Jan 24, 2014

Kevin Andrews, don’t pick on the disabled and those on the dole

Hands off people on the dole and disability payments, but wind back the age pension. That's what experts told Crikey about welfare reform as the government prepares to slice and dice.

Cathy Alexander — Freelance journalist and PhD candidate in politics at the University of Melbourne

Cathy Alexander

Freelance journalist and PhD candidate in politics at the University of Melbourne

The Abbott government plans to crack down on disability payments and the dole, but is it targeting the wrong welfare recipients? Experts have called for the age pension -- which costs almost five times as much as the dole -- to be wound back first. Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews recently flagged big changes to the welfare system via his regular bulletins in The Australian. He described the system as "unsustainable ... the two big areas are Newstart and the DSP [Disability Support Pension] in terms of ensuring the viability and sustainability of welfare in the future". Crikey asked four experts about this plan and found none thought it was a good idea. So we crowned them minister for the day and asked how they'd reform welfare (and perhaps save some cash). The most popular response was to wind back the age pension or target superannuation concessions. Some suggested making the disability support program and dole work better, rather than cutting them back. By way of background, Andrews has hinted the May budget would tighten eligibility for new recipients for the DSP and the dole, with more changes later. The government has a couple of reviews reporting back soon. While Prime Minister Tony Abbott has talked about banning the dole for people under 30, and a Nationals MP recently said people on the dole were out to "screw the system", the only concrete proposal is to stop allowing people on the dole to refuse a job if it's more than 90 minutes away. Andrews has ruled out changes to the age pension -- and why not, given that older people tend to vote for the Coalition? At the September federal election the Coalition nabbed 51.8% of the primary vote from the over-50s (Labor got 31.1%). Among the 18-34 age group, the major parties polled about the same (36.6% Coalition, 36.1% Labor). The dole (aka Newstart) is $501 per fortnight (plus up to $124 rent assistance if eligible, and other top-ups). The DSP is $751.70 per fortnight (plus a supplement of $61.70 if eligible), the same as the full rate for the aged pension. Here's what our experts would do about welfare ...
"If government wants to slow the growth in welfare expenditure, the age pension is the main game."
Cassie McGannon, fellow at the Grattan Institute: wind back the age pension "If government wants to slow the growth in welfare expenditure, the age pension is the main game," McGannon told Crikey. It costs $36.4 billion a year, 10% of the federal budget. The dole costs $7.6 billion. McGannon's issue with the age pension is generous indexation and changes to rates and eligibility, making it "relatively untargeted". Older households with million-dollar assets may still get part of the pension. "These people are relatively wealthy, they're doing a lot better than a lot of the people on DSP and Newstart," she said. Grattan wants the government to include owner-occupied dwellings in the pension assets test, and the institute calculates this would save $7 billion a year. Households in this situation but with low cash incomes could get the pension but would accumulate a debt to the government against their property (like a reverse mortgage). Grattan has also suggested lifting the age pension and super age to 70. McGannon says it "seems shortsighted" for Andrews to rule out changes to the age pension; "you're really limiting your options". Chris Richardson, economist and partner at Deloitte Access Economics: cut middle-class welfare Richardson says the welfare system needs reform, but "I'd focus more on middle-class welfare". Industry welfare and top-end tax breaks should be reined in, too. He says the DSP could be looked at, particularly eligibility requirements, and says it is concerning that people who stay on the dole for a few years often end up on the DSP. But the dole should not be restricted. "The unemployment benefit is too low," Richardson said. He'd increase it, and would not make it a pressing task to reconsider eligibility for the dole. Rather, Richardson thinks Andrews should look at the way people on higher incomes access the age pension. Older Australians who have travelled well financially in the last decade and self-funded retires -- many of whom are comfortably off -- are getting good help from the government. The system should be more targeted towards people in need, Richardson told Crikey: "You do want to look at assistance to older Australians." Nicholas Gruen, economist and CEO at Lateral Economics: rein in super Gruen says the government should be vigilant about welfare payments, but the expansion of disability payments is a global trend "and has proven very intractable". He suggests expanding work-for-the-dole but notes that would cost the budget money, in the short term at least. The best way to reform the DSP and the dole is to engage much better with individuals and communities -- a question of capability, not cutting back budgets. "Actually responding to people and communities on their merits is something that not just governments but large organisations everywhere find immensely difficult," he said (he's written on the subject here and here). In terms of cutbacks, "we could save a vast amount of money by tightening up superannuation concessions and taxing them more progressively", Gruen reckons. Natasha Cortis, research fellow at the UNSW's Social Policy Research Centre: make the dole work better Cortis does not support restricting eligibility for the dole. "It's already been tightened in recent years, and affords only very low payments for those who can access them," she told Crikey. But the system does need reform. The real problem is that many job seekers are transitioning to casual, temporary or seasonal work, or jobs without enough hours. "We should be looking at the poor quality of work at the lower end of the labour market," Cortis said. The government should work up programs to improve the quality of these jobs, particularly for people in disadvantaged areas. Perhaps the government could help employment services to work with employers on this. Cortis says employment services should be overhauled to provide better support to people once they do find work, to help them keep it. "Employment services tend to work to strict KPIs and caseworkers are often underqualified, which doesn’t help," she said.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

