Feb 22, 2013

Football faithful hit back at evidence-free drugs probe

Essendon fans are angry at their treatment by the Australian Crime Commission and the investigation into drugs and administration. And the media is also in fans' sights.

Andrew Crook — Former <em>Crikey</em> Senior Journalist

Andrew Crook

Former Crikey Senior Journalist

Could the Australian Crime Commission's infamous report into drugs in Australian sport -- which lacks specific evidence -- be on the verge of collapse? Just two weeks after the famous six-headed press conference featuring the chiefs of Australia's leading sporting bodies and two Gillard government ministers, the car crash allegations contained in the ACC tome have taken on a whiff of unreality. Football fans distraught at the public shaming of their teams are complaining that the mud thrown their way by the ACC has failed to stick -- in the case of AFL club Essendon, slowly sliding off the Bombers' fuselage and leaving an icky stain in its wake. As Crikey noted at the time, the initial six-headed Parliament House press conference featuring hardman rhetoric from new federal Justice Minister Jason Clare prompted an outpouring of "darkest day" headlines stretching around the country. In a swingeing post on fan forum BomberBlitz this week, blogger Jason Hannigan exposed some of the hyperbole surrounding the media's reporting of the Dons' situation, especially the inference coach and club legend James Hird had denied knowledge of an injection program overseen by sports scientist Steve Dank. In fact, Hird has never denied knowledge of a program and has only said he believed his players were "clean" -- that is, the supplement program fell within the allowable limits mandated by the AFL and World Anti-Doping Agency. Hannigan also notes the storm of shock horror reporting from the likes of Caroline Wilson over drug "waivers" signed by players, even though it subsequently emerged, via 232-game stalwart and silky smooth disposal king Mark McVeigh, that players had actually requested the waivers themselves. Further, Hannigan cites the testimony of Dr Robin Willcourt from South Yarra's Epigenx centre, who told Crikey on February 6 he had been visited by Dank and Dean "The Weapon" Robinson early last year and was presented with players' blood work. The samples suggested stars had been overworked in the 2012 pre-season and had flagging levels of testosterone and growth hormone levels. A number of devastating injuries over 2012 -- including David Zaharakis' ridiculous three-month absence with a quad injury -- seemed to suggest players had lower (not higher) levels of naturally occurring substances in their veins. The ACC's CEO John Lawler has copped plenty of criticism over the timing of his report given that substantial investigations still need to be carried out by state and federal police forces to actually secure convictions. It appears Victoria Police received the report five months ago but failed to act citing a lack of evidence. But the damage for Essendon's season has already been done. In an episode of Sunday Extra this week, Peter Faris accused the "permanent Royal Commission" of severe over-reach with secrecy provisions giving it a licence to run roughshod over principles of natural justice. This morning in The Australian, Melbourne reporter Chip Le Grand -- ironically one of the targets of Hannigan's ire on BomberBlitz -- noted correctly that the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority's probe into the sport had been conducted by former OPI operations director John Nolan. The ACC's probe and subsequent report was overseen by former OPI deputy director Paul Jevtovic. During its 12-year reign before being shuttered by the Baillieu government, the OPI was criticised for its bullish approach to investigations backed by extraordinary powers to compel witnesses to answer questions. However, like the ACC, there was arguably a serious lack of oversight and internal accountability. *Disclosure: Andrew Crook is an Essendon supporter

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

7 thoughts on “Football faithful hit back at evidence-free drugs probe

  1. paddy

    [Disclosure: Andrew Crook is an Essendon supporter]

    You are henceforth dead to me and all right thinking Crikey subscribers.

  2. mikeb

    I am certainly no Essendon fan but this media circus and the gravely nodding commentariat who are blindly throwing mud are a disgrace. If there are accusations to be made then make them & show us the evidence. Everyone is being tainted – most of them I think unjustly.
    However if you could have dragged Collingwood into it then I’d be less concerned.

  3. Kristian

    “Disclosure: Andrew Crook is an Essendon supporter”.

    No, really? Couldn’t tell…

    I’m going with Gerard Whateley on this one. Check out Offsiders from last Sunday and you’ll see what I mean.

  4. Jim Moore

    This was written by an Essendon supporter?! I never would have guessed. Please Crikey, could we have at least someone with objectivity writing articles about this issue. If I want partisan football supporter gibberish there’s plenty of AFL fan forums I could visit, but I choose not to.

  5. Mark from Melbourne

    Didn’t Essendon out itself? This article reminds me of my Grandad’s favoriate saying “if you saw it in the street you’d step over it”…

    I think there is more than enough stinky stuff to warrant the press conference, assuming all these apologists like Crook dont win the day. Interesting name that…

  6. klewso

    Isn’t there a lot of money riding on this?

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details