart -- now so low even business lobby groups have urged it be increased -- is too high reduces somewhat when voters were told how much it actually is: 25% say it's too high, but the number who believe it is too low increases to 35%. The number of voters who think the parenting payment is too low increases significantly when they actually know the figure -- belief that it's too high falls from 31% to 26%, and the number who believe it's too low increases from 23% to 34%. Sixty-five per cent of voters also want to make eligibility for unemployment benefits tougher, while only 17% want eligibility for the age pension made tougher. Voters have also bought the media line about alcohol and violence: 78% of voters believe alcohol-related violence is getting worse, which flies in the face of the actual experience of NSW. And there is strong support for the O'Farrell government's package of alcohol-related measures: 87% support harsher mandatory sentences for alcohol-related assaults; over 60% support earlier closing times for bottle shops, pubs and clubs; 76% support lockouts and 59% support lifting the age at which you can buy alcohol (the Australia Medical Association has floated lifting the legal to drinking age to 25). In each case, support among NSW voters is a little stronger than support from Queensland and Victoria voters. The only nanny state measure that voters don't approve of is lifting taxes on alcohol -- that's opposed by 55% of voters, and supported by only 38%. On voting intention, the Coalition has slipped a point and is now on a 42% primary vote; Labor has also lost a point and is on 36%. The Greens remain on 9% and Clive Palmer's party remains on 4%. The two-party preferred outcome is 50:50, from 51:49 in the Coalition's favour last week.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

3 thoughts on “Essential: voters down on privatisation and the unemployed

  1. MJPC

    So, I read from this: Abbott will look after his Liberal Party mates in big business by selling off lucrative public assets and business entities in spite of the lack of support from the majority of the proletariat.
    Now, can someone tell me what gives him the right to do this in a democracy?
    Maybe that’s the problem, the theory and practise of democracy ends with the election of politicians.

  2. CML

    @ MJPC If this privitisation goes ahead as you say, then doesn’t that mean that the individual politicians are NOT representing their electorates? But you need to get that across to the bogans who voted for them.
    Good luck with that!

    BTW, welcome back, Bernard!!

  3. Chris Hartwell

    Seriously? Lockouts, earlier closures and age limitations aren’t deemed “nanny state” but raising the tax on alcohol (or perhaps even taxing by volume? Maybe one day) is? What?

    Christ, no wonder the ETS and pricing of carbon has been so hated – folks don’t understand what “nanny state” actually entails.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details