“You want the real thing, the hard stuff,” a spruiker in Tokyo once asked of me. We were speaking of course of kabuki theatre, a lite version of which does a roaring trade among Japanese tourists. Forty-five minutes in which a nobleman kills a man who has dishonoured his daughter in the hope of winning back her regard, only to find out it was his son-in-law, whom she had secretly married.
Slow and predictable for Western tastes, but a video clip by Eastern ones. Real kabuki takes three hours to tell half that tale, and includes whole 45-minute sections of two men crossing a mountain road. Nothing that happens in kabuki should be surprising, so that the audience can admire how it is done, the endless microvariation.
Which long crossing of a mountain road leads us to the Abbott government in its third week. Tony Abbott had announced that this would be a government of “no surprises”, and in that he is correct — none of us are surprised at the surprises, enacted kabuki style, we are simply admiring the new methods employed to convey them.
Thus, after a few days of stuff for which Abbott had an executive mandate — scrapping the Climate Commission, sacking the National Broadband Network board — we got down to the real kabuki: Immigration Minister Scott Morrison announcing that the most basic release of information on boat arrivals amounted to “operational” intelligence, which would be grouped into a weekly bulletin. I must say I can’t find much outrage in me about that. It seems typical of Labor, in its residual attachment to some due process, that it would send out a press release EVERY TIME a boat was intercepted, each of which may as well have been headed “please smack me”. But the 45-minute kabuki in which Morrison-san mimed — dodging starwheels from the journos as they questioned him about what “operational” meant, and who decided what was a newsworthy, maritime event — was amusing to watch.
However, the kabuki served to hide the real dark matter: that we might never know the truth of boat turnarounds. It seems entirely possible that the navy could turn around a boat they wrongly assess as seaworthy, only to have it sink half an hour later, and we will never know about it. We may never know, through official sources, if the 48-hour turnaround, by plane, from Christmas Island is resulting in illness or death for ill, dehydrated people scooped off sinking vessels. And so on.
The second kabuki has been a double act between Joe Hockey and Mathias Cormann over the Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook, a process drawing in the strong dollar, Labor’s non-financing of programs (some of which is true), and sundry other matters discussed by m’colleague Bernard Keane. The Hockey-Cormann scene — a sort of father-son mourning act beside a scared stream that has ceased to flow — is into its second week, with no sign that we are even at interval.
“Capping places is what matters. It gets closer to the heartland of policy where the Coalition conceded ground to Labor in order to win …”
But a lot of that can be got away with. Many people won’t care that they won’t be told about the boats and that the complaint press — despite some kabukiesque expression of mild concern by the likes of the Bolter et al — won’t make any fuss about it, and so many will believe the problem to be solved. That’s even if the boats increase in number, as Indonesia winds back full co-operation, miffed at our colonialist incursions on their sovereignty. Ditto with climate, and even with the NBN, which for all Labor’s spruiking as a grand progressive project passes way over the heads of people not habitually involved with online work. All can be got away with kabuki-style.
And then yesterday, we got the first announcement that Labor might be able to gain some real traction over, with Education Minister Christopher Pyne’s announcement that the Abbott government may once again cap university places, a reversal of the demand-driven creation of tertiary places which is essential to tackling unequal access to higher ed. Capping would simply further shift the ratio of private to state students in favour of the latter. Pyne explicitly ruled out a return to capping in August last year, in writing.
There was a bit of kabuki surrounding it — the expected attack on any form of amenities fee, as some sort of pseudo-student-union charge — and a ritual dance with “red tape” and cutting it. And of course libertarians such as Andrew Norton working for the publicly funded Grattan Institute — your taxes at work — will focus on the student union stuff. But so what? Labor will just reverse it, once in power. Student unionism is a political fetish object, the silk handkerchief that any kabuki master can turn into a whole evening’s “entertainment”.
Capping places is what matters. It gets closer to the heartland of policy where the Coalition conceded ground to Labor in order to win — that the country will be a social market/social democratic system, oriented towards addressing inequality — and undermines it. Tertiary education is still a little distant from that, as most people’s kids aren’t going to go to uni, per se. But about a third to half will or will want to, and the chance for such really, really matters to a lot of people.
Pyne’s announcement then marks the first real breach of the “Abbott compact”; the explicit and implicit deal he made with the Australian people to get elected. The deal was that they would chuck out Labor, if Abbott promised to leave their core social programs — and the progressive impetus behind them — in place.
This announcement breaks that compact, utterly. It’s a gift for Labor, and they should focus on it to the exclusion of all else for a while — because everything else Abbott is doing, he pretty much said he’d do. Flannery will run the climate resistance, Change.org has started a grassroots campaign around the NBN — from day one, the Abbott government is facing a broader social resistance than the Howard government knew, because of the changed media and social environment.
Labor should leave that to them, and go for uni places, uni places, uni places. Broken promises, and a broken compact. Forget the kabuki, and go straight for the flinging raw meat, the political bhuttoh, the hard stuff.

10 thoughts on “Forget the kabuki act and nail Abbott on universities”
Andrew Norton
September 26, 2013 at 2:23 pmI did focus on the uncapping issue in op-eds for the SMH and the Conversation, and in several media interviews reported yesterday and today. Unsurprising, given that I have spent the last 15 years promoting this policy, and released a report on the demand-driven system last month.
I only wrote on VSU for Crikey because they asked me to write an article, and I did not want to write three opinion articles on the same subject on the same day. I agree that it is a relatively minor issue, and my Crikey piece proposed a way of making it go away forever.
