Menu lock

Journalism

Dec 4, 2013

The war on whistleblowers — it’s come to Australia

The tactics of the Obama administration's war on whistleblowers and journalists have now been openly deployed in Australia. The Coalition government is on the attack.

Bernard Keane — Politics Editor

Bernard Keane

Politics Editor

To the extent that it hadn’t before, the war on whistleblowers and journalists that has been waged in the United States and the United Kingdom for the past several years has now been opened in Australia in the past 24 hours.

The Prime Minister’s attack yesterday on the ABC, Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull’s unusual direct intervention with the ABC managing director Mark Scott, the smear campaign directed at Scott and The Guardian by loyalist media and then the remarkable news that ASIO had raided a Canberra lawyer’s office to seize information relating to an action brought by Timor-Leste in the International Court of Justice, are all profoundly concerning and all very familiar.

The Timor-Leste matter is entirely separate from the the ongoing Snowden revelations. The information was seized by ASIO agents in a raid on the office of Bernard Collaery, who was ACT attorney-general in the Kaine Liberal government in the late 1980s, authorised by current Attorney-General George Brandis under a remarkably wide warrant. It reveals that the Australian Secret Intelligence Service used Australia’s aid program to Timor-Leste as a cover for bugging the East Timorese cabinet to advantage the Howard government in commercial negotiations. The whistleblower who revealed this particularly shabby and highly damaging operation was also detained.

That whistleblower, said to be a former senior ASIS official, has not approached the media but is instead providing evidence in the legal action brought by Timor-Leste. In a crude attempt to prevent the former official from giving evidence in The Hague, his passport has now been cancelled. This particular dirty laundry goes back nearly a decade: the current head of ASIO, David Irvine, headed ASIS when it undertook this commercial espionage for the Howard government in 2004.

We’ve seen such tactics before, time and again, almost to the point of ritual, from the Obama administration in response to leaks by national security whistleblowers and their reporting by journalists: distract from the information revealed by attacking media outlets and journalists, suggest they are harming national security and should be prosecuted, attempt to discredit the revelations and use whatever legal measures are possible to harass whistleblowers and journalists, including, if necessary, anti-terrorism legislation.

The behaviour of the Abbott government in relation to the Indonesian phone-tapping story perfectly fits this pattern. While admitting that the revelations were a genuine story, both Tony Abbott and Malcolm Turnbull have attacked the ABC, which partnered with The Guardian in breaking the story. In a remarkable statement yesterday, Abbott suggested the ABC had breached its own act by “advertising a left-wing British newspaper”. When Katharine Murphy of The Guardian asked him whether the ABC’s partnering with Fairfax or News Corp to break stories was also “advertising”, Abbott refused to answer.

“Here, we can’t even have a parliamentary inquiry into our out-of-control intelligence agencies.”

Abbott’s claim that the ABC had breached its act distracted not only from further revelations about the willingness of the Australian Signals Directorate (formerly the Defence Signals Directorate, or DSD) to hand Australians’ data over to the US National Security Agency, but also from Turnbull’s blatant interference in the operations of the ABC. Turnbull called ABC managing director Mark Scott to criticise him over the Indonesian story.

This was a major breach of convention by Turnbull. Previous ministers for communications have communicated with the ABC through the chairman of the ABC board, who is appointed by government, not sought to directly influence the editor-in-chief, who is not. If Turnbull’s call to Scott was a formal rebuke, it was utterly inappropriate and breaches the ABC’s independence; if his call was an informal Malcolm-Mark chat, then it reflects a failure on Turnbull’s part to understand his responsibilities. If the Communications Minister has a problem with the ABC’s editorial decisions, he can do what Richard Alston did with his ill-fated Iraq War complaints — use the ABC’s, and then ACMA’s, complaints mechanism and write to the chairman.

