Jan 25, 2013

It’s just not cricket that Sri Lanka keeps playing

The call for a boycott of Sri Lanka's cricket team following the actions of the Sri Lankan military against the country's Tamil population is growing. But it's not just a cricket issue ...

Professor Damien Kingsbury

Crikey international affairs commentator

The government of Sri Lanka has been embarrassed over its human rights record by a call for a boycott campaign being run by respected Australian sports writer Trevor Grant. Grant has been using the Sri Lanka cricket team’s current tour of Australia to highlight what the UN believes were war crimes committed in Sri Lanka in 2009 and a subsequent campaign of human rights abuse against the country’s Tamil minority.

The campaign is the first politically driven proposed boycott of sports in Australia since the anti-apartheid boycotts of South African sporting teams in the 1970s and ’80s.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

5 thoughts on “It’s just not cricket that Sri Lanka keeps playing

  1. Gavin Moodie

    Yes, it may be time to call for restrictions on Sri Lanka’s participation in international events. The next cricket world cup will be hosted by Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand in 2015.

  2. prembrowne

    If every country that has had a government responsible for human rights violations was boycotted in the sporting sphere, there may be few international sporting contests remaining. It seems that in this case, the Sri Lankan government of the day, AND the Tamil Tigers themselves, were both deemed responsible for the tragedy in 2009. But not the people of Sri Lanka themselves, who have as much right as we do in Australia to watch their teams represent them in International sporting events. Perhaps the Sri Lankan President should deliver a Rudd-style apology to the victims’ families, and everything will be forgiven.
    If war crimes were committed during the civil war we would hope that those responsible will be held to account. We would hope that in this post-war period the country as a whole will consolidate its democratic ideals. But perhaps it’s a little early to be calling for a sporting boycott.

  3. pritu

    Thank you for brnging attention to this issue, which the rest of the media seems bent on pretending doesn’t exist. The present government of Sri Lanka’s record on the democratic process is, if comparisons are needed, far worse than the Burmese government before its current (apparent) softening. And that’s not even before their war crimes are considered. And I’ll bet that no one can name the current head of their government, so well are their crimes ignored.

  4. Andrew Freeman

    I’m surprised at the a-historical and one sided analysis of the conflict in Sri Lanka suddenly favoured in Australian media, presumably because one prominent journalist has taken a side, in the latter years of this difficult conflict.

    there is no excuse for government sponsored violence. But there’s no excuse for ideological bias or historical omission either.

    England’s imperial habit of favouring workers from another country – in this case India – and their discriminatory treatment of races within a country – divide to rule – helped sow the seeds of racial conflict in Sri Lanka between Tamils and Sinhalese people – as this European imperial habit did and still does in many countries around the world.

    It is blithe and somewhat patronising for members of the british commonwealth – in this case, Australian media – not to acknowledge this.

    BLind support of tamil claims against Sinhalese claims would be like English speaking media suddenly deciding to boycott Catholic Ireland in support of the protestant north.

    This is not to support recent violences by the Sri Lankan government. But the conflict began decades ago. . It’s worth noting that Tamil resistance movement and eventually its guerilla tactics were in part fostered by writers among a diaspora of Tamil intellectuals who moved to the UK in the 1960s.

    Is history repeating in Australia?

  5. Mark out West

    Obviously most of the people that have written a response are thoughtful people who took the time to read a story about human rights, but not the UN report about potential genocide.

    Please watch the 4 corners report which has vision of the Sri Lankan army shelling the makeshift hospitals once their co-ordinates had been supplied. The list is extensive and although there are significant issues with the Tamils the type of retaliation is never justified.

    The Australian government response is typical of the Julia/Swan right wing government. This cosy relationship is necessary to STOP THE BOATS.

    It is typical of what it means to STOP THE BOATS that people are left in appalling situations where they are under daily threat, but at least we are not responsible for that are we?

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details