Dec 5, 2013

Razer’s class warfare: a diary of dissent

Helen Razer tells you how to protest and dissent in the modern age -- without resorting to cheap anti-intellectualism and anti-privilege.

Helen Razer — Writer and broadcaster

Helen Razer

Writer and broadcaster

Popular thinker William F. Buckley once joked he would prefer to be governed by the first 200 names in the Boston phonebook than the Harvard faculty. A is for Anti-intellectualism; the colourful credo hung on the nursery walls of neo-liberalism. It is the view of formal reason as elite that gives us bunkum like Nick Cater’s The Lucky Culture with its "latte sippers", "champagne socialists" and other beverage typecasting long since lost its pop. It is this view of "book learning” as the work of statist monsters that informs the Right. Except, of course, that it really doesn’t and really hasn’t; not, at least, since influential neo-liberal economist F.A. Hayek urged in the middle of the 20th century for a "free society (that is) once more an intellectual adventure, a deed of courage". Hayek and his rival John Maynard Keynes didn’t agree on much, as illustrated by the rap anthem below, but they both knew that the ideas of intellectuals shaped the future.

Buckley, of course, knew this as well; the Yale alum and professed intellectual used more $20 words than Guy Rundle. The Right’s "anti-intellectualism" is a tactic and a fiction retold convincingly by windbags like Cater and Bolt. It is also a story, to our shame, now used quite sincerely by the Left. In recent weeks, our nation’s better feminists have taken up the essential work of protest against state legislation that will potentially restrict access to abortion services. In response to the "foetal personhood" changes in New South Wales and in Victoria, the still murky propositions by Geoff Shaw, we have seen protest on social media ...

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

22 thoughts on “Razer’s class warfare: a diary of dissent

  1. Hominoid

    I checked my privilege and found that it intersected with my struggles. They cancelled each other out, leaving me feeling quite ordinary. Damn you, Razer.

  2. Mr J

    Great piece. It’s reminded me of Jeremy Paxman’s interview of Christopher Hitchens where he asked, and I’m paraphrasing, “Do you still consider yourself a leftist”? Hitchen’s reply was Yes, but both Paxman and Hitchens settled on a better description dialectic.

  3. Carlene Colahan

    Great piece Helen; thought provoking, well researched, incisive and entertaining 5 stars

  4. kmart

    Well, I guess I’m not one of the latte-sipping intellectuals, cos I can’t work out what Helen Razor is actually saying here! Is she FOR the guy with the “what she said” poster, or against him ? If someone could summarise without the political-sociology jargon, for the benefit of us non-intellectuals, I would truly appreciate it.

  5. bluepoppy

    Australian politics is very tribal and many times, I think this can be extended to particular struggles and causes. Much of it comes down to groupthink which, while the cause may be just, can intefere with logical and rational thinking on a subject; and promote the tendency for knee jerk responses.

    Many times I have seen an author of an article bombarded by enthusiastic feminist responses, and which clearly demonstrate the person has not really read the article and/or misunderstood the message intended.

    PS: Have never understood the beveragisation of political thought. Can anyone explain it?

  6. Bob the builder

    Identity politics – so 1990s!

    I remember at uni back then everyone in the (tiny) engaged left positioning themselves by their oppression. There was a lot of ‘grandad was a coal miner’ type of stuff, although sleeping with people of the same gender was blue ribbon material too.

    And the people who had actually grown up properly poor were too modest (or grateful at their luck) to play the game. Here we were, tertiary educated people, empowered enough to peacefully protest in the face of consistently violent police and lying media, yet so much time was wasted on proving our powerlessness rather than just getting on with changing things!

    Depressingly, 20 years later (as usual) the lazy liberal-left has caught up.

    I’m out of touch with what the active left is doing and thinking, but I suspect (and hope) that they’ve moved well beyond this self-defeating rhetoric.

  7. Chris Hartwell

    bluepoppy – lattes and champagne are generally more expensive than, say, a short black or a beer (or they used to be – yay craft beer!) It’s intended to imply elitism and consequently an inability to empathise with the struggles the “common people” struggle with.

  8. Kez

    kmart, a posible explanation: by keeping his mouth shut, the guy is doing the cause a disservice; despite the y chromosomes he’s allowed to speak up for the xx opressed.
    Or it could be something else. I’m a flat white slurper. What would I know.

  9. Tom Jones

    Kmart, Let me explain. Ms Razer thinks that if a man agrees with women and lets them speak for themselves he is anti intellectual. Women who appreciate a man who listens probably sip latte or drink Chardonnay and the people with influence speak in riddles. Simple really except it is all wrapped in convoluted sentences with no consistency.

  10. Jonathan Maddox

    GOLD, Tom Jones. Gold.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details