Australia

Apr 3, 2013

Yes, Rupert, racism is disgraceful — tell your newspapers

Rupert Murdoch has attacked Labor for being racist and portrayed himself as an immigration advocate. Does that ring true, given the stories his newspapers run? Crikey intern Ben Westcott trawls through the archives.

Yesterday News Limited chairman Rupert Murdoch, who is visiting Australia, took aim at Labor for being racist while portraying himself as a champion of immigration. "I think the way they're talking about the 457 [visas] is disgraceful and racist. I'm a big one for encouraging immigration, I think that's the future," Murdoch told Sky News from Darwin in relation to the Gillard government's criticism of 457 visas. We thought we'd trawl the archives for stories from Murdoch's News Ltd publications over the last three years, relating to immigration and race issues. Judge for yourself whether Murdoch's anti-racism crusade rings true ... In May 2012, The Daily Telegraph ran this piece:

The Daily Telegraph, 22 May 2012

The poll beside the article said 67% of readers thought immigration should be completely banned. The paper followed up in October 2012 with a piece describing the diseases that asylum seekers carry:

The Daily Telegraph, 12 October 2012

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions

22 comments

Leave a comment

22 thoughts on “Yes, Rupert, racism is disgraceful — tell your newspapers

  1. Achmed

    I am still bewildered how anyone can claim that a review of the use of 457 visas to ensure the system is not being rorted by employers and that the employers are employing qualified Aussies and employing 457 Visa workers for what is intended is in anyway racist.
    A desperate attempt by using the “race” card to stifle debate and protect the employers who are misusing/rorting the 457 visa system

  2. klewso

    So you’re asking “Is what Rupert says for public consumption (and appearances), and what Rupert does are the same thing?”?

  3. klewso

    So what line does Murdoch push in public re “Climate Change”, and what barrow does his press push?

  4. Matthew of Canberra

    Just breathtaking.

    There must have, surely, been a discussion on the plane with a media adviser which went something like

    “Rupert, there’s just no way you’re going to get away with that – you’ll be laughed out of town”

    “Just watch me”

  5. shepherdmarilyn

    Achmed, it is racist because Gillard was talking about the workers who are largely brown when she should have been talking about the employers who do the rorting.

  6. Matthew of Canberra

    “is in anyway racist.”

    Even if it was an outright crack-down, it’s still a stretch to claim it’s anything to do with “racism”. It’s protectionist, sure. But I don’t see where anyone (at least in the ALP) is expressing a view on what “sort” of people get should approvals.

  7. MJPC

    Rupert is towing the political line in his newspapers, for the consumption of the great unwashed. For his big end of town buddies he is all for immigration, the less educated the better as they are the slaves of the future in an Australia which the LNP will seek to create a working poor.
    At any rate why is the government taking any notice of Rupert, is is an american.

  8. Microseris

    Given the content of his papers, the only reasonable explanation is dementia.

  9. Jeff Allen

    What? Rupert an Australian? I thought he left for (tax) pastures greener (until his mate Little Johnny ammended the capital gains tax legislation so he could buy and sell media operations in Australia without troubling himself with triffling taxes…)
    What right does he have to come over here and say ANYTHING let alone be critical? Just becasue he decides who will run the country, doesn’t give him the right to criticise it!

  10. Andybob

    Ben I trust you had your tongue firmly in your cheek with the closing question to your article. Rupert’s editors have nightmares about falling out of step with the great man, but this latest thought bubble for public consumption will not result in a change of coverage at all.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...