Advertising

Oct 8, 2013

Essential: voters hostile to US surveillance

We're growing more sceptical of the data collection by social media platforms and the surveillance activities of foreign governments, polling from Essential finds.

Bernard Keane — Politics editor

Bernard Keane

Politics editor

Australians strongly oppose the United States government's mass surveillance programs and more of us see the US government as a bigger internet threat than China, new polling from Essential Research reveals. Some 45% of Australians oppose the US government's secret internet and telephone surveillance programs revealed by Edward Snowden, compared to 24% who support them. That includes 25% of voters who "strongly oppose" the surveillance. And 45% of people reject the justification for such surveillance -- that it is necessary for national security and the fight against terrorism -- compared to 42% who agree with it. Coalition voters are more likely to support surveillance and its rationale than Labor and Greens voters. Social media companies fare worst in terms of privacy protection, with 57% of Australians saying they have no trust in Facebook to protect their privacy, and 55% saying they have no trust in Twitter; older voters tended to have even less trust in social media than younger voters. Around 43% of Australians say they have no trust in the US government to protect their privacy, more even than Google, which has been found to have been complicit in the National Security Agency's internet surveillance programs. Half of Australians, however, have some or a lot of trust in their internet service provide to protect their privacy -- more than their trust in the Australian government.

There is very strong support for requiring companies that provide services to Australians to tell them what information they have provided to foreign governments -- 73% to 16% opposition -- including 39% who strongly agree with such a requirement. That requirement was mooted during the election campaign by the Greens' Scott Ludlam, who called for a requirement that companies providing carriage or carriage service providers publicly reveal what agreements they have to provide information to foreign governments.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions

0 comments

Leave a comment

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...