
“Silence in the face of evil is itself evil. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.” — Dietrich Bonhoeffer
In Australia there exists a shameful conjunction between injustice and ill-health involving foreseeable, avoidable and possibly irreparable harm to the most vulnerable of all, the legacy of previous Liberal and Labor governments. I speak of the indefinite detention of people — including children — charged with nothing, guilty of nothing, in Australia’s very own Gulag Archipelago stretching from Christmas Island through our remote deserts and on to malaria-blighted islands to our north.
Some of those children have been there from birth, born in Australia but denied their birth right of citizenship, knowing no crib but one bounded by razor wire, denied the protection of the state’s child protection legislation we all take for granted. Considering the abrogation of Australia’s moral, let alone treaty obligations, it seems we could do no worse.
Today we awoke to the news the Abbott government has decided to axe the Immigration Health Advisory Group, or IHAG, established by the Howard government in 2006 after recommendations made in the Palmer and Comrie inquiries into the handling of the cases of Vivian Alvarez and Cornelia Rau. It was populated by well-regarded medical and other health professionals who gave competent and independent advice to whatever government of the day. Therein, I suspect, lay the problem for a government such as that with which we now find ourselves.
Coming hard on the heels of a highly critical Amnesty International report into conditions at the Manus Island detention facility, it begs the question: what have they to hide? I think we know. So does the Australian Medical Association, hardly a hotbed of left-wing social activism.
New research published in the AMA’s Medical Journal of Australia found substantial unmet health needs and levels of psychiatric morbidity among asylum seekers in immigration detention in Darwin. The poor level of transparency and the lack of independent scrutiny of detainees’ healthcare were of major concern. The conditions in Australia’s offshore facilities, where there is even less (now virtually none) independent medical oversight, are even worse.
The Australian government is obliged, as a signatory of the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, to provide the same standard of healthcare to detainees as is available to the general population. Following the Amnesty report, there is little doubt that we are in breach of that convention.
Suicide is the leading cause of death among detainees in Australia, as one would expect from a policy that leaves people in indefinite detention, unaware of their ultimate fate, in conditions arguably unfit for human habitation. If we were to deliberately design a system so cruel as to entice death, we could do no better.
Is it by design, Mr Abbott? Mr Morrison? Or is it simply the wilful indifference, the turning of the blind eye to which Bonhoeffer referred?
In an accompanying MJA editorial, Australian Human Rights Commission President Gillian Triggs wrote:
“… it is often the detention environment itself that causes mental illness … Accordingly, it is the removal of people from closed detention that will have the most powerful effect in mitigating mental illness.”
I cannot see her holding her job for much longer under the current government.
Out of sight and largely out of mind, Australia is building a generation of damaged people — almost all of whom, statistics and history show, are entitled to be granted refugee status under our international treaty obligations. In our deserts and on isolated islands, our government is building a legacy to haunt and shame us for generations. We must now consider our response in the light of Bonhoeffer’s declaration, for we too will be held accountable by history.
*Dr Michael Gliksman (@MGliksmanMDPhD) is a physician in private practice in Sydney. He is a member of the federal council of the AMA, a committee member of Doctors for Refugees and a member of the Australian Red Cross International Health Law Committee. The views expressed here are his own.
22 thoughts on “A generation of damaged people government wants to ignore”
Jonno Lee
December 16, 2013 at 6:08 pmIt is scary how the government is keeping the public in the dark and being non-transparent about information related to asylum seekers.
Just a few days ago at a press conference, Minister of Immigration and Border Protection, Scott Morrison failed to give a precise answer about the renewal of Salvation Army’s contract to provide humanitarian services to people on Manus and Nauru, however, Salvation Army has confirmed they will not be funded by the government.
The sudden axing of the Immigration Health Advisory Group to me appears to be another method of the government being secretive with the appalling treatment and inhuman conditions for human beings who have already been traumatised from past ordeals. This is not to mention the sky-rocketing costs of implementing Operation Sovereign Borders.
