Jan 8, 2014

‘Now it is too late’: bracing for Pacific climate displacement

The impact of climate change means it's probably too late to save islands in the Solomons. So where will thousands of villagers go? Catherine Wilson reports on the looming displacement crisis.

On the islands of Ontong Java in the Solomon Islands (pictured), a South Pacific state three hours by air north-east of Brisbane, time isn’t wasted arguing about climate change. In the main village of Luaniua, islanders have for years witnessed irreversible sea level rise.

It has broken down sea walls, flooded villages, inundated food-producing land and contaminated freshwater wells. Houses have collapsed with coastline erosion, tree cover has declined, increasing human and plant vulnerability to the intense tropical sun, and, day by day, people’s energy is consumed more by basic survival.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

12 thoughts on “‘Now it is too late’: bracing for Pacific climate displacement

  1. Mark Duffett

    Yes, the Solomon Islands region is the locus of some of the highest recent sea level rise on the planet ( However, it should also be recognised that, as Charles Darwin correctly surmised over 150 years ago, the foundations of many Pacific Ocean islands are sinking, via tectonic and isostatic processes:

  2. michael crook

    the climate scientists no longer refer to “climate change”it is now climatedisruption. there is no historical perspective for what is happening now, the atmosphere has suffered irreversible damage. estimates are that there will be NO summer ice in the arctic ocean by 2017, that the calcium based live forms in the oceans such as algae and krill will be under severe threat within 20 years, think about that for the food chain. the latest climate forecasts by the UN are for 3.5 degrees increase by 2050 and 5.5 degrees by 2100, at which point ordinary human life is no longer sustainable. Thank you very much wealthy mining corporations, you have managed to convince successive governments of your lies for too long. it is now too late.

  3. Ian

    So what is your point Mark?

  4. Electric Lardyland

    I look forward to some rightard culture war foot soldier claiming, that no, it’s really that green left permaculture that’s destroying Ontong Java, not climate change.

  5. Mark Duffett

    My point is that I get uncomfortable when sea level rise is presented as being all about global warming, if not incontrovertible proof of it (“time isn’t wasted arguing about climate change. In the main village of Luaniua, islanders have for years witnessed irreversible sea level rise”). It’s not the whole truth. This sort of thing is the reason why so many geologists are off-side with climate scientists (wrongly in my view, but there it is). It’s not helpful in the climate debate to lead with the chin like this.

  6. Ian

    The problem is, Mark that climate change is not a simple phenomena nor does it happen in isolation. All sorts of factors have additional impacts on processes and events effected by climate change, eg clearing, population density and in this case tectonic plate movements.

    The fact is that the most serious concern right now is climate change and that is something we can or at least could have done something about. That is the thing that worries us most and not tectonic movements which are beyond our control. To expect articles written with this problem firmly in mind to then go off on a tangent and to bring in all sorts of other elements that may or may not have relevancy on a matter is really a diversion.

    These sorts of diversions are those we can expect denialists and sometimes genuine skeptics to focus on.

  7. Mark

    Part of the problem with the climate change debate is that on one side are those who are trying to establish the truth, or at least as close as we can get to the truth and on the other side are a group of people who will say anything to advance their agenda without ever being held accountable for what they say. In such circumstances the arguments supporting the evidence for what is happening need to be like Caesar’s wife, above suspicion. This is ever so when there is an argument between good and evil. Not fair, but that is how it is.
    In this case, I am with my namesake, it is a glaring issue to say that sea level is rising 8 mm per year in the Solomons and 3 mm per year world wide. This is physically impossible. The Solomons must be sinking by 5 mm per year. So they have a problem which is being exacerbated by climate change (and, clearly from the article, population growth). It is a pity that the author, like most people, does not understand enough physics to have questioned these numbers. Mark is not being a denialist, he is merely pointing out the truth. And Ian is correct in saying we cannot do anything about continental drift and long term geological processes but we can do something about climate change and population growth.

  8. Mark Duffett

    It’s even more complicated than that – it is actually possible to have 8 mm SL rise regionally and 3 mm globally. As the first URL I gave puts it, “the increase in sea levels in the Western Tropical Pacific (is) due to changes in the Trade Winds. During El Niño years sea level rises in the eastern Pacific and falls in the western Pacific, whereas in La Niña years the opposite is true.” So in a sense the regional SL rise is climate-driven, but isn’t necessarily anything to do with global warming (jury is still out on the ENSO-global warming link AFAIK, certainly the relationship isn’t simple). In other words, a strong El Niño event (which we haven’t had for quite a while now) would relieve the pressure on the Solomon Islanders, as prevailing winds would pile the water up further east in the Pacific.

    For me the article would be considerably strengthened by having a bit less of the local colour and a bit more detail about what’s actually going on. The 8 mm/3 mm discrepancy highlighted by my namesake surely cries out for explanation to all but the most casual reader; hardly irrelevant or a diversion.

  9. Mark Duffett

    Meant to also say a geodetic GPS study of Pacific islands was apparently commenced circa 2008 to look at this issue of land subsidence vs local and global sea level rise, (under the above-mentioned Pacific Climate Change Science Program, I think). Significant results from it should be coming in by now, with over 5 years of data, but they’re strangely difficult to find. If anyone has any pointers I’d be most interested.

  10. Harold Krause

    In 1969, exactly 45 years ago, I was resident in New Ireland Province of PNG. The North side Coral Reef was rising out of the water all along the north coast while the Reef on the South coast was sinking. The area had several Strength 7 + earthquakes each year so how about considering the Tectonics of shifting plates in the region of the Rim Of Fire instead of alleged and easily blamed Global Warming aka Climate Change. Harold Krause, Thursday 09 January 2014.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details