Media

Sep 16, 2013

Media briefs: Wharfie review … Age literals … Ten’s eye …

The Brisbane Times has recruited ordinary punters to review the Brisbane Festival. Professional reviewers aren't happy. That and other media tidbits.

Fairfax pushes the boat out on arts reviewing. Fairfax’s Brisbane Times website has taken an innovative approach to covering the Brisbane Festival by recruiting a lawyer, advertising sales manager and a wharf yard worker to review the festival's shows. The idea behind the "street reviewer team" is clear: to allow regular Brisbanites to have a say as well as the artistic cognoscenti. It’s also cheaper, no doubt, than commissioning professionals to do the job. The decision to outsource reviewing to the great unwashed has unsurprisingly caused some consternation among professional critics -- especially because productions are using the reviews to spruik their shows. Wynnum wharf yard worker James Niland, for example, was a big fan of La Boite's production of The Wizard of Oz. But is it misleading for La Boite to present his verdict as The Brisbane Times' in its marketing spiel? 

Hamish leaves Ten. More bad news for incoming Channel Ten news boss Peter Meakin, whose lawyers are duelling with Channel Seven about whether the grizzled veteran has to sit on the sidelines for six or 12 months. Ten's globe-trotting heartthrob Hamish MacDonald, billed as Australia's answer to CNN star Anderson Cooper, is leaving the network. MacDonald, who famously wore red pants while presenting the late news, announced the move on Twitter today:

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions

1 comments

Leave a comment

One thought on “Media briefs: Wharfie review … Age literals … Ten’s eye …

  1. Bob the builder

    I wonder how NT Labor underspent in remote Aboriginal areas ‘for decades’ given they only spent one decade in power! There was decades of underspending, but not by Labor – because they were never in power.
    What sloppy journalism!

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...