With the IHAG being axed, who will provide the independent voice and advocacy on behalf of asylum seekers to the government now?
Salamander
December 16, 2013 at 6:20 pmAustralia seems to be living in a fantasy /denial – sliding into acceptance of gulags/ concentration camps. We don’t even have the excuse of government tyranny – we are voting for these policies.
Hamis Hill
December 16, 2013 at 7:24 pmAre Australians really to blame when they are the victims of some very clever propaganda?
Propaganda designed to distract from the economic insecurity caused by massive personal debt and job insecurity?
With the result being an economic “consensus” that “Australia” cannot afford to be generous to refugees?
Well unless Australians learn to be more generous to each other then their meanness to refugees will rebound on them.
This is a morality test which the nation is failing.
A lack of generosity has repercussions at home as well as in offshore gulags.
Most of this has been delivered by “The Australian”, and all of it is “Un-Australian”.
Time to snap out of it people, a Recession is on the horizon, and it will take all the generosity we can muster to survive the collapse of the credit card economy.
Tamas Calderwood
December 16, 2013 at 7:42 pmDF – a few points in response:
– All these people should be treated humanely.
– Most of them, however, are economic migrants, not asylum seekers. This is why the vast majority throw their passports overboard and lie about who they are.
– They should not, therefore, come to Australia at all. As happens now, they should all be taken to offshore camps and sent back as quickly as possible.
Keep in mind, this problem was solved by the Howard government. Labor started the people smuggling business up again. Shutting it down will be difficult but in these early days, it looks like this government is succeeding.
shepherdmarilyn
December 16, 2013 at 9:36 pmTamas, it makes no difference to you that you are lying again does it?
There are thousands of economic migrants who come here each year, they are not asylum seekers.
And there is no people smuggling business, there are refugees paying for transport and that is a perfectly legal exercise.
Patriot
December 17, 2013 at 12:17 amBlow them out of the water!
Crew.Doug
December 17, 2013 at 9:42 am“And there is no people smuggling business…”
Oh really? The self described ‘people smugglers’ must be lying about their business.
“there are refugees paying for transport and that is a perfectly legal exercise.”
Maybe, but to legally come here (and many other countries) you also need travel documents and satisfy visa requirements.
Tamas Calderwood
December 17, 2013 at 2:23 pmI’m not lying Marilyn. I think you just find the truth of this matter very uncomfortable.
Rena Zurawel
December 17, 2013 at 6:47 pmTamas Calderwood
Too little knowledge may be more dangerous than no knowledge at all. Get some knowledge about the smugglers’ business. We usually do not punish the victim so to stop the predator. Lack of logic?
The best way to stop the influx of refugees (and punish one of the most profitable industries on the planet) – is to stop the wars.
If you lived in Iraq you would do exactly the same: try to get away and save your life.
Is this a crime?????
Andrew C
December 25, 2013 at 7:07 amIs it possible that we have fallen into the trap of focusing on an issue generated as a result of populist politics? We are spending a lot of time and money on an issue which is simply deferring our attention from the broader context of the debate.
By no means am I suggesting that the issues of asylum seekers is not worthy of a debate, because it most certainly is, however I am suggesting that there are a number of issues which are really threatening to Australia’s way of life, development and standard of living.
Well done, Rena Zurawel, for bringing this debate back to one of the key issues, and that is the generation of asylum seekers due to war. I am sure other countries are laughing at us about our clever politics, poor policy and economic stupidity when it comes to this matter as countries around the world open up their borders to floods of refugees.
Just another point,regarding ‘people smugglers’, because terms such as these along with ‘boat people’ and ‘illegal refugees’ have really been the fuel to this fire in the public debate. These types of terms,like them or not have been one of the reasons that the focus has been shifted away from more pressing issues. The demonization of these people has generated disdain greatly due to the Australian public reliance on our ‘sound bite’ culture.