had it all worked out. The new Chinese leader
had wielded understatement like a scalpel -- rhetoric was slashed
, and promises were made to enforce the constitution
-- in a low-key beginning to his time in power that seemed designed to avoid high-profile incidences of dissatisfaction and protest. But one rumbled online over the weekend and into the streets on Monday.
Yesterday, hundreds of people assembled outside the offices of the Southern Weekend
, regarded as one of China’s most outspoken newspapers, to rail against a serious violation of the newspaper’s editorial ethics and show solidarity with striking journalists. The strike and the protests that followed represent one of the most visible battles for freedom of speech in decades, one that has sparked outrage among local media, students and intellectuals -- and amazement from many onlookers.
Police in Guangzhou, where the Southern Weekend head office is based, observed the protests but largely did not interfere. Protesters held small signs and yellow chrysanthemums, a flower commonly associated with Chinese funerals, this time mourning the death of press freedom.
Thunderclouds began to brew last week at the Southern Weekend when the paper’s journalists arrived at work expecting to see their usual New Year editorial. In typical style, the address originally contained a call to realise constitutionalism in China, allowing citizens to openly criticise those in power -- seemingly in keeping with Xi’s promises. Instead they found these calls for democracy removed, and in their place was an error-strewn pro-Communist Party puff piece allegedly penned by the paper’s propaganda chief, Tuo Zhen.
say Tuo, previously a vice-president at China’s state news agency Xinhua, had objections to the original editorial. Dissatisfied with editors’ amendments, he then proceeded to neuter it without the knowledge of the page editor. The China Media Project
has images of the various pieces
as well as a translation.
"This was an unprecedented level of interference even for China, where most media outlets must have a propaganda department to make sure what appears on the page is in keeping with orders from the government."
Some sources now say Tuo
was not at work when the incident occurred, but one thing is certain -- this was an unprecedented level of interference even for China, where most media outlets must have a propaganda department with the authority to make sure what appears on the page is pleasing to and in keeping with orders from the government.
Unamused, Southern Weekend
’s journalists penned an open letter to the public accusing the propaganda office of "raping" the paper’s editorial autonomy
and pointing out the various errors the replacement piece contained.
On the weekend, various social media networks were abuzz as censors moved to ban the relevant discussion topics. On Weibo, the search terms "Southern" and "Weekly" were banned; it was pointed out
that this was the equivalent of banning the words "New", "York" and "Times" on Twitter.
's main Weibo account released a notice saying the revised piece was planned and "related online rumours are untrue"; but, minutes earlier, the employee responsible for the account had posted that he had turned over the password to censors
Journalists who had used microblogs to discuss the incident had their access restricted, and the paper's various sections used their separate Weibo
accounts to confirm these accounts, only to be shut down one by one. These actions spurred almost 100 editorial staff to go on strike yesterday.