Menu lock

Australia

Apr 17, 2013

One Nation claims against ‘vengeful and political’ Abbott acts

Fifteen years after it began, Tony Abbott's secret pact to destroy One Nation will be examined in open court. Crikey has obtained the statement of claim by One Nation co-founder David Ettridge.

One Nation co-founder David Ettridge’s bombshell $1.5 million legal action against Opposition Leader Tony Abbott is looming as unwanted distraction as the prime minister-in-waiting presses home his electoral advantage against the Gillard government.

Ettridge, alongside former Abbott staffer David Oldfield, was the other half of the “two Davids” that set up One Nation in 1997 as a vehicle for Pauline Hanson’s dubious political ambitions.

But Abbott had his own fightback forum — Australians for Honest Politics — convened soon after to destroy Hanson and her party through legal action focused on its dubious Australian Electoral Commission registration. The $100,000 fund aimed to protect the Coalition’s vote at the 1998 federal election from a devastating right-flank assault.

Ettrdige is claiming damages relating to lost employment, legal fees, loss of freedom and the forced sale of his house, accusing Abbott of unlawfully assisting civil action for which he was ultimately found not guilty.

The question that’s always hung over Abbott — outlined by former Sydney Morning Herald webdiarist Margo Kingston almost a decade ago — is that he avoided disclosing donors to Australians for Honest Politics to the AEC and fibbed about a pledge to cover lay civil litigant (and disaffected One Nation member) Terry Sharples’ legal fees. Kingston wrote the apparent deception had ended any dreams Abbott ever had of becoming prime minister.

This helpful timeline sketched out by Kingston in her 2007 book Still Not Happy, John and republished on New Matilda in December remains the best top-down primer.

The second defendents are listed as “known contributors” to the slush fund and include former Liberal MP and trustee Peter Coleman, Packer lieutenant and Graham Richardson associate Trevor Kennedy and mining rich-lister, Lavoisier Group chairman and Institute of Public Affairs board member Harold Clough.

On morning radio today, Abbott dismissed the suit as “just a bit of payback” over the tumultuous wheeling and dealing of the late 1990s as Hanson fever took the country by storm. “It was a campaign that I was very much a part of all those years ago, and I guess some of the former One Nation types have never really forgiven me for it,” he said, admitting he had tried to expose the “dodgy” nature of the party.

In the full statement of claim obtained by Crikey Ettridge alleges:

“[My] character was under assault on a number of fronts as a result of the defendant’s actions during a heightened period of media and political prejudice against the One Nation Party … Such a breach of the law is made especially more unacceptable when the person doing it is a Member of Parliament and a legislator who acts with no respect for the very law he has sworn as a Member of Parliament to uphold. The 1st defendant acted above the law…

“Abbott’s motivation was vengeful and political and he wanted to destroy the lawfully registered Pauline Hanson’s One Nation party in order that the Liberal Party to which he belonged, would not lose votes and consequent electoral funding at the October 1998 Federal election to the new One Nation Party.”

Ettridge and Hanson were sentenced to three years jail in 2003 after a court found the duo guilty of fraud over the status of the 500 members listed on One Nation’s registration form. But the sentence was overturned on appeal later that year and they were immediately released.

In the statement of claim, Ettridge maintains his “complete innocence” over all the charges ever levelled against him.

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

24 comments

Leave a comment

24 thoughts on “One Nation claims against ‘vengeful and political’ Abbott acts

  1. mikehilliard

    It’s one thing to go abut tearing down a political party with lies & half truths, that’s exactly what Abbott’s doing now. It’s another thing altogether to be a minister involved in the litigation and jailing of innocent people (no matter who they are).

    Always comforting to know that 15 years on we still have the same old Abbott.

  2. The Pav

    If succesful would the damages claim bankrupt Abbott?

    Even the legal fees could cause this since he so recently said he was doing it tough financially.

    If he receives funding for his legal fees by donations will this have to be declared?

  3. Saugoof

    it’s the sort of lawsuit where you wish both parties would lose…

    That said, I’m sure Abbott is right that there is an element of payback in there, but I also have little doubt that there was a lot on both sides that wasn’t exactly ethical, to put it mildly. If there’s one good thing coming out of this law suit, it’s that there’s a chance that what happened behind the scenes at the times may end up getting revealed now.

  4. John Bennetts

    Not “now”, Saugoof.

    Later.

    If the case proceeds, there’s Buckley’s chance of the details coming out before Sept 12, let alone now.

  5. Mark from Melbourne

    I’m with Saugoof, a pox on both their houses. Politics can be a dirty business – doesn’t need to be but often is. And it’s not just the current crop – if you read your history it has always been thus. Was very interested to hear about what the loss of some of Menzies cabinet in that plane crash triggered all those years ago – fascinating stuff. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1940_Canberra_air_disaster

  6. Kevin

    Please do not refer to Abbott as “the prime minister-in-waiting”…. We do have a democratic system of voting that decides these thing…… It called an election……

  7. zut alors

    I agree with John Bennetts.

    The last I heard Ramjan vs Kroger and The Oz is being delayed until next year. Hence, no light will be shone on Abbott’s behaviour from that quarter prior to the election. Ditto with the Ettridge lawsuit.

    Lady Luck seems to be favouring Abbott at the moment – but she has a habit of being unpredictable and turning.

  8. Achmed

    I’m sure Abbotts legal team will ensure the proceedings do not take place before the election and they will apply for a “gag” on proceedings

  9. shepherdmarilyn

    It seems to me the only dodgy person here was and is Abbott.

  10. dazza

    Australians for honest politics.. And Abbot?? That just doesn’t sound right!