BTW while Grattan has a taxpayer-funded endowment, my program is financed by the Myer Foundation.
paddy
September 26, 2013 at 2:41 pmGot to disagree with you on this one Guy.
The NBN is way more important than the university issue.
It’s (potentially) the single greatest achievement of 6 years of Labor Govt.
Plus there’s a *real* chance they can hold Turnbull & Abbott’s feet to the fire and keep it on track.
Turnbull knows he’s selling a dog with his FTTN.
But it’s actually not up to him. Abbott & his backers need to be violently smacked in the face with a wet, digital fish. So the pain from outraged punters and an opposition that might even include the Senate crazies, is worse than Rupert’s “whispers”.
Djbekka
September 26, 2013 at 5:36 pmI agree with Guy, go hard on the University issue and broken promises. We knew that the NBN would be a battle. If I were an advisor, I would go for regional and country seats on the NBN – after all, city seats have the TV cables and so a chance at reasonable service.
(Hey Andrew, I read the SMH piece – thanks.)
Malcolm Street
September 26, 2013 at 6:36 pmDjbekka – agree that the NBN is a potential winner in the bush. I noted in an interview a while ago Cathy McGowan (winner in Indi) mentioned broadband as one of her priorities. Wait ’till the bush finds out that they’ve been sold down the river by the Nationals (yet again) and face being stuck with second-hand access to the basic communications infrastructure of the 21st century.
Gavin Moodie
September 26, 2013 at 7:56 pmThe difficulty with this advice is that upon assuming the portfolio in the second Rudd ministry education minister Kim Carr floated reimposing caps on university places, for the same elitist reasons that Pyne proposes reimposing caps.
AR
September 26, 2013 at 9:46 pm“..a scared stream” & “complaint press“? Both possible given your often pyrotechnic phraseology but, really?
Karen
September 26, 2013 at 11:00 pmAgree Guy – Labor has to focus on the crude blunt dismantling of core social programs, starting with education, followed by the dismantling of the industrial system which will surely follow. I also think that Labor needs to strategically focus its communication strategies on carbon pricing, NBN, mining taxes, although it can leave the heavy lifting for others to fight the rear guard action, at least until Labor starts to gain traction on the other issues.
I have never, ever understood why the punters keep thinking and trusting that somehow the Libs are not going to be as bad as they really are when they get into office. That they see the Libs as somehow far more benign than they really are. No, the Libs have only been about promoting really wealthy sectional interests, at the expense of everybody else. Fascism, by another name. Nothing more, nothing less.
The frustrating thing is that by the time the punter gets around to voting them out, a lot of damage gets done, through brutal neglect and vicious policy making. Labor comes in and behaves like a bunch of maniacs trying to restore those core social programs (eg look at Julia go like the clappers and what she achieved in less than 3 years).
Then, of course, the punters can’t cope with the speed of change or, maybe more to the point at least in recent times, being bashed around the head with all the negative press Labor gets, courtesy of vested interests and the MSM machine (mostly Murdoch in this country) who wants business as usual. The bullied punter sets about voting Labor out again (if nothing else but to get a bit of respite from the MSM) and the cycle begins again.
And of course it doesn’t help when you have a Rudd, a once in a century egomaniac, undermining every Labor leader that ever came before him and after him to the press. Hopefully, by now he realises he’s been used as a useful idiot by the MSM to promote the interests of (hey its not about you Kevin) but the goddamn Liberal Party.
Mr Tank
September 27, 2013 at 11:43 amHa! The trouble with devising an oppositional attack strategy against this lot is that there are so many targets to go for. Methinks, however, that you are on the right track with the broken promise angle – it is after all the issue that turned folks against labor (Julia’s never ever carbon tax and Anna Bligh’s no change to the fuel subsidy or sale of state owned enterprises). I think there is now zero tolerance for such behaviour in the broader community and an attendant long memory (with base ball bat – sorry – cricket bat awaiting the transgressors at the next poll. I suspect that the current Labor leadership contenders could make great hay with this – using the media attention of the leadership contest to drive the message home whilst reinforcing the impression that Labor has changed. New brooms etc. Too right on the NBN in the bush angle too!
Mike Flanagan
September 27, 2013 at 12:28 pmThanks Karen for your foregoing insightful, and hopefully inciteful, comments.
The early appearances of a government manned by personnel that have little or no knowledge or preparation for government is being evidenced by their demand to work behind a wall of secrecy.
Natalewaga, FM Indonesia, has found their measure early when he refuses FM Bishop the luxury of lying about her contacts and conversations, by the early releasing of his interpretations of their contacts and conversations.
Marty Natalewaga is a consummate diplomat who has served his countries interests for many years and appears to have Ms Bishop’s measure particularly in relation to the veracity as what actually transpired, hence the early and unique release of his version of the transcripts of the contact in his own language, Bahasa.
Abbott’s sole political strategy, built on his all-consuming characteristic of bludgeoning and bullying tactics, will not suffice when he deals with SBY with Marty Natalewaga and the Foreign Affairs parliamentary committee at his side.
The early indications of how shallow, inexperienced and bereft of any preparation shown so far by Abbott and co, only serves to re-inforce the perception that this man IS not only intellectually challenged but ill prepared for the office Murdoch and the MSM have assigned him on our behalf.
John Miller
September 27, 2013 at 5:42 pmAbsolutely couldn’t agree more. The Abbott compact will be seen to be a sham in the coming months…pity Labor don’t yet have a leader to unite behind!