Politics

Nov 21, 2012

Richard Farmer’s chunky bits: Labor’s actions in Nauru a disgrace

Out of sight but not out of mind. Don't worry about the impact of those Julia Gillard dealings with AWU officials back in the 1990s. They are not the reason she will en

Richard Farmer

Crikey political commentator

Out of sight but not out of mind. Don’t worry about the impact of those Julia Gillard dealings with AWU officials back in the 1990s. They are not the reason she will end up in the Labor history books as the party’s most disgraceful leader ever. She is earning that distinction with the appalling cruelty in the way her government is dealing with boat people on Nauru.

Banning the press from reporting directly on what is happening in that tent camp will not halt forever the Australian people discovering the horrors being done in their name.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions

4 comments

Leave a comment

4 thoughts on “Richard Farmer’s chunky bits: Labor’s actions in Nauru a disgrace

  1. kebab shop pizza

    “Alcohol provides protective effect, reduces mortality”

    Press release indeed. Nothing “reduces mortality”. Not even the “water of life”.

  2. michael crook

    Why would be surprised at our treatment of refugees on Nauru. Brutality is a central part of our culture. Look at our national domestic violence statistics and child abuse notifications (340,000 in 2009). Brutality and the abuse of power are what we do. It is an essential part of our culture, and goes hand in hand with our form of capitalism.

  3. CML

    After your rant about the government’s poor treatment of refugees, I suggest you watch Lateline tonight (ABC Tuesday) and then make the same comment!
    The story was about a mother with two disabled children in the Darwin detention centre, who was demanding she be given an “aide” to help care for them???? (No doubt there are a few thousand Australian mothers who would like the same thing). But the amazing statement she made was that she got more help, and the children better treatment, in Iraq!!! Which begs the question, what kind of mother drags two disabled children half way around the world, to say nothing of subjecting them to a very dangerous sea crossing, when their treatment/care in their country of origin was more than adequate? And perhaps you could explain to me how this family was being “tortured/persecuted” in Iraq, while receiving “better care/treatment” for their disabled children than they are receiving in this country? None of this story makes any sense at all – except if it is coming from economic migrants. It just made me angry.
    It is very easy to denigrate the government, but what are they supposed to do with 2,000+ asylum seekers arriving every month. And if we accept all-comers then it will very rapidly become 5,000. Who the hell is going to pay for all this? I just think people like you live in cloud cuckoo land!

  4. Christopher Nagle

    Respectfully Richard, I think your comments on the current asylum imbroglio are unhelpful. See my article ‘Commercial
    Asylum Seekers’ as to why that might be the case at:http://www.writing.com/main/view_item/item_id/1904635-Commercial-Asylum-Seekers

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...