Abbott also sought to play down the latest revelation about DSD, that the NSA believed it was happy (unlike Canadian agencies) to hand over metadata on Australians, as merely relating to “billing data”. That suggests either that the Prime Minister is profoundly ignorant about the most basic facts about surveillance, or eager to distract from the revelations.

The government’s attack on the ABC complements the ongoing News Corporation campaign against the national broadcaster. News Corp outlets are playing the same role as the establishment media in the US that have attacked WikiLeaks, Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden and Glenn Greenwald over Manning and Snowden’s whistleblowing, smearing both journalists and whistleblowers and claiming the exposure of US crimes are a victory for terrorists.

Also joining the debate have been intelligence sources eager to dismiss the Snowden revelations, although less eager to put their names to their denials. Speaking to compliant journalists, such officials are happy to breach confidence or break the law to dismiss claims that reflect badly on them, but are never heard from when it comes to telling Australians about practices that are directly harmful to our interests, such as the NSA’s extensive surveillance of Australians.

And lest anyone think this is all somehow because the Coalition is now in power, not a single thing that has happened in recent days wouldn’t have happened under Labor, except that Stephen Conroy would have known better than to call Mark Scott and Labor might have been reluctant to attack The Guardian as “left-wing”. But Mark Dreyfus, shadow attorney-general, is still opposing any sort of inquiry into the behaviour of our foreign-focused intelligence agencies. This morning Labor combined with the Coalition to block a Greens motion to require the Attorney-General to explain the extraordinary ASIO and ASIS raids yesterday. And nearly three months after the election, the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security hasn’t even been re-appointed.

At least, in the US, such is the shock at the exposure of the NSA’s extensive and illegal surveillance that even the strongest national security advocates are calling for the agency to be reined in and for more oversight of its activities. Here, we can’t even have a parliamentary inquiry into our out-of-control intelligence agencies.

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

32 comments

Leave a comment

32 thoughts on “The war on whistleblowers — it’s come to Australia

  1. PDGFD1

    Thank you Bernard, abundantly clear.

  2. Yclept

    Abbott is an absolute disgrace and Turnbull is showing himself as not much better. How did these buffoons steal power????

  3. Daly

    They told lies and comtinue to lie about the lies.
    Bernard understands how government works and constantly educates his readers. News Ltd and particularly the LibNats work at confusing their readers so that it all seems chaotic, etc etc.
    Christopher Pyne’s email to followers explaining the latest education funding (last night, or has it been superseded?) was a master lessonminmthis sort of obfuscation. Every sentence was a lie but only if you understood how things work. If not it could be read as reasonable! Creative writing of fiction, immediately broadcast by compliant press tv and radio.
    Thanks again Bernard.

  4. leon knight

    Good on Crikey and the ABC for holding the spotlight on these shonky behaviours – we should not allow Stasi methods to sneak in by stealth.
    I can’t see how this latest move by Brandis will turn out well for the LNP.

  5. zut alors

    Spot on Bernard.

    Malcolm has forgotten his ministerial manners – what a disappointment he has proven to be.

  6. Bronwyn

    It would be a public service for Crikey to lift the paywall on this.

    Downer’s role as lobbyist for Woodside also rates mention.

    What an appalling episode.

  7. Sharkie

    Thank you Bernard. Spot on.
    And no doubt the hacks at New Limited and 2GB will start to beat the “national security” drum while dreaming up wacky conspiracy about the ABC and anyone else who questions the actions of Brandis and Abbott.
    The coincidence line (that the raids and passport confiscation have nothing to do with the trial in the hague) is farcical. This country desperately needs media people to call BS on Brandis and Abbott. Why the ALP has gone all meek on this matter is beyond me.

  8. klewso

    “Buggery in the National Interest”?

  9. klewso

    What we’ve lost in the name of someone else’s self-serving definition of “Fighting Terror”?

  10. klewso

    So “Howard Ink, wanted to screw Timor of it’s inheritance to benefit an oil company, paying taxes”? What’s wrong with that? It seems perfectly all Right to lots?

Leave a comment