Australian Federal Police access details of parliamentarians’ phone records in order to track down leakers, the AFP admitted to a Senate committee shortly before the election.

In a response to the Senate’s Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee provided just before the election was called, the AFP answered a question from South Australian Senator Nick Xenophon about whether MPs and senators were targeted by the AFP in leak investigations, saying:

“… for reasons of operational security the AFP does not disclose specific operational information to ensure integrity of its investigations, however the AFP can disclose there have been occasions where members of Parliament have been the subject to Authorisation Orders.”

The response followed questioning by Xenophon at budget estimates earlier this year in which the AFP readily stated it obtains telecommunications data of journalists as part of investigations into leaks under sections 70 and 79 of the Commonwealth Crimes Act. Over the last two years, the AFP was asked to conduct 10 leak investigations, pursued six of those and was considering pursuing a seventh, Xenophon was told. “We will know the numbers they [journalists] have called. Whether or not we have gone to the next step of making further requests under section 178 to find out who those numbers belong to is a matter for the investigations team on a case-by-case basis,” Deputy Commissioner Michael Phelan told the committee.

The push by federal and state law enforcement and security agencies for data retention is partly motivated by concerns that telecommunications companies no longer need to retain data such as called numbers for billing purposes, and thus are not bothering to store it. Data retained under the European Union’s data retention directive has been used by Polish authorities to track down whistleblowers.

Any journalist whose data has been obtained by the AFP won’t be aware of it, Commissioner Tony Negus told Xenophon. But he suggested journalists simply not use their phones to talk to whistleblowers and leakers. “[I]in my experience, most journalists are astute enough not use their own telephones when they are doing this sort of stuff.”

However, it appears that if whistleblowers prefer to take sensitive information to MPs or senators rather than the public forum of the media, they will be no safer. Political staffers have previously been targeted by AFP raids — most notably Fairfax reporter Philip Dorling when he advised Labor’s Laurie Brereton — but MPs and senators themselves have no protection from investigation by the AFP. Their phone records can be obtained as easily by police as those of anyone else — and they have been.

Get Crikey for $1 a week.

Lockdowns are over and BBQs are back! At last, we get to talk to people in real life. But conversation topics outside COVID are so thin on the ground.

Join Crikey and we’ll give you something to talk about. Get your first 12 weeks for $12 to get stories, analysis and BBQ stoppers you won’t see anywhere else.

Peter Fray
Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey
12 weeks for just $12.