Crikey says: our drug-free world champions
Labor's blue collar pitch: Bernard Keane on the economic narrative. We love a punt, supposedly, but most of us would ban sports betting. Nick Xenophon booted from Malaysia: the political context. Mark Latham takes on Piers Akerman. And The Conversation goes global.
Please put this win in perspective — it’s banal to paint it as a fabulous achievement.
How many women play cricket worldwide? And given women aren’t particularly encouraged to play a lot of sport in many cricket mad countries like India and Pakistan, the competition would be nowhere near as tough as the men’s comp.
And i’m guessing women’s sport in India possibly attracts far less financial support than women’s sport in Australia (which i understand is far less than the funding that goes to the men’s team!), so whoopie do, … women from comfy middle class Australia flog the few women from third world countries who play a dull game like cricket.
If women’s cricket did attract a big audience and consequently a lot of funding, you can bet it would be rife with the same drugs and corruption that every other lucrative sport attracts.
Winning a dull, irrelevant competition that doesn’t register on the big money scene, does not make a team a beacon of goodness in a sea of sport corruption.
Thanks Crikey. This deserves more attention than it is getting. Injecting mega-bucks into (mens) sport has meant poor outcomes for our sporting values (drugs, bad behaviour and egos). As you say, these women do an amazing job for next to no money. All power to them.
What “sport” used to mean?
… before it grew horns, a tail, a milking stool, wealthy “milk-hands” and all those other dependents?
Meg: paying attention to women’s sport is probably the best way of reducing the gender disparity. And reducing inequality – as well as encouraging wider participation in sports – seem merit-worthy goals to me.