Jan 21, 2013

Trouble in paradise — blame shifting on unemployment in Queensland

Unemployment in Queensland has -- unsurprisingly -- increased following the Newman's governments significant cuts across the public service. Blaming others doesn't cut it, says Professor John Quiggin.

Queensland Treasurer Tim Nicholls has attempted to explain away the latest unemployment figures, which show Queensland pulling up the rate for the country as a whole, as a case of “a weaker global outlook, including uncertainty about the US ‘fiscal cliff’ and a decline in commodity prices” — not the result of state job cuts.

The question that springs immediately to mind is: Why bother? Wouldn’t he be better off with some Thatcherite “no pain, no gain” rhetoric, promising that the cuts his government has implemented will yield pay-offs for all Queenslanders in the long run?

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

21 thoughts on “Trouble in paradise — blame shifting on unemployment in Queensland

  1. Bill Hilliger

    Just wait till’ an Abbott/Pell coalition government gets in following the 2013 election. There will be massive redundancies and sackings of public sector employees accross the board. Justification by a lazy Pete our former fairweather treasurer who will study the Australian fiscal position and give Abbott/Pell a trigger to do their worst, unemployment figures will leapfrog to heights not seen since the Howard era, and yes interest rates will rise. Let’s hear the squeals then.

  2. klewso

    Were “Santo Claws'” lips moving when his “Timmy” said that?

  3. klewso

    This is “government by hyper-bowl”.

  4. geomac62

    Something is seriously wrong with QLD politics when just over 49% of the vote delivers a landslide in seats .

  5. Arty

    Jerry Mander main sure that the Bananabenders got the government they wanted, and that they can keep it for many many years.

  6. Karen

    Clearly, the only inference to draw is Queenslanders enjoy voting themselves out of work and services and handing their hard earned dollars to rich businesses who pocket and don’t hire. Mugs.

  7. Flowenswell

    Quiggin shows the obvious deleterious effects of a government ideologically opposed to government spending, and stimulus, unless it subsidises profit-making business. It’s a model that fails to recognise the need for a balance of prosperity in a society in order to attract sustainable investment, rather than attempt to race to the bottom. No doubt we’ll see similar results in the NT over the coming year.

  8. Hugh (Charlie) McColl

    So Karen, you write from the high ground observatory in which particular state?

  9. zut alors

    Queenslanders voted for Newman & Co because they wanted to make a point to Anna Bligh – she was obstinate, refusing to listen to the electorate’s concerns during her final term in office. Frustrated, the electorate was dead-set determined she would hear them (albeit too late).

    Unfortunately, 49% of voters having made their point and having rammed it home, we are now lumbered with this disproportionately representative gaggle who simply couldn’t believe their luck last March. We didn’t actually want them.

    Tread carefully in 2013, Australia.

  10. MJPC

    For Queensland (and NSW somewhat) it is much the case of “You reap what you sow”; of course Newman and his crown of tea party lights will implement failed policies, it is the only thought thay have…shaft the worker, look after the big end of town as aptly summarised below:

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details