54 thoughts on “Kevin Andrews, don’t pick on the disabled and those on the dole

  1. The Pav

    But the disabled and vulnerable are the perfect targets to fund tax cuts to rich corporations

  2. SusieQ

    Yes, target the poor and disabled, they don’t vote Liberal. Lets face it, one of the first things the government did was drop the superannuation changes for the rich – ok to exent welfare to them!

  3. Jimmyhaz

    There is absolutely nothing unsustainable about the state of our welfare currently, in fact, the payments currently made are too small, as they don’t allow recipients to meet their non-discretionary spending needs.

    I’m amazed it took less than 6 months for this government to show their true colours, they have never been about fiscal responsibility or budget surpluses, from the start they have been about cutting government spending to those they see as undeserving. They are followers of a sick and diseased ideology, and the sooner we can excise them from Australia forever, the better off we will be as a nation.

  4. MJPC


    You have said it in one. Out esteemed PM is over in Davos sprouting the lie of free trade and business unfetterd by Government regulation.
    Hold on, was’t the world almost bought to the brink in the GFC by free marketeers and lack of banking regulations, governments letting big business have a free hand?

  5. Cathy Alexander

    Interesting observations in the comments. I asked Essential to crunch some recent numbers for you which might give more insight into Coalition policy pressures re income and age. Based on their online polling in December and January:

    * the primary vote among people earning less than $600 per week (which would include people on the dole and DSP) is 33% Coalition, 42% Labor,

    * among people earning over $1600 per week, it’s 47% Coalition, 35% Labor.

    Essential also did some more work on voting by age bracket (the Newspoll results are in the article). Among the over-65’s, roughly the age at which the pension kicks in, Essential found the Coalition at 56% and Labor at 30% (primary, December to January). So the Coalition has a very high level of support among voters of pension age.

    Thought you might find this interesting.

  6. Jimmyhaz

    I’m amazed by the third of the under $600 a week group that voted coalition, it kind of reminds me of the gay hardcore republicans that I met in LA. I guess the Republican party and the LNP have something else in common, an ability to make people vote directly against their own interests.

  7. Electric Lardyland

    I don’t know, Jimmy, I suspect that quite a few Coalition voters earning under $600, would’ve probably swallowed the talkback and tabloid Kool-Aid, that their jobs have been taken by those queue jumping refugees.

  8. Jimmyhaz

    Ooft, you’re right, I totally forgot about all those cushy yet high-paying jobs being stolen by the illegal boat people. While we’re here, can you point me to the queue for these jobs? I have two skiing trips at the end of this year that aren’t going to pay for themselves.

  9. Bill Hilliger

    Some say the old age pension should be cut by 30% and supplemented by food stamps to make up the 30% cut. Just like what happens in the USA. This would cut needless and wasteful expenditure by pensioners on poker machines and tatts-lotto. Additionally to create more employment by the job creators the diesel fuel levy to miners and other extractive industries should be increased by 30% to create extra employment by being more competitive in world markets

  10. Bob the builder

    Given our economic system is predicated on a certain level of unemployment, i.e. it’s designed that way (witness the panic in the financial press when unemployment gets “too low”), surely we can treat those who are unemployed a bit better. And as for work for the dole, people on it are either displacing paid employment, hence increasing the unemployment rate, or doing meaningless work, in which case it’s purely a mean-spirited punitive scheme, punishing people for being part of a group of people (the unemployed) who are created by design.
    I think the dole should be at least doubled – it’s disgracefully low at the moment.

Leave a comment

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details