The government’s carbon repeal bill will resurrect an old offence of “price exploitation” and give the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission new powers to investigate and impose fines on companies — a remarkable backflip by the Coalition on its stance in opposition.
As part of its campaign against the carbon price in 2011, the Coalition dramatically warned about carbon cops that were going to enforce the Gillard government’s draconian Clean Energy Acts and how Australian businesses would be “gagged” by the ACCC from telling customers they had to raise prices because of the carbon tax, under threat of fines of $1.1 million.
The tone of the Coalition’s attacks in 2011 bordered on hysterical. “The Gillard government’s plan to use the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission to gag small businesses from informing consumers of price increases due to the carbon tax is a further attack on the struggling sector,” then-opposition spokesman Bruce Billson lamented.
As Crikey explained at the time, the government had given itself no new powers under the Clean Energy Act to do anything — it merely said the ACCC would be given some extra funding and already had a power to crack down on false and misleading conduct by businesses under Australian Consumer Law.
Some even criticised this as inadequate at the time because for the introduction of the GST in 2000, the ACCC had a temporary additional power, provided by the GST legislation, relating to “price exploitation” — that is, charging an “unreasonably high price”, separate from engaging in false or misleading conduct about that price. But price exploitation wasn’t among the offences that had been codified at the start of 2011 when Labor overhauled the Trade Practices Act, which became the Competition and Consumer Act — supported by the Coalition.
So when the Coalition introduced the GST, it was happy to give the ACCC extra-tough powers to crack down on charging “unreasonably high prices”, but when Labor said the ACCC would be using existing powers to check on price rises relating to the carbon price, it was an attack on business.
Given Australia is now “open for business” and the government is committed to slashing red tape, presumably the Coalition’s repeal of the carbon price will include no gagging of businesses with threats of $1.1 million fines, no threats to use the “false and misleading conduct” sections of the Consumer Law, no carbon cops?
Well not quite.
Environment Minister Greg Hunt’s carbon price repeal bill, released yesterday as an exposure draft, repeats the Howard government’s approach and re-establishes within the Competition and Consumer Act the extra GST-era power to pursue price exploitation, under which not merely is it an offence to “make a false or misleading representation … concerning the effect of the carbon tax repeal” but it becomes an offence to “engage in price exploitation in relation to the carbon tax repeal” — which is selling gas, power or other identified goods for an “unreasonably high” price.
The ACCC is specifically empowered by the bill to monitor prices for the purposes of pursuing price exploitation, including forcing companies to provide information about their internal activities. It can also hand out infringement notices (i.e. the equivalent of speeding tickets) to companies for price exploitation, and if they’re not paid, take them to court to face fines of up to $1.7 million (that’s the current equivalent of the old $1.1 million fine, after Commonwealth penalty units went up this year) or just over $1.1 million for breaching the “false and misleading” sections.
The Gillard government’s mechanisms for checking false and misleading claims by business about the introduction of the carbon price pale in comparison with those proposed by the Abbott government for its repeal.
Business groups have previously warned the Coalition against aggressively vetting pricing after the carbon price is repealed. Peak bodies contacted by Crikey this morning said they were still considering the exposure draft.

11 thoughts on “The draconian new powers handed to the ACCC on carbon”
klewso
October 16, 2013 at 1:27 pm“Reverse with pike. Degree of difficulty : 0” …. this is Tony Abbott.
Honest Johnny
October 16, 2013 at 1:51 pmPeak bodies will rightly be extremely concerned at the Government setting their prices via the ACCC watchdog carbon cop. The market mechanisms that respond to the repeal of the carbon price will actually push the price (of electricity) UP. It is not surprising they are “still considering the exposure draft”.
drmick
October 16, 2013 at 1:51 pmWe will decide who pays a carbon tax and under which circumstances they will pay the tax. Credibility overboard
CML
October 16, 2013 at 2:52 pmWhat was that about ‘competent, grown-up’ government we have had shoved down our throats for the last three or four years?
This government is a JOKE!! Couldn’t boil water without a recipe!!!
drmick
October 16, 2013 at 4:22 pmWorst prime monster and worst government ever.
Hamis Hill
October 16, 2013 at 5:19 pm“Peak bodies contacted this morning were still considering their exposure to charges of complete idiocy for supporting the recent change of government.”, more likely.
Honest Johnny
October 16, 2013 at 5:34 pmYes Hamis. As will small businesses across Australia who supported the change when they see their small business tax concessions (eg $6,500 instant asset write-off) taken away.
Mike Flanagan
October 16, 2013 at 7:50 pmdrmick;
You obviously don’t remember Billy Legs McMahon. Mind you, this bloke has had only had a few weeks, I suppose it is fair to suggest we should allow him a 100 day honeymoon, although the Morgan Poll indicates the population seem to be looking for an early separation agreement.
drmick
October 16, 2013 at 8:00 pmM Flanagan;I remember all the way back to Menzies & this bloke has shown consistently that he has learned nothing, knows nothing and is incapable of independent credible thought processes; and he is running the show! Never thought I would be asylum seeker but this asylum is being run by a lunatic.
a.mark.extra
October 16, 2013 at 9:20 pmOne of the features of the carbon price is collecting the tax at industrial sized emitters and the costs being passed-through the economy.
Given this, and that the repeal legislation might be retrospective how does the ACCC enforce price exploitation retrospectively?
On 1 July 2014, does the gas company charge manufacturers the carbon price and get asked to explain when the legislation comes into effect? or do they not charge and hope the legislation goes through unamended?
Do the manufacturers charge their customers?
Does everyone pay everyone back? or does everyone get to keep the money they collected to pay the tax that’s gone?
I don’t understand how it works. I don’t want to be nit-picky, I know it’s not really supposed to work and nobody expects it to, but I’d feel risky if I were a business and they don’t like that.