Journalism

Jan 17, 2014

Where the Tele and SMH agree: violence and media beat-ups

The Sydney Morning Herald andThe Daily Telegraph agree that Sydney needs stronger measures to combat alcohol-fuelled violence. But is their campaign worth the paper it's printed on?

Matthew Knott

Former Crikey media reporter

For more than a century, Sydney's two dominant newspapers have been fierce rivals -- despite stark differences in their world views and target audiences. Reporters at The Sydney Morning Herald, a fixture on Sydney's affluent north shore and eastern suburbs, have long looked down at their Daily Telegraph competitors as ethically dubious beat-up merchants. At the Tele, which dominates Sydney's sprawling west, Fairfax types have been dismissed as smug and self-important. But since teenager Daniel Christie was struck down in Kings Cross by a one-punch assault on New Year's Eve, the papers have marched in lockstep by campaigning for the New South Wales government and wider community to get tough on alcohol-fuelled violence. For 17 days straight, the cry has rung out from the front pages and editorial columns: something must be done. Prime Minister Tony Abbott weighed in last week with a front-page column for the Tele; today, the Governor-General attended Christie's funeral service. Such sustained campaigning by both papers on a single issue is unprecedented in recent times, according to former SMH editor Peter Fray. "Campaigning is easier for the tabloids -- they're virtually on a permanent campaign footing," he said. "The really interesting thing about this is that the Herald is matching the Tele blow-for-blow." The coverage is heaping enormous pressure on Premier Barry O'Farrell to act -- which he has seemed extremely reluctant to do. The SMH's Safer Sydney campaign is calling for 1am lockouts and 3am closing times in trouble spot areas such as Kings Cross. The paper is also offering $2500 to the reader who can create the best advertising campaign against alcohol-fuelled violence. Meanwhile, the Tele's Enough campaign is calling for the following:
  1. Be a real mate -- take responsibility for each other and stop violence
  2. Mandatory minimum jail terms for punches that cause death or serious injury
  3. 1am lockouts across the Sydney CBD
  4. More trains to get people home quicker
  5. Review liquor licences annually, and charge on a risk basis
  6. Ban the sale of alcohol 30 minutes before the venue closes.
The Tele upped the ante today with a story headlined "Lock these grubs up", showing 93% of respondents to a survey want minimum sentencing for one-punch crimes causing death.

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions

9 comments

Leave a comment

9 thoughts on “Where the Tele and SMH agree: violence and media beat-ups

  1. klewso

    “You tacitly promote belligerence, intolerance and intemperance as acceptable de rigueur, then complain when it’s taken too far”?

  2. Itsarort

    The irony here is that the real culprits of intentional violence on our Friday and Saturday nights are, on any given day, more likely to be found in the gym, not the pub.

  3. MJPC

    Plus of these campaigns, seeing O’Farrell squirm in interviews when questioned about alcohol sponsorship of the LNP (plus some really biting cartoons in the SMH);
    Negative, they will come to nothing for 2 reasons: the AHA (Australia’s equivalent of the NRA when it comes to political clout) would crucify any political party that suggested harsher measures needed, such as no alcohol advertising etc (they have done it in Canada). One only needs to look at the Pokie reforms to see how the mis-information campaign would be fought. O’Farrell is in the pocket of the AHA so far any comments to reform the process will be lies!
    2: The papers won’t go too radical when those juicy liquor adverts are threatened. Notice that their campaign is against pubs, not liquor outlets (most owned by Woolies/Coles). Best not bite the hand that feeds their advertising revenues. Capitalism = corruption (social and moral).

  4. Pete from Sydney

    MJPC, most people who buy booze at liquor outlets take it home, not to Kings Cross to consume

  5. AR

    Klewy – for a moment I thought you were referring to TT’s ‘bop the stoats” axiom as it fits both foreground 7 inevitable result.
    I cringe when I see the magic word “drugs” sliding into the alcohol violence slogans. The main drug causing the violence, apart from good ole booze, is steroids closely followed by speed.
    Yet, as any tabloid consumer (one can hardly call them ‘readers’) knows, “DRUGS” mean.. errr.. dope, that well known precursor of mayhem.

  6. Bill Hilliger

    The AHA won’t like any campaigns that point to alcohol related violence. the media won’t either, if it affects advertising income. MJPC is right on the mark.

  7. klewso

    Who got in the mud and validated and endorsed Toady Abbott’s “whatever it takes/winner take-all” m.o. more than Murdoch’s Limited News?

  8. Thteribl

    Has the full-page advertising by the liquor giants dropped off over January ? Just considering the advertising revenue.

  9. poppy41

    Check out Saturdays Illawarra Mercury for information re the programme running successfully in this area re alcohol fueled violence.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...