Jan 4, 2013

There’s plenty behind LNP’s voluntary voting thought bubble

The Queensland LNP's proposal on voluntary voting is aimed at creating a diversion, seeking partisan advantage and creating a smokescreen to hide possible changes on political donations.

Dr Mark Bahnisch

Brisbane-based political analyst and Centre for Policy Development fellow

The Sunshine State's political season has begun early, waking Queenslanders from their summer torpor with two bombshells: the extension of public sector cuts to senior commissioned police officers and a discussion paper released by Attorney-General Jarrod Bleijie on electoral reform. Bleijie claims to be surprised that canvassing the abolition of compulsory voting has become a flashpoint for debate. But Bleijie has somewhat of a history of being provocative, for example pushing an agenda favoured by conservative religious groups within the LNP for the reversal of same-s-x surrogacy rights. The cynical might be forgiven for thinking Bleijie's latest proposal is a smokescreen for proposed changes more likely to be legislated and with potentially deeper implications; changes to political donations, which include measures potentially restricting union funding to the Labor Party. If it is a diversion, then it has worked. Julia Gillard tweeted to her followers she would vociferously oppose voluntary voting, and Barnaby Joyce argued compulsory voting protects the state against extreme forces. It's significant the Prime Minister also alluded to the potential distortion of politics by "cashed-up interest groups". It’s also significant as another weapon in the ALP's armoury in its quest to leverage Campbell Newman's record for Labor in the federal election. The electoral system has long been controversial in Queensland, from Joh Bjelke-Petersen's gerrymander to Peter Beattie's masterful exploitation of a "just vote one" strategy to use optional preferential voting to further divide disunited conservative forces. Perceptions often outweigh reality in these debates. A mooted change to compulsory preferential voting from former Labor attorney-general Cameron Dick probably would have made little difference to the 2012 state election result, according to ABC electoral analyst Antony Green. Joyce is probably right that the Greens would benefit from a system that favours the ability of activists to organise to get out highly motivated voters. However, whether or not there's partisan calculation behind the support within the LNP, it may not benefit the governing party. Crikey blogger Possum Comitatus has argued on Twitter that most such speculation is meaningless.
"The bigger issue here goes to the lack of any really independent arbiter for the rules of the electoral game ... in a state that proverbially lacks checks and balances to disproportionate power."
What's really interesting in all this controversy is another perception -- that, under the guise of a desire for transparency and accountability, the LNP might be acting to protect its own shaky political interests. As I wrote recently in Crikeythe LNP’s fall from grace has been quick, though the party if not the Premier can still be confident that the polls show it a likely winner of an election. LNP figures have been suggesting that Newman’s plunge is a case of first-term blues, and the ship of state will right itself as the financial situation stabilises and the government's "Four Pillars" policy begins to bear fruit. But as Possum also argues, Essential Research polling discloses the government’s performance on a range of issues is rated very poorly by voters. The Newman government got off to a bad start on accountability, effectively locking the ALP out of parliamentary offices, and a series of unfortunate incidents -- including the December defection of Dr Alex Douglas over his removal as chair of the Parliamentary Ethics Committee investigating former Liberal MP and departmental head Michael Caltabiano -- will no doubt have muddied the waters of the public mind. Then there's the downfall of Housing and Public Works Minister Bruce Flegg, and complaints from parliamentary committees dominated by the government about legislation being rushed through with inadequate consultation. The Labor Party opposition under Annastacia Palaszczuk has made accountability a theme. It's this context that informs the LNP's voluntary voting proposal: does it add to an existing preconception that the party is prepared to play fast and loose with the rules for its own partisan advantage? The bigger issue here goes to the lack of any really independent arbiter for the rules of the electoral game -- a key omission of the Fitzgerald reforms in a state that proverbially lacks checks and balances to disproportionate power. Whether or not the LNP is bringing further political pain on itself is the real question, not whether a putative move to voluntary voting would advantage one side or the other. We don't know the answer yet, but we do know we're already in another fascinating Queensland political year. *Dr Mark Bahnisch is a Fellow of the Centre for Policy Development and a Brisbane-based social and political analyst

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

17 thoughts on “There’s plenty behind LNP’s voluntary voting thought bubble

  1. Steve777

    Voluntary voting would see the rise of voter suppression tactics as we saw in the recent US elections. And it would allow well funded lobby groups and interests a disproportionate influence on the result. Australia is good at elections. I think the view that has prevailed in Australia for 80 years or that voting is both the right and the duty of the citizen is correct. And it’s only attendance at a voting place that’s mandatory, with reasonable exceptions for inconvenience (e.g. Illness, distance). Anyone who really doesn’t want to vote can submit a blank ballot.

  2. jennyt

    If it ain’t broke don’t fix it is the bottom line here. If you don’t want to vote nothing prevents you from leaving the ballot paper empty. You just have to show up, a proper acknowledgement of the sacrifices and struggles people have had all over the world to obtain the right to vote. It is precious and done better here than almost anywhere. I suspect chicanery.

  3. TheFamousEccles

    This is one occasion that I must agree with Barnaby Joyce (though he is not referred to in this article), who has spoken out against this removal of compulsory voting. Having said that publicly, I now need a Bex and a good lay down…

    Newman and his ilk are effectively anti-democracy and running amok, whilst there is no effective check or balance in the QLD parliament. I hope they are shown the door at the next state election.

  4. Nonda Pass

    I often think about the people of East Timor all those years ago – they lined up for days to cast their vote. We should continue to have compulsory voting. As mentioned in other comments, people can lodge a blank ballot if they choose but to have voluntary voting would result in the promotion of self interested, rich groups targeting certain areas with the apathetic in the background. Perhaps that is what Newman wants – his government is looking more like a return to the Petersen years than ever and those of us with long memories remember that era well.

  5. Arty

    Dictators don’t like votes.

  6. GF50

    Agree compulsory voting a duty and a right. Reinstate the upper house. total disclosure and limit of political funding.
    QLD state of the totaltarian right.
    Democracy requires checks and balances, no matter what political persuasion is in government.

  7. pritu

    Regular readers of the Murdoch press are already frothing at the mouth against compulsory voting. Say no more.

  8. Limited News

    Voluntary voting opens the door to large-scale vote fraud. People who can be relied upon to not vote and be identified as such by phone polling or some other means, can have their votes cast for them very easily.

  9. susan winstanley

    There is a classic bait and switch going on here, IMO. Voluntary voting has got everyone talking, and will be ditched. The real democracy killers are the other recommendations for voter ID etc. Keep eye on ball.

  10. Hamis Hill

    Via the state governor this LNP administration can be made accountable to the people of Queensland.
    The Governor can send Campbell Newman to the judgment of the people in an election.
    Election Now! Election Now! Election Now!
    All that we have heard from Abbott for several years.
    As an aside, it is almost one year since Newman was reported to have promised no less than a $100,000,000 increase in funding for “Private?” education.
    Election Now! Election Now! Election Now!
    End the Newman Dictatorship!
    The Governor Must Act!
    Or statements to that effect promulgated endlessly for the duration of the Newman Madness!
    who said there is no accountability?
    Democracy not Dictatorship.
    All available in the Abbott political playbook!

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details