Menu lock

Federal

Jan 10, 2014

Pyne’s culture warriors: curriculum reviewers ‘lack credibility’

Christopher Pyne has charged Kevin Donnelly and Ken Wiltshire -- harsh critics of the national curriculum -- to ferret out "bias" in classrooms. Their appointments have come under close scrutiny.

Matthew Knott

Former Crikey media reporter

As the Abbott government launches a sweeping review into the new national curriculum, the country’s curriculum chief has rejected claims that a partisan progressive agenda is being foisted on students.

And the lead writer of the national history curriculum has blasted Education Minister Christopher Pyne’s choice of reviewers, saying they lack credibility and expertise in the area.

Pyne announced this morning that two of the curriculum’s harshest critics — education consultant Kevin Donnelly and Queensland University public administration professor Ken Wiltshire — will review the national curriculum. Pyne says a review is needed to ensure the curriculum is “balanced in its content, free of partisan bias and deals with real-world issues”.

Historian Stuart Macintyre, lead author of the national history curriculum, told Crikey he was alarmed by Pyne’s appointments. “I don’t think Kevin Donnelly has any credibility at all,” he said. “The book he wrote, Dumbing Down, is almost illiterate — it shows a deplorable lack of understanding of education and curriculum.”

Macintyre says he’s also concerned that Donnelly — a former chief of staff to Liberal MP Kevin Andrews — has been tasked with ensuring the curriculum is free of partisan bias. Regarding Wiltshire, Macintyre says he is not regarded as an expert on school curricula (Wiltshire, it should be noted, chaired a review of the Queensland school curriculum for the Goss Labor government).

“Christopher Pyne has been banging this drum for several years — I think he believes there is political mileage in reigniting the culture wars,” Macintyre said.

Barry McGaw, chair of the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), strongly defended the national curriculum this morning, saying it has been subject to years of rigorous debate and review. National curricula for English, maths, science and history up to year 10 have been agreed by all state and territory ministers and will begin being implemented in NSW this year.

Asked whether it’s fair for critics to assert, as Donnelly has, that the national curriculum was mandating a “cultural Left” agenda for schools, McGaw told Crikey: “No, I don’t think it’s fair. For example, there has been a lot of misrepresentation of the role of cross-curriculum priorities [Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander history and culture, engagement with Asia and sustainability] — including by Judith Sloan on Radio National this morning.”

McGaw says these areas will only be addressed where relevant and barely covered, if at all, in courses such as mathematics. And there has been a strong back-to-basics approach to English. “In English we have reinstated a stronger emphasis on grammar and other aspects of language — stronger than currently exists in most state curricula,” he said.

McGaw says Donnelly and Wiltshire are both competent and the ACARA will consider their recommendations. “You can always benefit from review,” he said.

Stuart Macintyre, who has long opposed conservative historians in the so-called “history wars”, predicts the government will have “enormous difficulties” implementing curriculum changes as further tinkering is likely to be resisted by state governments.

“The ACARA used a consultation process that was almost interminable,” he said. “Most of them would say, ‘go away — we’ve spent years getting this right and now you want to go and upset it’ … All [Pyne] has to force their hand is the traditional funding blackmail card, but he has already criticised federal command and control of education,” Macintyre said.

Macintyre also disagrees with claims made by Pyne this morning that there is not enough focus on Anzac Day in the curriculum. “There is a great slab on Anzac already — too much in my view,” he said.

Pyne defended his appointments this morning, saying:

“It’s not possible to appoint anybody to review the national curriculum who doesn’t have a view on education. The important point is to appoint people who are going to bring an intelligent and considered approach to the review, and both Kevin and Ken have a long history and experience in education.”

Kevin Donnelly, head of the Education Standards Institute, defended his track record, telling Crikey: “There are more important issues at stake than personal vitriol. The reality is I taught for 18 years and have postgraduate qualifications — including a masters and PhD — focussing on curriculum. I’m eminently qualified to do this job.”

When asked if he is currently a member of the Liberal Party, Donnelly said: “I am a member of lots of groups … Sorry, I don’t think that is relevant.”

Crikey also contacted Ken Wiltshire this morning but didn’t receive a response before deadline; we’ll add any comment as it is received.

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

28 comments

Leave a comment

28 thoughts on “Pyne’s culture warriors: curriculum reviewers ‘lack credibility’

  1. Interrobanging On

    Ugly. Announce a review then stack it with pre-declared critics. Only one outcome is possible. The fact the curricula have been accepted by all states and territories is irrelevant.

    Then have the bare-faced gall to say it is to remove ‘bias’. It might remove ‘bias’ as maggot-brained right wingers perceive it, but it is solely to replace it with their own bias. Expect a strong ‘Whitewash’ view of history.

    It is a good career move to be a friend of the Liberal Party when writing on the Drum or wherever. Gets you plum gigs with this shameless and cynical mob.

  2. Migraine

    Among the many many things I find disturbing about this: a Minister of the Crown providing the justification for an important announcement via a newspaper opinion piece – as an exclusive – which is locked behind a paywall. Basic accountability would suggest making the piece as widely accessible as possible. Besides – a column to the 37 crusty gentlemen who still read the Oz? Preaching to the choir …

  3. lloydois

    Couldn’t agree more migraine but then as we all know this is not a government that has any concern for the majority of Australians. It’s just a bunch of sad old ideologues playing out culture wars most of us moved beyond some time ago.

    The idea of Kevin Donnelly taking the partisan out of anything is as laughable as Christopher Pyne showing competence at anything he does.

  4. Scott Grant

    Matthew, you are tasked to stay behind after class and write 500 times “I will not use TASK as a verb”.

  5. klewso

    We’ve got Rupert rewriting history, in the media, now Pyne wants to “redecorate” our education system to reflect his personal opinions?

  6. leon knight

    It may take a little while to repair the education system after this clown has finished meddling with it – although basically teachers will continue to do a good job in spite of hare-brained ideas being foisted on them from on high.
    There is a disturbing religious agenda behind all this, as well as the usual LNP paranoia about left-wing bias.
    I was astounded that Pyne could hold down his job as manager of opposition business (even more that Abbott chose him for that task), but he is way out of his depth now. Dog help us……

  7. Barking

    But the real point is this: The country is hurtling toward some serious economic quicksand and these “adults-in-charge” are amusing themselves with culture war frivolities? Dog help us indeed!

  8. Interrobanging On

    Barking,

    Your mistake is thinking that winning elections and gaining power is about good governance when it is really about using the position for ideological battling and social engineering…so St Christopher teaches us.

    Scott, I agree…at the risk of sounding like a codger calling for education to be just like the good old days when men were men, sheep and women were nervous and an Indigenous Australian was a bloody boong.

    Add ‘disconnect’ as a noun too. It’s a bit odd (and definitely unthinking) the way nouns are becoming verbs and verbs becoming nouns for no good reason.

    Anyone using ‘around’ to mean ‘about’ should do lines as well. I am annoyed around people’s use of around instead of about when talking around something.

    On the misuse of words The Guardian today has a video caption making reference to ‘idol curiosity’. Of course, they really mean ‘idyll curiosity’.

  9. klewso

    Abbott was Howard’s Leader of the House.
    A case of a job, for which “…… Those with talent need not apply!”?

  10. The Pav

    Of course we will give you a fair trial before we shoot you