Jul 19, 2013

A tale of two Murdochs: Rupert responds to leaked tapes

Rupert Murdoch says he chose the "wrong adjectives" in a leaked recording of a meeting with Sun journalists over ongoing legal challenges. It's his first response to the latest scandal.

Matthew Knott

Former Crikey media reporter

Rupert Murdoch

News Corp chairman Rupert Murdoch has denied knowing before 2011 that his UK journalists were paying police officers for information, despite telling journalists at The Sun the practice had existed on Fleet Street for "a hundred years". Two letters written by Murdoch -- but no doubt heavily legalled -- were released overnight, and represent his first detailed response to a leaked recording of a meeting with Sun journalists. Murdoch is facing a fresh UK police investigation over the tapes and they may have implications in the United States, where the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act makes it illegal for a company to bribe officials. He has also retracted claims that the British police investigation into wrongdoing at his newspapers had been "totally incompetent" and was over "next to nothing". In his leaked meeting at The Sun, first published on the ExaroNews website, Murdoch said:
"We're talking about payments for news tips from cops. That's been going on a hundred years, absolutely. You didn't instigate it ... Now there was a law passed against this in 1906. That's when it was first recognised as a problem ... I think it's just outrageous, but -- and I don't know of anybody, or anything, that did anything that wasn't being done across Fleet Street and wasn't the culture."
Murdoch also described his direct experience of seeing a wall safe in the office of the News of the World CEO containing emergency funds for payments to powerful friends. Murdoch says reports interpreting these comments to mean he was aware of payments to police officers -- illegal under UK law -- are "completely false". He writes in the letter to John Whittingdale, chair of the Commons media and culture house committee:
"When I first heard there was evidence of inappropriate payments in Spring 2011, I agreed with the decision to seek counsel and then report this information to MPs, which led to Operation Elveden."

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

15 thoughts on “A tale of two Murdochs: Rupert responds to leaked tapes

  1. john willoughby

    Good luck getting Rupert to come back to Britain.. He might finish up holed up with a real journalist in an Embassy..

  2. drmick

    The sun dog looks prune fleshed and pathetic when grovelling in front of a parliamentary committee but grows horns a tail and 3 metre nose when he thinks no one is listening. This is the creature who will be running autralia after the next election. He owns both leaders

  3. Andybob

    I was kind of hoping that the expression of gratitude for the great mans letter was because the failure to adequately explain away his honest comments to his employees meant an inevitable finding that he was not a fit and proper person, but I suppose that would be too much to ask for.

  4. DiddyWrote

    We’re talking about payments for news tips from cops. That’s been going on a hundred years, absolutely. You didn’t instigate it

    GOTCHA! There is absolutely no ambiguity in that statement. Murdoch knew and condoned this illegal behaviour before, during and after it all came out. The Feds in the US should be taking this as proof positive that the Chairman of News allowed the bribery of foreign officials.
    Sadly, I suspect nothing will happen as the political will to nail the evil old bastard just isn’t there.

  5. zut alors

    At least Murdoch’s allegedly deeply cared for employees are now guaranteed he won’t be making any more shallow in-house speeches.

  6. whoknows

    Murdoch takes comfort in resting his hand on any number of dirt boxes containing politicians, people of influence & police, detailing enough information to destroy them, whoever may want to challenge him.

    He just reaches for it and they reconsider. He smiles and continues his empty existence.
    More humble in public, more evil in practice.

  7. klewso

    Only when he discovered it was a whine press he was sitting on – that leaked like it did – did he decide to “co-operate”.

  8. klewso

    Who compromised and manoeuvred the cops into that corner more than him and his ministrations?

  9. Andrew McIntosh

    He’s not going to learn – ever – a thing about basic human ethics, let alone journalistic, legal and others. He is completely about expediency and ruthless pragmatism in the service of control and domination and nothing else. In short, he does not care.

    And what about the part of the leaked recording when, in response to someone asking when “we hit back”, he replies “we will”? Is that threat going to left hanging in the air?

    This is going to sound callous, but at this stage I don’t care either – the sooner he drops dead the better. There is nothing admirable or redeemable about the man.

  10. drmick

    Klewso; he has everyone by the short and curlies. If the yanks dont shut him down no one else will be able to touch him. sort of like a teflon turd.We might get the government we deserve but i doubt it when he has anything to do with it.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details