Dec 17, 2013

Which news websites you’re clicking on — or not

Which news websites soared and which flopped in Australia in 2013? Crikey scours the numbers -- and the results may surprise.

Matthew Knott

Former Crikey media reporter

As the UK Daily Mail readies for its assault on the Australian market, a survey of news website traffic shows dramatic fluctuations among the big players over the past year. The ABC, The Guardian and The Daily Telegraph were the big winners while the Herald Sun, The Age and Ninemsn recorded the biggest declines. The rankings, based on Nielsen unique audience data for September-November, suggest two key findings. First: with a smart strategy, putting up a paywall need not crater your website traffic. And secondly, the Gillard government’s decision to amend the ABC charter to include digital services was far more significant than it seemed at the time. The ABC's booming online presence did not cause the commercial media's woes, but it is another headache for outlets desperately chasing digital eyeballs. Populist News Corp Australia site rose from third to first under the leadership of editor Luke McIlveen. No wonder Mail Online has poached him to run its Australian operation next year. nabbed top spot in April and held on for six consecutive months. The site's rise was helped by News’ decision to close opinion site The Punch in March and integrate it into

Nielsen online ratings: unique audience September-November

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

6 thoughts on “Which news websites you’re clicking on — or not

  1. Mendoza

    “Ninemsn news sites dropped from first to third, shedding 14% of their unique audience”

    traditionally ninemsn have relied on page views from people simply logging out of hotmail. hotmail is now outlook and does not automatically load ninemsn on log out, which may explain this figure in some way

  2. Klavdia Shemsuva

    Does this take into account the people who go to SMH, click on a story, hit the paywall, go elsewhere?

  3. michael r james

    Isn’t there an elephant in this room?
    The combined SMH + Age is 4.65 million and leaves all others for dead.

    To me this reinforces what I have advocated (in Crikey) for years and years: they should create a single integrated website. As it is they are almost identical and a single site must surely be more attractive to advertisers? (And presumably BrisbaneTimes and WATimes are also not included in these counts?)

    Second, maybe I am hopelessly incompetent with my browser but the Fairfax sites drive me crazy with their auto-reloading. I am pretty sure there is no way to turn it off. One cannot scroll down the home page before it starts reloading. It also loads slower than comparable newspapers (like Guardian or NYT, and incidentally neither of which use auto-reloading). Consequently I never leave a tab open with either of these sites, which of course means I am less inclined to visit them.

    This also begs the question: I presume that reloading the same page does not register as independent visits (ie. it has nothing to do with these SMH & Age unique visit counts?)

    Single master home-site; no auto-reloading (or give option); fast-loading clean webpages with minimal auto-playing embedded videos (despite often fake option to deactivate). These are basics. What do the geniuses at Fairfax not understand about online audience preferences compared to, say, the top two (world) news sites?

  4. Shaniq'ua Shardonn'ay

    Agreed Michael – mind you I’ve noticed that the mobile version of the AGE + SMH pretty much is the single website. I would also advocate that whoever does the advertising at fairfax get a little more computer literate. Many of the ads placed on the mobile site click through to websites that aren’t optimized for mobiles and impossible to view, surely this would be digital marketing 101!

  5. Northy

    Could the increase in the Tele’s website’s numbers (from a small base) be because ALL of their News Local publications now redirect to Each paper used to have its own website but now they redirect to the the Tele/newslocal once you enter the unique URL. I assumed this was being done to give the impression of an increase in the Tele’s paltry online numbers.

  6. Aidan Stanger

    I think the growth in is largely due to people using it to dodge the paywall. For example, if they put up a story behind the paywall at, you can read it in full just by changing adelaidenow to news in the URL. The trick also works for theaustralian and I presume their other state papers too.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details