Jul 29, 2013

Road test: are the young or the elderly more dangerous?

Young drivers are often portrayed in the media as drink-driving or hooning, but do older drivers actually cause more accidents? Freelance journalist Ben Westcott wonders who you really want behind the wheel.

Car crash

Young drivers regularly make the front pages of our newspapers, too often in tragic circumstances. From drag racing to drink-driving, they’re portrayed as being a menace on the road. The UK’s Telegraph wrote, sensationally, that “Young drivers have a licence to kill“.

But for all the emphasis on young hooning P-platers, another age group is causing more than its fair share of road accidents.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

12 thoughts on “Road test: are the young or the elderly more dangerous?

  1. er etgb

    Defensive driving courses in schools would be a start. Better to help them understand and minimise risk. The driving tests are rubbish. Learning to reverse park as a priority won’t save your life.

  2. Mick McWilliams

    Exactly. There is no car control, swerve and recover or panic stop skills in our licensiing system. The rest of the developed world must view driving in Australia, like we view driving in the Phillipines.

  3. zut alors

    At least accidents caused by the 90-100 age group aren’t a result of mindless texting while at the wheel.

  4. mikeb

    I reckon labelling it as “young people” is also a bit misleading as I’ll wager it is “young” men who are creating most of the risk. Defensive driving courses are all good but until the reckless stupidity part of the brain grows out then the same potential car crash drivers will continue to be a risk. The best defensive driving course I had was riding a motorbike before owning a car.

  5. Jim McCarthy

    The standard of ‘driving’ in Aust, by all demographics is disgusting.

    There needs to be a national standard driving course, involving at least two practical components to obtain ‘L’ and ‘P’ licenses. Just like motorcyclists are required to do.
    Instead we are being dumbed down with gadgets that will park for you, turn your lights on, warn you that you’re about to merge into someone.

    Dumbed down to believe that you’re safe in your steel cocoon. Don’t worry about the person you hit, as long as you’re safe.

  6. Rosemary Stanton

    Could we please have a better definition of elderly. There’s a lot of difference between those who are 60 and those who are 90 and yet some people classify them all as ‘elderly’.

  7. peterh_oz

    Old people take a wrong turn, then get rescued by those “irresponsible” young people while the car takes out a peak hour train!

    But no, let’s make that a “cute” story about the old duffer who has decided its best not to drive at night *giggle*hug*roll-credits.

  8. Persia

    What do you mean “or”? Young AND old, many drivers are selfish, reckless, lacking in skill and awareness, scary to share the road with.

  9. TheFamousEccles

    I agree with Mikeb – riding a motorcycle makes you hyper-aware of almost everything moving or otherwise. It is a given with any motorcyclist to assume that anyone in a “cage” is homicidal and wants to kill you.

    Riding a motorcycle has informed my car driving habits – simple things like actually moving your head to check your blind spots! Its astounding how few people do this.

  10. fractious

    “Young AND old, many drivers are selfish, reckless, lacking in skill and awareness, scary to share the road with.”

    Spot on.

    Eccles: the skills I’ve learnt in becoming an aware bike rider over the decades have certainly made me a better car driver. Many years back I also drove trucks, and I have recently gone back to driving to earn a crust. I am not for a minute suggesting all riders and all professional (truck and bus) drivers are the zenith of awareness, skill and courtesy, but many of the stunts the average car driver routinely performs right in front of a large goods vehicle have to be seen to be believed. And it occurs to me that if these so-called drivers can’t see (or can’t be bothered to look) a rather large truck, what odds they will ever see or care about anything smaller? Unfortunately, many – perhaps most – people seem to view the license to drive a car as a right, and not a privilege. That attitude isencouraged by governments, who would much rather rake in the money from fines than spend a single dollar on improving training or (heavens forfend) making the driving test worthy of its name.

    The OP states:

    Professor Raphael Grzebieta from the Transport and Road Safety unit at University of New South Wales said since some young people won’t check their behaviour, it’s up to the media

    Drivel. It is not up to the media to check any driver’s behaviour, young, old or in between. It’s up to the drivers themselves to watch what they’re doing. Being able and willing to monitor oneself and not be a selfish ar$ehole on the road is a conscious decision. Along with your peers, those who train and test drivers have a significant role, as do (or at least should) governments – it’s well past time governments dropped the notion that fines and demerit points are the only means of reducing crashes and injuries. Not that they will, the money they rake in is just too addictive.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details