Politics

Jan 18, 2013

Richard Farmer’s chunky bits: please, no debates about the debates

Let's hope Julia Gillard was correct this morning when she said an agreement can be reached "relatively soon" on the idea of a leaders' debates commission. For if there is one thing more boring than the debates themselves it is a debate about the debates.

Richard Farmer

Crikey political commentator

The debate over debates that probably don't matter. I found the assessment by American academics and pollsters on the importance of televised debates between the candidates an interesting sidelight to last year's presidential election. On balance I was left with the impression that the three appearances had little impact on voting intentions despite the mighty efforts of the media pundits to give them great significance. Hence my lack of interest in the continuing tooing and froing between Labor and the Coalition on the format debates will have in Australia later this year. My only hope is that Prime Minister Julia Gillard was correct this morning in expressing the hope that an agreement can be reached "relatively soon" on the idea of a leaders' debates commission. For if there is one thing more boring than the debates themselves it is a debate about the debates. The benefits of Latin. The Papacy is bringing back Latin. And all because of the need for brevity when communicating via Twitter.

Explains Roberto Spataro, secretary of the Pontifical Academy for Latin Studies, which Benedict XVI founded last year:
"Twitter is a tool which requires rapid communication," he said.  In English you say 'the corruption of the best one is horrible'; in Latin, three words suffice: 'corrupt optima pessima'. It is a language which helps to think with precision and sobriety. And it has produced an exceptional heritage of science, knowledge and faith."
Putting them in the slammer. From Michael Froomkin via Mark Thoma comes this insight into the American way.

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions

3 comments

Leave a comment

3 thoughts on “Richard Farmer’s chunky bits: please, no debates about the debates

  1. klewso

    Leader debates? “The Americanization of Enmity”?

  2. John Bennetts

    Nobody said that one hot spell is clear evidence of climate change, but you can’t help yourself, can you?

    You said: “But appropriate too for a reminder that one hot spell in one part of the world does not climate change make.”

    If this is the best you can offer as some kind of last-gasp stand against the unpleasant reality that is climate change, then why bother? It is, at base, an insult to the intelligence of your readers and it says something about your own intelligence regarding this subject.

    Richard, truisms and straw man stuff such as this are not argument. They aren’t even civilised, given the severity of the problem referred to.

    And, yes, I am cranky. And disappointed. This was disgusting and inappropriate. If you have something serious to say on the subject of climate change, then perhaps that is exactly what you should do.

  3. Joel

    Also remember that higher temperatures mean that the atmosphere can hold more water vapour. There’s also only a particular band in which snowstorms can occur – not only can it be too warm for snow but it can also be too cold. Which means that in particularly cold places warmer temperatures can mean more snow, by getting the temperature above that lower limit (while also lowering the likelihood of snow in warmer areas).

    http://www.skepticalscience.com/Record-snowfall-disproves-global-warming.htm

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...